Coca-Cola's Philanthropic Practices as a Successful Organizational Behavior And we cannot be about the business of training people to think and to act. We need that diversity to be in the education populace, to be the student body in all of the schools. So that's why it's important for us. We charge colleges and universities with not being islands unto themselves, but understanding that they have a responsibility to have a relationship with the feeder systems that provide their students." (Black Issues in Higher Education, 1997)
Coca-cola is an immensely successful corporation, and a large part of that success is owing to unbeatable brand recognition. No one asks for an "RC Cola," whereas everyone asks for a "Coke." Coke, a private brand, has become synonymous with that particular type of beverage -- something against which PepsiCola has had to struggle during its entire existence, especially in the United States.
But fortunate posturing in brand recognition does not go entirely to organizational behavior. Rather, Coke benefits from a corporate culture in which philanthropy is encouraged and indeed lived. Coke informs its employees constantly of its philanthropic moves and commitments, and really instills the feeling that employees are working not only for higher dividends but for humanity as well.
This practice has been so successful for Coke that it has turned into an organizational behavior for them -- it is almost as responsible for the company's profits as is the brand recognition.
This organizational behavior is evident in a recent interview of Ingrid Saunders Jones, head of the Coca-Cola Foundation.
Jones comments, "We are only as good a company as the people who work for our company. We're looking for the most qualified people that we can find. We must have a ...
Coca-cola, as part of its organizational behavior, understands the responsibility it has as a corporate citizen, and draws that responsibility from its people. It instills and trains its entire workforce to focus not only on corporate profits and dividends or their everyday tasks and chores, but on the concept of helping humanity from the success of its beverage manufacturing industries.
Coca-cola, as an advancement of their organizational behavior, also understands that it must trot its beliefs on philanthropy throughout society, as it must draw new employees to its ranks who share the same vision. As a result, Saunders comments at length upon the importance of plumbing colleges and universities for the next generation of philanthropic key and low-level Coca-Cola employees.
Saunders continues that Coca-Cola's philanthropic efforts will continue full-steam even if profits at the corporation are down -- this is a clear indication that philanthropy is not just a profit device but an organizational behavior. Coca-Cola truly believes that its corporation cannot succeed without a philanthropic background and a philanthropic motive throughout its ranks and organization.
And we cannot be about the business of training people to think and to act. We need that diversity to be in the education populace, to be the student body in all of the schools. So that's why it's important for us. We charge colleges and universities with not being islands unto themselves, but understanding that they have a responsibility to have a relationship with the feeder systems that provide their students." (Black Issues in Higher Education, 1997)
This modeled on the precedent here for healthy charitable contribution to active-living initiatives. Accordingly, from its $82 million raised in philanthropic funds, "$6.7 million or 18% was directed to innovative physical activity and nutrition education programs, ranging from the restoration of walking trails and biking paths through the National Park Foundation to support for the Great Fun2Run Program, a curriculum-based program in England that guides teachers, students and their
Branding and Communication There has been significant criticism leveled against the branding practices of companies, and most particularly those of multinationals, which have been raised. Drawing on the academic literature this work will identify the primary arguments used in these critiques and will critically examine those arguments and discuss their implications for branding in the age of globalization. This study will further answer the question of how branding has changed under
Corporate Social Responsibility: Bowen and Carroll Howard R. Bowen was the founder of the concept of corporate social responsibility. In his book "Social Responsibility of the Businessman," Bowen argued that business was a major force that touched the lives of numerous individuals. Since business was inextricably and continuously involved in processes of judgment and decision-making, many of their proposals and assertions touched the lives of vast numbers of citizens. These included
The enablers include the competence of the people, the culture of the corporation, internal development, worker engagement, efficient and effective communication, and innovative learning. Becker, B. & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (4), pp. 779-801. The research attempts to advance debates on a nascent link between the human resource systems and the strategic impact of human
In Japan for example, where Starbucks opened its first international outlet, the concept of group harmony and social cohesion is more important in business relations. In China the business relations revolve around personal relation while in Korea for example hierarchical relationships or obedience to authority becomes more crucial. In Northern Europe a participatory style of management is in place. Southern Europe on the other hand has workers that resent
Business Ethics Business Structure and Ethics in Organizational Behavior Business ethics can also be known as corporate ethics. It is described as a form of professional or applied ethics that helps in investigating ethical principles as well as moral or ethical problems that comes up within different business environment. Its application takes place within every aspects of business conduct and it is always of relevance to the individuals' conducts and the organization