How Coercive Airpower Shapes Strategies Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
670
Cite
Related Topics:

In spite of the considerable headway achieved in the African continent, a large number of states continue to experience political instability and turbulence, spilling into other areas. Numerous countries have been witnessing brutal extremism and jihadist terrorism. Such factions attacks are becoming increasingly more lethal, with recent attacks targeting Americas interests and its people, and expanding into new regions. The National Security Strategy continually collaborates with partners for defeating terror groups and other entities threatening the U.S. and its people (U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Nigeria para &8). The most important of all discussions on airpower application and theory, especially for non- uniformed individuals, are linked to airpowers employment in coercing enemies. A majority of notable classical airpower theorists concur that the best solution was strategic bombing: directly striking at opponents national power center, leading to swift victories and early reduction or elimination of the need for defeating opponents surface forces; however, this isnt the sole coercive airpower approach at ones disposal (Muller 7).

Strategic bombing, akin to war itself, is typically coercive in nature, attempting (generally together with other attack methods) at forcing the enemy to fulfill deterrent or compellent demands instead of merely destroying its capability of resisting or misbehaving altogether. Success might eventually necessitate destruction in the event coercive tactics prove unsuccessful. However, a majority of conflicts come to an end...…Iraqi, Afghan, Libyan and the most latest Yemeni operations. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles contribute significantly to psychological operations. Wherever they have been relied on, potential targets remain under constant fear that armed unmanned aerial vehicles might, at any given time, be able to strike (Fryar 52). The most technology- centered armed forces branch is the air force, which can employ its technological advantage asymmetrically. A key asymmetry has been offered with the introduction of stealth, which has been described as a surreptitious, secret, or clandestine procedure. Stealth applied to aircrafts results in a vehicle which cannot be easily detected by sight, radar or sound, thereby offering a clear edge when it comes to defeating…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works cited

Fryar, Gretchen. "The Air Power to Coerce: the role of air power in twenty?first century coercive diplomacy." Master of Philosophy thesis, The University of NSW at ADFA: Canberra(2012): 2.

Muller, Karl P. Air Power. RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE SANTA MONICA CA, 2010.

U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Nigeria. “National Security Strategy in a Regional Context - AFRICA.” U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Nigeria, ng.usembassy.gov/national-security-strategy-regional-context-africa/.


Cite this Document:

"How Coercive Airpower Shapes Strategies" (2018, July 03) Retrieved May 3, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/coercive-airpower-shapes-strategies-essay-2177740

"How Coercive Airpower Shapes Strategies" 03 July 2018. Web.3 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/coercive-airpower-shapes-strategies-essay-2177740>

"How Coercive Airpower Shapes Strategies", 03 July 2018, Accessed.3 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/coercive-airpower-shapes-strategies-essay-2177740

Related Documents

CFACC and AOC are, by their very nature, located several hundred, sometimes thousands of miles from the air battle. And, as emphasized prior, we understand that technology allows command far more specific details than in the history of the military. That being said, no amount of technology can translate a blip on a screen to an actual threat, and react with the appropriate response within milliseconds. One would think,

Since Airpower entered the scene as an element of military power in World War I, war is no longer what it used to be. Air power has introduced technology-enabled capabilities and its impact on warfare has been enormous. The impact of airpower technology on war has been wrongly perceived by some. When it was first used in World War I, the observation and surveillance capabilities of air power very rapidly

Billy Mitchell and Airpower During the interwar period a number people advocated major changes in military doctrine and organizations, particularly in the use of airpower. Three important airpower advocates were Giulio Douhet, Hugh Trenchard, and Billy Mitchell, who all insisted that the air arm should be independent of the army and navy. Trenchard in fact was the commander of the first independent air force in the world, the Royal Air Force

AirPower capabilities have made it the “easy call” I agree with what you say about the article by John Garofano. Senior military leaders need to have a combination of both military analysis and political relevancies. However, I believe that there is also a need to have a critical analysis of the importance of airpower before any deployment. Military leaders will receive gratification only if they properly understand the cost implications of

Introduction Major wars have almost always resulted in nations and enemies trying to come up with new strategies and weapons to perform even better next time. This phenomenon has made it interesting to try and predict how future wars will be fought. Many military and conflict scholars have written theories that have attempted to predict how future wars will be fought. Perhaps the most renowned among them is Carl von Clausewitz.