Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Still, Burnside did not make use of his possibilities and therefore assumed the Confederate Army's position. Taking into account the limited visibility, the fog and the conditions in the area, mistakes were inevitable. Therefore, his decision not to take full advantage of his available resources also proved important for the outcome of the battle.
Finally, another major element that contributed to the failure of the Fredericksburg campaign was the confusion of the orders given, especially by Burnside. Most often, they were rather ambiguous and could be easily interpreted. For instance, "Burnside issued his attack orders early on the morning of December 13. They called for an assault against Jackson's corps by Major General William B. Franklin's Left Grand Division to be followed by an advance against Marye's Heights by Major General Edwin V. Sumner's Right Grand Division." (United States, Dept. Of Interior, 2006) Therefore, according to his orders, the attack would be carried out with an insufficient number of soldiers which would be defeated. Therefore, again, it was obvious the lack of experience and coordination between the segments of the Unionist Army. Still, there are those who consider that in fact, the Potomac Army was actually fighting not necessarily to win, but in order not to lose. This would be explainable given the fact that Burnside was somewhat afraid of failing to reach the expectations of President Lincoln. The incompetence of General Ambrose E. Burnside proved to be determinant for the immediate evolution of the battle, although the Confederate Army could not improve on its acquired advantage and give a decisive blow to the war efforts of the Unionist Army.
All in all it can be concluded that the Battle of Fredericksburg was indeed an important event in the development of the Civil...
...
Bibliography
Burnside, Ambrose. Fredericksburg Order of Battle. Army of the Potomac. The Official Records of the War of The Rebellion 1862. 12 November. http://www.civilwarhome.com/aopfredericksburg.htm
Burnside, Ambrose. Report of Maj. Gen. E. Ambrose Burnside, U.S. Army, commanding Army of the Potomac, Battle of Fredericksburg. The Official Records of the War of The Rebellion. 1862. 12 November 2006. http://www.civilwarhome.com/burnside.htm
Gallagher, Gary. The Fredericksburg Campaign. Decisions on the Rappahannock. North Carolina: UNC Press, 1995.
Lee, Robert E. Report of General Robert E. Lee, C.S. Army, Commanding Army of Northern Virginia, Battle of Fredericksburg. The Official Records of the War of The Rebellion 1862. 12 November. http://www.civilwarhome.com/leeantietam.htm
O'Reilly, Francis Augustin.The Fredericksburg Campaign: winter war on the Rappahannock. Baton Rouge: LSU Press, 2003.
Palfrey Winthrop, Francis, and Stephen W. Sears. The Antietam and Fredericksburg. Campaigns Of The Civil War. New York: Da Capo Press, 1996.
Stackpole, Edward J. The Fredericksburg Campaign. Mechanicsburg.
Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books, 1991.
United States. Dept. Of Interior. National Park Service. 2006. Battle of Fredericksburg. Aug. 2006. 12 November 2006. http://www.nps.gov/frsp/fredhist.htm
Bibliography
Burnside, Ambrose. Fredericksburg Order of Battle. Army of the Potomac. The Official Records of the War of The Rebellion 1862. 12 November. http://www.civilwarhome.com/aopfredericksburg.htm
Burnside, Ambrose. Report of Maj. Gen. E. Ambrose Burnside, U.S. Army, commanding Army of the Potomac, Battle of Fredericksburg. The Official Records of the War of The Rebellion. 1862. 12 November 2006. http://www.civilwarhome.com/burnside.htm
Gallagher, Gary. The Fredericksburg Campaign. Decisions on the Rappahannock. North Carolina: UNC Press, 1995.
Lee, Robert E. Report of General Robert E. Lee, C.S. Army, Commanding Army of Northern Virginia, Battle of Fredericksburg. The Official Records of the War of The Rebellion 1862. 12 November. http://www.civilwarhome.com/leeantietam.htm
United States. Dept. Of Interior. National Park Service. 2006. Battle of Fredericksburg. Aug. 2006. 12 November 2006. http://www.nps.gov/frsp/fredhist.htm
Battle Analysis-Battle of Fredricksburg The battle of Fredericksburg was a very important battle of the civil war. The paper will look at some important facts about this battle. Opposing forces The battle was one among many other battles where Federal forces had tried to launch attacks on Confederate capital. There was an army organized by Burnside which was an army of the Potomac that was organized into three grand divisions which included infantry
Battle Analysis: Battle of Fredricksburg The Fredericksburg Battle The fighters who took part in the battle Union Forces A number of 31,659 soldiers constituting the Union Forces fought at the Battle of Fredericksburg. The Union Forces came from the Grand Division and were commanded by MG Edwin V. MG Joseph Hooker commanded Sumner from the Center Grand Division which consisted of 40,396 soldiers. MG William B. Franklin was at the helm of affairs of
Battle of Bristoe Station led many to question the Confederacy's grasp of tactics as it was a strategic blunder. In many respects, it confirmed assumptions made after the battle of Gettysburg that the leadership of the Army of Northern Virginia's officer corps was not infallible. It is the principle battle of the Bristoe campaign, one in which General Lee attempted to separate the Army of the Potomac from its
Winning the Civil War The American Civil War is considered the most costly of all the wars fought by this nation in terms of the human lives that were lost and the casualties which left young men mutilated, amputated, and barely able to carry on. Approximately 750,000 young men died by the war's end either from wounds inflicted in battle or from infection and lack of sanitation in hospitals.[footnoteRef:1] At the
German Influences on Texas Culture If one has lived in Texas for any length of time, they will realize immediately that the Texas culture is influenced by German culture in a number of ways. Modern day Texas culture would not exist as it does today if it were not for German influence. Today Texas culture can be described as a blending of German and Texas traditions. Though German culture is not
(Steamboats, incidentally, did even better.) Due to the heavy emphasis on steam transportation, especially by rail the government was better equipped to man and supply vast areas of the nation in combat. The train also traveled at a far greater speed than other more traditional forms of transport, as much as 5 times faster than the mule-drawn wagons of the day. Therefore fewer vehicles were needed and supplies and people