Blackstone With Washington Criminal Code The American Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
659
Cite

¶ … Blackstone with Washington Criminal Code The American legal system derives almost entirely from the British common law system. That is why, in America, if there is no precedent for a particular set of facts at trial, the court will look to common law from centuries before America even existed as a nation.

The similarities are even more noticeable in criminal law than they are in civil law. The homicide passages in Blackstone's descriptions of the law, for instance, are strikingly similar in many ways to the homicide paragraphs in the Washington Criminal Code.

Blackstone divides homicide into three separate branches: justifiable homicide, excusable homicide and felonious homicide. All three are the "killing of any human creature," but there are significant differences between the three, according to Blackstone. (Blackstone, 71)

Justifiable homicide can be due to necessity (a public official putting a felon to death as prescribed by the law, for instance, is one of Blackstone's examples), or a homicide committed in the advancement of public justice (stopping a more dangerous crime, for...

...

Blackstone, 72).
Justifiable homicide, for Blackstone, means that the person committing the homicide should not at all face liability for his or her actions. Just as the word implies, the act was entirely justified by the surrounding circumstances.

Excusable homicide, on the other hand, is an entirely different ballgame for Blackstone. For instance, if a man kills someone by accident, and his actions were "moderate," he may not be culpable at all, or his crime might be more appropriately labeled "manslaughter." (Blackstone, 73)

However, if he exceeds the "bounds of moderation," he is still culpable. A generally excusable action is only excusable for Blackstone if certain qualifications are met by the actor. (Blackstone, 73)

Also, self-defense homicide is also excusable, and not justifiable, according to Blackstone. (Blackstone, 74) Blackstone differentiates self-defense from homicide in order to prevent a public crime or an assault. (Blackstone, 74)

Then, lastly, Blackstone cites felonious homicide.…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Blackstone, Williams. "Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume IV, 1796."

Washington Criminal Code, Section 9A.32


Cite this Document:

"Blackstone With Washington Criminal Code The American" (2003, March 07) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/blackstone-with-washington-criminal-code-144755

"Blackstone With Washington Criminal Code The American" 07 March 2003. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/blackstone-with-washington-criminal-code-144755>

"Blackstone With Washington Criminal Code The American", 07 March 2003, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/blackstone-with-washington-criminal-code-144755

Related Documents

However, as criminals become more aware of undercover tactics, the covert officer is required to provide more and more proof that he is indeed a criminal- which leads to the officer committing acts that compromise his or her integrity for the sake of maintaining cover. By understanding the often conflicting nature of these goals, deception and integrity, we can see how an undercover officer can become confused, lost, and

Habeaus Corpus
PAGES 8 WORDS 3016

" Despite the stated expansion, habeas protection continued to be applied only to cases in which the defendant alleged that the sentencing court lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction. The Court extended the reach of federal habeas review during the later part of the nineteenth century, however, by changing the circumstances under which the lack of state court jurisdiction could be found. Even after this shift, federal habeas courts sat