Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Band Compare/Contrast
The Beatles and The Rolling Stones are two of the most popular and prolific bands that emerged during the British Invasion of the 1960s. While they became popular around the same time, each band had a unique style and sound. The Beatles and The Rolling Stones helped revolutionize music by introducing audiences to music they had never heard or experienced before.
The Beatles consisted of John Lennon and George Harrison on guitar, Paul McCartney on bass, and Ringo Starr on drums (Szatmary, 2000, p. 103; The Beatles, n.d.). As The Beatles began to hone their sound, their manager, Brian Epstein, felt that it was also necessary for the band to have a distinct image. Initially, The Beatles adopted a rocker look that was heavily influenced by their American rock-n-roll heroes, which included Chuck Berry, Elvis Presley, Johnnie Ray, Frankie Laine, and Bill Haley (Szatmary, 2000, p. 104). However, Epstein felt that this image was too controversial and wanted to change their appearance to make them "more palatable to the general public" (Szatmary, 2000, p. 105). Epstein transformed...
Almost every record label in England rejected The Beatles, yet they were able to overcome this obstacle to become one of the most internationally known and lauded bands of all time.
On the contrary, The Rolling Stones are the antithesis of The Beatles, even though they come from similar backgrounds. The first Rolling Stones line-up was established in 1962 by Brian Jones and included other musicians such as Tony Chapman, Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, and Dick Taylor (Szatmary, 2000, p. 117; The Rolling Stones, n.d.). The Rolling Stones were also greatly influenced by American music, however, unlike The Beatles who were influenced by rock-n-roll, The Rolling Stones were influenced by American blues music. Jones initially intended to bring these musicians…
Bibliography
The Beatles. (n.d.). Accessed 17 September 2012, from http://www.thebeatles.com/#/history/
The Rolling Stones. (n.d.). Accessed 17 September 2012, from http://www.rollingstones.com/band/
Szatmary, D.P. (2000). Rockin' In Time: A Social History of Rock-and-Roll. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones Although both were seminal musical bands during the 1960's, the Beatles and the Rolling Stones formed, and continue to mark distinct cultural styles and trends in the history of 1960's and 1970's music. The Beatles have the advantage over the Rolling Stones, in some sense, in securing their place in musical history because they no longer are a band and had a far briefer history.
S. A withdrawal from that conflict and the demise of the Johnson administration. Several events in particular galvanized the Hippie generation against governmental authority in the 1960s, including the response of various Southern state governments to the growing Civil Rights movement, especially after the disappearance and murder of Civil Rights activists from the Northeast and the use of state troops to resist Supreme Court decisions on the matter of school desegregation. However,
Beatles Rubber Soul (1965) [UK version] Rubber Soul is a spatial and open production, bedecked but not overfilled with novel ideas and instruments. Its songs resemble little vignettes of Pop Art, with the lyrics matching the arrangements and the melodies' quality. Even the straightforward, amusing rocker, Drive My Car, has been performed with tight grooviness, virtually twinkling in self-amusement. Lennon gets better than ever before with this album, via innovative, thoughtful
Bands The British Invasion: The Beatles v the Rolling Stones Two of the most influential rock bands of all time emerged from England in the 1960s during the British invasion. Although they came to prominence around the same time, The Beatles and The Rolling Stones each developed a style that was unique to their bands. Though the two bands were opposites in many ways, they helped to establish a new sound,
Rihanna is certainly a controversial individual and she appears to be well-acquainted with what sells in the present. While Lady Gaga is certainly interesting, it seems that she is taking things too far and that her artistic style goes beyond music and into other spheres of influence. In contrast, Rihanna actually focuses on music in addition to selling an image involving sex, violence, rebellion, and glamour. She practically appears to