Bible And Criminal Procedure Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
658
Cite
Related Topics:

Criminal Procedures The Bible and criminal procedures

There are several instances where the Bible speaks about the criminal procedures as well as justice in the society. These verses in the Bible were given as guidelines towards ensuring the protection of the innocent from undue punishment and holding the criminals to account for their crime. The verses given in the prompt affirmed my belief and conviction of how the criminal procedures should operate in a civilized society.

In the first instance, the prompt outlines the significance of having witnesses in the course of handling a case. I am in agreement two scriptures on the importance of corroboration by witness testimonies and the need for a second witness to act as a validation or affirmation of the events that led to the crime as accounted for by the first witness in order to fairly convict an individual. Deuteronomy 17:6 further gives higher stakes on witnesses to be more than two when it comes to possible death sentence so that there is further minimization of mistrials.

I am also in agreement with the aspect of cross examination of witnesses since there is a possibility of false testimony hence the investigations...

...

The inclusion of physical evidence is central to determining which way the case goes. In the contemporary law, if the accused person is able to produce physical evidence to prove their innocence or to give a verifiable allay exempting them from the crime scene, then the law will let them free. This is a trend that is also supported by the Bible verses which point out to the centrality of physical evidence in determining cases.
The current system works in the following manner. On the use of witnesses in court, the current system can convict an individual on the testimony of one individual as long as the evidence, be it circumstantial or direct is strong enough to point out to the crime. One common instance is wen a witness repeatedly identifies the person who robbed him or shot at him from an identification parade. On cross examination, the current systems operate pretty much as the Bible indicates, the witnesses are often cross examined by the attorneys…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Cornell University law School, (2015). Self-Incrimination. Retrieved February 24, 2014 from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/self-incrimination

New internation Version. Exodus 20:16. http://biblehub.com/exodus/20-16.htm


Cite this Document:

"Bible And Criminal Procedure" (2015, February 27) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bible-and-criminal-procedure-2148538

"Bible And Criminal Procedure" 27 February 2015. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bible-and-criminal-procedure-2148538>

"Bible And Criminal Procedure", 27 February 2015, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bible-and-criminal-procedure-2148538

Related Documents

Witnesses, Cross Examination, Physical Evidence 1 The scriptures confirmed my views about how criminal procedure should operate according to each topic. Deuteronomy is clear about needing more than one witness, which aligns with common sense. To prevent a “he said, she said” type of argument in court, it is necessary that there be other supporting witnesses. However, as Loftus (1980) has shown, even eyewitness testimony can be unreliable for a number of

1446) and it also reinforces that the offender's actions are not taken seriously by the government. A retributive system for criminal punishment accomplishes the ideal of equal liberty under law (Markel, 2004). When an individual commits a crime, they not only assert superiority over their victim, but also claim superiority, however implied, over the government body and practice of legal liberty. Acts of wrongdoing are paired with consequences -- it

Introduction Public policy can always be Biblically framed, in order to provide sound guidance and structure to the decision-making process. The Bible offers instructional and legal support that can help steer criminal justice policy in a more favorable direction, to bring about desired results like public safety and the rehabilitation of former offenders. Criminal justice leaders are constrained by public policy, which impacts department policies, procedures, and protocols. The may-can-should approach

Bringing Adam Home by Standiford and Matthews (2011) is a book about the case of Adam Walsh, murdered by Otis Toole, and how the crime went unsolved for a quarter of a century. The book tells how John Walsh, father of Adam, became an activist and took to television to help others solve their own cold cases. Meanwhile it tells how Matthews persevered with the case and ultimately located the

For example, he voted to require that schools utilize resources to support religions activities if they designate resources to non-religious activities (Board of Education. v. Mergens, 1990). Further, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) called for vouchers to be given to families of low socioeconomic standing for both religious and secular educational institutions. This being said, Rehnquist was not able to completely disrupt the social change that Warren had started in

Therefore, even staunch proponents of capital punishment share the concern that it be (1) imposed only where extreme punishment is appropriate to the nature of the crime, and (2) applied in a manner that does not cause unnecessary pain or prolonged suffering. Assuming those elements are satisfied, capital punishment is warranted in certain situations. The prospect of conviction in error is one of the strongest positions against capital punishment, precisely