3). How does a caregiver justify making decisions such as those mentioned above, decisions that are based on the caregiver's values and beliefs? Harris is very clear in this regard that these issues are both moral and philosophical, and the real problem is in how the issues are resolved and based on what standards and morals. The author asks three poignant and pertinent questions, which indeed will have application elsewhere: a) is it ever acceptable for a doctor to help a very elderly person commit suicide simply because that elderly person is "finished with life"? b) On which grounds may a physician help the suicide of an individual "whose suffering is neither somatic nor psychiatric?" And c) is there a consensus among doctors in the Netherlands on these questions? (Huxtable, p. 118).
It's not merely about understanding the "natural of moral problems," John Harris explains (p. 4), and it's not just about what is right and what is wrong with reference to medical and human issues. But rather the answers following a decision that is framed in a morally right or wrong context have to be followed up with a good autonomous reason as to "why this is so," Harris continues (p. 4). It is Harris's assertion that a person can only claim that the action they took or the decision they made was based on a moral considerations "…if they can say why those actions and decisions are right, if they can show how they are justified" (author's italics) (p. 4).
In the Netherlands the concept of euthanasia the individual that is suffering must be legally suffering in an "unbearable" way in order to justify euthanasia, Richard Huxtable writes. And in Holland the "other person" must be a licensed physician, not just someone the patient has identified as preferable. On the subject of Holland and euthanasia, Huxtable references the case called "Brongersma," which is the name of an 86-year-old man who was "tired of life" and had his suicide assisted in 1998 by a general practitioner, Huxtable explains on pae 117.
Is being "tired of life" enough to justify committing suicide legally with the help of a doctor? If that is the autonomous decision, why shouldn't be meet the "principled boundary" that the prosecutor in Holland asked the ...
There may or may not be consensus but Huxtable reports that the experts' opinions in Holland basically boiled down to the fact that when older people are "tired of life" that is a "general social, rather than more narrowly medical, problem," and hence there was no "unbearable suffering" in this instance. In his conclusion, Huxtable says that once "voluntary euthanasia as performed by a doctor is allowed" it will be (and has been) difficult to "draw a principled line restricting this to (seemingly) straightforward cases of 'medical' suffering" (p. 126). The debate "is far from over," the author concludes.
The issue of physician-assisted suicide -- and all the arguments and side bar stories and opinions -- will not be settled anytime soon. When there are psychologists, doctors, lawyers, judges, ordinary lay people, clergy and politicians involved in the milieu, no certain policy is expected to emerge. But one thing is certain and that is the current trend points to autonomy as a necessarily part of the final decision.
Beckwith, Francis J. "Absolute Autonomy and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Putting a Bad Idea
Out of Its Misery," in Suicide: A Christian Response: Crucial Considerations for Choosing
Life, Eds. T. Demy ad G. Stewart.
Bickenback, Jerome E. "Disability and Life-Ending Decisions," in Physician-Assisted Suicide:
Expanding the Debate, Eds. M. Battin, R. Rhodes, and A. Silvers. London: Psychology
Harris, John. The Value of Life. London: Psychology Press, 1990.
Huxtable, Richard. Euthanasia, Ethics and the Law: From Conflict to Compromise. New York:
Huxtable, Richard, and Moller, Maaike. "Setting a Principled Boundary'? Euthanasia as a Response to…
The author asks three poignant and pertinent questions, which indeed will have application elsewhere: a) is it ever acceptable for a doctor to help a very elderly person commit suicide simply because that elderly person is "finished with life"? b) On which grounds may a physician help the suicide of an individual "whose suffering is neither somatic nor psychiatric?" And c) is there a consensus among doctors in the Netherlands on these questions? (Huxtable, p. 118).
If a person is incapacitated, the family should be allowed to make whatever decision they feel will cause the least harm. All such decisions should be underlined with full consultation with legal and medical professionals. I believe the best solution is therefore to firstly adhere to the four principles mentioned above. These principles should be underlined by legislation, and include ethically challenging issues such as euthanasia. To prevent indiscretionary approaches
Medical Futility in Nursing Care CARING AND CHOOSING Bioethics is described as both a field of intellectual inquiry and a professional practice that examines moral questions affecting various disciplines (Arras, 2007). These disciplines include biology, medicine, law, public health, policy and ethics. In these disciplines are scholars, teachers, and clinical practitioners, including nurses. Their work has recently been subjected to an unprecedented turn in perspectives concerning relevant issues and behaviors. Among these
Medical Ethics Terrance Ackerman, in his article Why Doctors Should Intervene, presents some of the complicated affective influences that enter into the doctor -- patient relationship when a patient is facing a life threatening situation. Patient autonomy has been the watchword of the medical community. Serving as the Magna Charta by which doctors have operated in their associations with terminal patients, honoring patient autonomy has been the guidelines by which doctors
Paternalism can take a number of forms. Unfortunately, because of the governments increasing amount of interaction and funding of the medical industry, governmental paternalism can take the form of limiting funding, which affects treatment options. This form of paternalism is destructive to the health care industry, and is rarely helpful. This form of paternalism also assumes that the government or funding agency knows more about the well-being of my patient
This step would also require an assessment of the various "what-if" outcomes that might result from sharing the genetic information with the mother only, both the mother and the father, or neither of them. Step Four Based on the foregoing considerations, the physician would appear to have an ethical responsibility to share his discovery with the mother, but the decision to share this information with the father should be at the
This caring paradigm goes far beyond any one individual nurse and produces acts of caring that transcend any one theory and become associated with a greater good -- holism and non-judgmental care (Watson, 1989, 32). Ethics- the power of Watson is that she does not see humans in a vacuum, but as the compilation of many different experiences that work to enrich and enliven their lives, but that cannot ever