Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Certainly, there are other solutions than a huge overhaul of the entire organization's IT in this process. One concept might be to put the ERP system in place in Westin as quickly as possible, work out the bugs, develop a training process, and then one-by-one invite members of the other companies to train at Westin prior to implementation. The advantage to this would be a lower risk (both fiscally and organizationally); the disadvantage would be slowing down the integration process in the other business groups. Research does show, however, that rather than basic, software-specific training, a more broad-based understanding of the integration of systems and the flow of information is needed in order for ERP to be successful. Additionally, planning for future issues is akin to managing risk, and might serve Braebill better to have a chance to beta-test a system prior to full implementation (Buchanan and Connor 2001). This could be accomplished by forming an organizational wide ERP Implementation Team, with members from each company participating in the work already completed by Westin. Since so much of the work is already completed, there is a jump on both time and costs. By using individuals from the other groups, there is a chance of greater training opportunities, buy-in, and appropriate...
The concern of OSS for Braebill is the complexity of the multiple organizations and their needs. ISS systems like ERP Lite and XTuple software have been shown to be successful with smaller organizations, but rarely have the power and flexibility needed by larger companies with multiple types of sub-business categories (Olson and Staley 2012).
REFERENCES
Buchanan, D., and M. Connor. "Managing Process Risk: Planning for the Booby Traps Ahead." Strategy and Leadership 29, no. 3 (2001): 23-9.
Dodgson, M. "Technology Learning, Technology Strategy and Competitive Pressures." British Journal of Management 2, no. 3 (1991): 133-49.
Eierman, M, and J. Iverson. "When IT Slows Down the Pace of Change." Journal of Cases on Information Technology 11, no. 2 (2009): 22-41.
Mabert, V. "Enterprise Resource Planning: Common Myths vs. Evolving Reality." Business Horizon 44, no. 3 (2001): 69-73.
Olson, D., and J. Staley. "Case study of open-source enterprise resource planning implementation…
REFERENCES
Buchanan, D., and M. Connor. "Managing Process Risk: Planning for the Booby Traps Ahead." Strategy and Leadership 29, no. 3 (2001): 23-9.
Dodgson, M. "Technology Learning, Technology Strategy and Competitive Pressures." British Journal of Management 2, no. 3 (1991): 133-49.
Eierman, M, and J. Iverson. "When IT Slows Down the Pace of Change." Journal of Cases on Information Technology 11, no. 2 (2009): 22-41.
Mabert, V. "Enterprise Resource Planning: Common Myths vs. Evolving Reality." Business Horizon 44, no. 3 (2001): 69-73.
It is not impossible for a company to end up with ERP systems that they do not need simply because they thought they wanted something and then changed their mind. Conversely, it is also likely that companies will end up with ERP systems that they do not need because they were talked into them by overzealous vendors. The most important thing that vendors know about the implementation of ERP systems
All items their old system could not handle. Critical Success Factors: According to Bingi, Sharma, and Godla (1999) Implementing an ERP causes massive change that needs to be carefully managed to reap the benefits of an ERP solution. Critical issues that must be carefully considered to ensure successful implementation include commitment from top management, reengineering of the existing processes, integration of the ERP with other business information systems, selection and management of
In addition, the software can be used to track data that is only being used by the person who is creating the data. This would be much the same way as having the software for personal use, only it would be used for organizational purposes. Because the software is useful in many different kinds of situations and for various types of data, that makes the software much more valuable and
The SME can then refine the description of the requirements and the formulation of the company's questions to the vendors. Each requirement is ranked according to the risks and opportunities identified by each user group and an aggregate of the data allows the user groups opinions to be consolidated (Krystkowiak et al., 2004). Finally, Figure 3 below is an OPAL screen that shows how the SME weights each requirement by
Enterprise Resource Planning Enterprise Resource Management Planning for Business Success The Youtube video covers Enterprise resource planning (ERP) which is a process that integrates all external and internal management information across an entire business organization. This process embraces the finance/accounting, sales and service manufacturing, customer relationship management and other aspects of an organization. ERP systems fully automate all of this organizational activity with integrated software whose purpose is to help with the
The real demand i.e. The received orders are taken into account in this system, whereas the Material Requirements Planning system is based upon the concept of expected orders. The Material Requirements Planning system continues however the design might get further modifications, whereas in Enterprise Resource Planning system require a system based on coding parts which is expected to determine the tracking and requirement analysis. The products are booked into and