Business And Corporate Research Paper

PAGES
4
WORDS
1234
Cite

Business Strategy Business and Corporate

business strategy analysis of kraft foods

Analysis of Business Level Strategy

Kraft Foods Inc. is the second largest food company in the world and makes annual revenues in excess of $54 billion (Kraft Foods Annual Report, 2012). It operates in a highly competitive consumer foods industry where high volume sales are essential for competitive success. Tapping into new markets and growing one's brand portfolio are also important for growth and success.

Kraft Foods Inc. pursues a number of business-level strategies to support its corporate level strategies. The business level strategies are determined by answering the question How do we compete? (Ireland, Hoskisson & Hitt, 2008). Kraft Foods Inc. has selected product differentiation and brand development as its primary business level strategy. Product differentiation involves creating and conveying to the consumer a unique feature of the product portfolio that distinguishes the company from the competition and offers something that the consumers value. Kraft Foods Inc. develops brands in a number of product categories including biscuits, confectionery, beverages and convenience meals. Some of the well-known brands of the company are Tang, Cadbury, Kraft, Oreo and Lu. The company has adopted nutritional value as the differentiating feature to market its products in 170 countries around the world (Kraft Foods Annual Report, 2012). In addition to differentiation, the company also pursues low costs through sustainable sourcing, efficient packaging and reduced transportation costs (Kraft Foods Annual Report, 2012). These strategies project the image of a responsible company and keep costs low.

In my opinion, the differentiation strategy is the most effective business level strategy for the company because a diverse brand portfolio enables the company to address the diverse needs and tastes of the consumer segments. Consumers prefer localized products; therefore Kraft Foods Inc. needs to expand its brand portfolio...

...

This would enable the firms to seek growth in new markets.
Analysis of Corporate Level Strategy

The corporate level strategy of any company reflects how the company perceives its competitive and general environment and how it chooses to respond to it. Corporate level strategies are determined in consideration of the product, geographic reach and level of vertical integration (Furrer, 2011).

Because the market is rapidly expanding along with the competitive activity, Kraft Foods has adopted strategies to pursue growth. To pursue its growth objective, the company has been pursuing a policy of strategic mergers, divestments and acquisitions. However, since 2000, the acquisitions strategy has been the primary corporate level growth strategy of the company. Since 2000, the company has acquired a number of important brands such as the Back to Nature cereal brand in 2003, the Lu biscuit brand in 2007 and Cadbury in 2010. During the same period, the company has divested brands like Post in 2008 and its pizza business in 2010. In 2011, Kraft Foods Inc. announced its most ambitious strategic move by revealing plans to enter the grocery business and the global snacks market by launching two independent spinoff companies by the end of 2012 (Kraft Foods Fact Sheet, 2011).

Kraft Foods has been seen to prune its brand and business portfolio by strategic acquisitions and divestments of brands. Of these strategies, the most effective is the acquisition strategy because it allows the company to respond with flexibility to the changing environment. By the strength of its capital, the company gets access to established brands that can be used to enter new markets. The strategic move to enter the grocery business is an attempt at moving down the value chain by controlling the distribution and retailing activities of the value chain. This does not appear to be an effective strategy since the competitive strength of the company has always been its…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Furrer, O. (2011). Corporate level strategy: Theory and applications. (p. 2). Routledge

Ireland, R.D., Hoskisson, R.E., & Hitt, M.A. (2009). Understanding business strategy: Concepts and cases. (p. 88). Cengage Learning

McKern, B. (2003). Managing the global network corporation. (p. 125). Routledge

O'Grady, T.P., & Malloch, K. (2010). Innovation Leadership. (p. 371). Jones & Bartlett Learning.


Cite this Document:

"Business And Corporate" (2012, August 10) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-and-corporate-109572

"Business And Corporate" 10 August 2012. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-and-corporate-109572>

"Business And Corporate", 10 August 2012, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-and-corporate-109572

Related Documents

Governmental CSR policies do not only assist consumers or organizations, they assist both the consumer and the organization (The Impact of Government Regulations on Corporate Social Responsibility - How Government Policies Shape CSR, 2009). It is often said that international environmental laws do not differ from one another. European environmental regulations are very similar to the U.S. environmental laws. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has set up a database

P&G has recognized that there are three pillars needed to support its sustainable development strategy. These include environmental protection, economic development, and social responsibility (MacNealy, 2007). Summary and Future Research Recommendations Procter and Gamble's commitment to sustainability has been shown by its development of new products. Product development is geared towards the preponderance of consumers who would like to improve sustainability outcomes without comprising value or quality. During 2008, Procter and

Any business that pursues making a profit at the expense of the society in which it operates will find its success to be nothing more than temporary (Chapter 1: Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Sustainability, n.d.). The idea of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is generally understood to imply that corporations have an amount of responsibility not only for the economic consequences of their activities, but also for the social and

Business -- Corporate Finance - Net Present Value - Mergers & Acquisitions -- SLP Facebook the Merger of Facebook, Inc. And Twitter, Inc. Choosing a company to merge with Facebook, Inc. is a difficult task because Facebook, Inc. is a huge, valuable, cutting-edge company. When forced to choose a prospect for merger, I would settle on Twitter, Inc. (Yahoo! Finance, 2013). First, both companies are in the Technology/Internet Information Provider field, so

Com was not their home page instead it was Google.com, digg.com and YouTube. It is important for corporations to take the time to keep up on what is showing up in the new social sites and search engines. New ideas that have arisen out of social media include: 1. Fish where the fish are. Don't build new communities and micro sites. Go where the people already are and 2. Keep

Corporate Social Responsibility Business Corporate social responsibility Corporate social responsibility involves a set of principles promoting the idea that business in general should be directed at assisting social progress through putting across ethical attitudes. Ethics has come to play an important role in the business environment in recent years and this influenced many to get actively engaged in considering this concept whenever doing business. Corporate social responsibility is meant to influence individuals