The fact that China tried to cut off exports of tea to the British -- unless the British would stop bringing in opium to China -- shows again that laws and morality in China were of higher importance than the economy. The war that ensued in 1839 (the first "Opium War") because the Chinese attempted to blockade the factories and keep the foreigners out. The British also won the second "Opium War" in China and the law changed in China to allow opium as a legitimate trading item. It took a war to get the Chinese in the right frame of mind to change the law.
This is a key to the argument put forward in this paper. The Chinese didn't seem at all bothered when their trading partners were banned from coming into the country due to laws and morality. So the economy has been hampered, so what? The Chinese seemed to say we have our rules, our values, our laws, and we're not going to back down even if it means a curtailing of the financial benefits that trade (even trade in opium) can bring to us.
Hong Kong was actually a colony, "a frontier boomtown," in Perdue's words. It was ruled by the British and frequented by the Americans and other foreigners. But Canton was a place that was owned by and ruled by the Chinese, and while it is easy to understand that they had a perfect right to protect their city, their population and their way of life, going to war to protect their values (at the risk of harming their economic system,...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now