Burma Cannot Have A Democracy Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
740
Cite

In spite of the fact that everyone would like matters to be simpler in the case of Burma, the masses need to comprehend that the authoritarian government in the country is not going to change as a result of outside pressures or because of Suu Kyi's intervention. The fact that the opposition's leader was released stands as proof that the country's current leaders have developed a great deal of trust in their own powers and that they are no longer considering that Suu Kyi poses a threat to their well-being. Her release does not actually mean that she is free to exercise her rights and get actively involved in creating a better democrat movement that would oppose the government. Similar to how they behaved during the two previous periods when she was released from imprisonment, the authorities are likely to impose their power and prevent her from getting involved in political affairs in the country (Burmese Dissident Is Freed After Long Detention).

Although Suu Kyi's release can be taken for an example of pro-democrat principles in the government, reality can be very different. It might be that the...

...

By maintaining relatively peaceful relationships with other countries, they have ensured that matters in Burma will not change in the coming future.
Hilsum, Lindsey "Why Burma Was Crushed: As Burmese Pro-Democracy Activists Are Rounded Up, the West Looks to China to Intervene. We Are Failing to See the Seismic Changes That Authoritarian Capitalism Is Bringing the World," New Statesman 8 Oct. 2007

Zarni, Maung "Why We Must Talk to the Generals: Focusing on Aung San Suu Kyi May Not Be the Best Way to Bring Democracy to Burma, Argues Maung Zarni. Real Change, He Says, Will Require the Co-operation of Those Now in Power," New Statesman 14 Aug. 2006

"Burmese Dissident Is Freed After Long Detention," Retrieved March 24, 2011, from the nytimes Website: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/world/asia/14myanmar.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1

Sources Used in Documents:

Hilsum, Lindsey "Why Burma Was Crushed: As Burmese Pro-Democracy Activists Are Rounded Up, the West Looks to China to Intervene. We Are Failing to See the Seismic Changes That Authoritarian Capitalism Is Bringing the World," New Statesman 8 Oct. 2007

Zarni, Maung "Why We Must Talk to the Generals: Focusing on Aung San Suu Kyi May Not Be the Best Way to Bring Democracy to Burma, Argues Maung Zarni. Real Change, He Says, Will Require the Co-operation of Those Now in Power," New Statesman 14 Aug. 2006

"Burmese Dissident Is Freed After Long Detention," Retrieved March 24, 2011, from the nytimes Website: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/world/asia/14myanmar.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1


Cite this Document:

"Burma Cannot Have A Democracy" (2011, March 24) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/burma-cannot-have-a-democracy-3436

"Burma Cannot Have A Democracy" 24 March 2011. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/burma-cannot-have-a-democracy-3436>

"Burma Cannot Have A Democracy", 24 March 2011, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/burma-cannot-have-a-democracy-3436

Related Documents

Democracy and Military Intervention Democracy Democracy may be a way of life in the United States but elsewhere in the world it is a foreign concept. As democracy spreads around the globe there are many places where its development has been impeded by the intervention of the military and the establishment of a military dictatorship. But what factors are likely to produce military intervention? Brian Clive Smith, in his book "Understanding Third

Since 1996, military abuses have forced one million villagers to flee their homes. The presence and conduct of the military are central to the plight of these civilians. Military operations have placed a particularly heavy burden on rural populations affecting their ability to sustain livelihoods. Cases of rape and sexual violence committed by military personnel, many of them against young girls and adolescents, have been reported by human rights organizations. It should also

Findings, Conclusion and Recommendations After 62 years under the colonial rule of Great Britain, Burma was briefly treated to a democracy for 14 years in 1948 until a series of military juntas decimated it and hurled the country into a perfect or nearly perfect dictatorial regime. Ethnic groups struggled to restore that democracy in a passive and peaceful mass action, only to end in bloodshed and tactical repression. In 1990,

For example, in 2006 Myanmar was removed from an international list of states that supported money laundering, after it took steps to crack down on banks that were engaged in the practice (Myanmar removed from, 2006). The Financial Action Task Force praised Myanmar for its aggressive efforts to close rogue banks and prosecute their operators (Myanmar removed from, 2006). In addition, Myanmar has taken successful steps to curb opium cultivation within

Aung San Suu Kyi
PAGES 15 WORDS 4111

Aung San Suu Kyi comparison between Aung San Suu Kyi and Rosa Parks Both Aung San Suu Kyi and Rosa Parks have become enduring and vivacious symbols of the civil rights movements in their respective countries. By refusing to give up her seat to a white person and to move to the back of the bus, Parks ignited a firestorm of race-related protests that galvanized civil rights crusades of later leaders like

Karen People: Their Plight and Marginalization The Karen people encompass an ethnic group living in Thailand and Southeast Asia which speaks the Sino-Tibetan language. The Karen are an ethnically diverse group of people: many of them are Skaw Karen and still others are Pwo Karen and Bwe Karen. This group makes up around 7% of the Burmese people and many of them live on the border between Thailand and Karen. Approximately