Big Bang Vs. Six-Day Creation Theory Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1157
Cite
Related Topics:

Big Bang vs. Six-Day Creation Theory Man knows that the universe exists; however, his curiosity has not allowed him to dwell on this knowledge alone. Throughout his brief history on this planet, man has struggled to understand his "place in this universe, and furthermore, the place of the universe itself" (LaRocco & Rothstein, n.d.). For ages, he has attempted to find answers on the age of the universe, as well as on the origins of matter and the greater universe. In his quest, man has moved from the mystical beginnings of earth's origin to the development of scientific theories, some of which have only made the subject more complex and intriguing. Man's continued interest in the subject has led to the emergence of two cadres of creationists - the young earth creationists, who posit that earth was created by a supernatural being, over a span of six days, thousands of years ago; and the old earth creationists, who hold that the universe resulted from a great chaotic explosion that occurred millions of years ago.

Old-Earth View: The Big Bang

More than five billion years ago, a chaotic explosion referred to as the Big Bang hit the 10-20 billion-year embryonic universe, causing matter and space within it to begin expanding (LaRocco & Rothstein, n.d.). The Big Bang was, however, not like any other explosion; it was more of an explosion of space that caused the particles of matter, all of which were originally clamped together into a tiny ball, to rush away from each other (LaRocco & Rothstein, n.d). The planets and galaxies were separated from each other, and thanks to the continuing expansion of the universe, continue to move farther away from each other in the Red Shift phenomenon (LaRocco & Rothstein, n.d). The forces were so strong that some of...

...

To this end, earth, and everything in it, was created in six consecutive 24-hour days, which basically translate to 144 hours (Dean, 2003). When the proper provisions for the OT genealogies are made, the earth can rightly be said to have come into existence between 10,000 and 20,000 years ago (Dean, 2003). Young earth creationists posit that the universe existed right from the beginning, although it was formless and empty (Dean, 2003). Over the first three days of creation, the creator focused on producing form by making separations between land and plants; sky and sea; and night and day (Dean, 2003). He then spent the last three days filling these forms, creating plant-eating animals for the land, fish for the sea, birds for the sky, moon for night, and sun for day (Dean, 2003).
Compare and Contrast

Old-earth and young-earth creationists seem to agree on several points, the most significant of which have been discussed in the next subsection.

Creation ex-nihilo: both sides believe that, a finite time ago, a supernatural being created the universe out of nothing, and produced all animals, as well as humans as genetically distinct forms of life (Landgraf, 2011). Both accounts posit that God created every kind of life as a brand new object, and did not rely on tinkering with older forms to make new forms (theistic evolution).

Opposition to Naturalism: both accounts are opposed to naturalism, and view it as a presupposition to the concept of evolution. Both sides observe that the whole…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Dean, D. (2003). Is the Truth Out There: A Journey through Critical Thinking that Spans Man's History, Origin, and Place in the Universe. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.

Landgraf, K. (2011). No Bones about It: The Truth about Fossils and Other Science Myths. Mustang, Oklahoma: Tate Publishing

LaRocco, C. & Rothstein, B. (n.d.). The Big Bang: It Sure was Big. University of Michigan. Retrieved 23 June 2014 from http://www.umich.edu/~gs265/bigbang.htm

Taylor, B. (2008). The Late Great Ape Debate. Santa Rosa, CA: Standard Publishing.


Cite this Document:

"Big Bang Vs Six-Day Creation Theory" (2014, June 23) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/big-bang-vs-six-day-creation-theory-190069

"Big Bang Vs Six-Day Creation Theory" 23 June 2014. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/big-bang-vs-six-day-creation-theory-190069>

"Big Bang Vs Six-Day Creation Theory", 23 June 2014, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/big-bang-vs-six-day-creation-theory-190069

Related Documents

Creation Myth Analysis Case Study of the History of Biblical Creation Narratives What Is Myth? What Is History? Manetho Josephus Jeroboam Is Genesis 1:1-2:4 Myth? Is Genesis 1:1-2:4 History? Is Genesis 1:1-2:4 Both Myth and History? An Analysis of the Biblical Creation Narrative of Genesis 1:1-25 and Egypt's Possible Influence on the Historical Record God created the world in just six days, and rested on the seventh, but scholars have not rested at all over the millennia in their investigation of

Earth Science Probably one of the biggest and longest fought wars between science and religion has been on the subject of whether the earth was created, as science says, with a massive explosion known as the big bang or within a span of six days as religion teaches us. Science looks into and probes at what is majorly unknown and religion has always done better than that. This paper will discuss

Youth Leadership and Theory
PAGES 15 WORDS 4853

Theory Compare and contrast at least three views on what constitutes a theory. Distinguish the related concepts of theories, such as hypothesis, paradigm, model and concept. Differentiating between hypothesis and theory The word hypothesis is a description of various phenomenon occurring. In most cases, it's not a confirm statement. In other cases, it can be well-developed, designed and explained to follow through the workings and mechanisms of certain phenomenon. According to one definition,

The ceased to exist when the star stops to expand and melts -- when it can will itself to shine again and starts looking for ways to become a shining star again -- when it becomes a star, it becomes a nuclear reactor. A nuclear reactor is defined a device in which a nuclear fission chain reaction occurs under controlled conditions so that the heat yield can be harnessed or

Chemistry and Biology on Christian Mind The Effects Chemistry and Biology on Christian Mind Science and Christianity share a very conflicting relationship. There are different faces of this relationship and we can determine this relationship by using different models. One of such models suggests that science and Christianity are in conflict with each other. Though both of these areas ask you the same question but the answers which they seek are

Scientific Models and Religious Myths Differences between scientific models and religious myths There are several approaches toward s the creation issue, some of them are scientific and others are religious. All the approaches are postulates towards the search for the cradle of man. They may therefore be divided into scientific models and religious myths. Although people view these theories and models from different perspectives, they too have their similarities. Therefore this paper