S.A. And other regions, Pepsi has tended to target generation X or the younger generation. This has led to the view that the Pepsi brand and marketing is aimed more at the youth segment of the market; as the slogan "Pepsi generation" would suggest (Comparative Analysis of Pepsi and Coke). However, there is conjecture about its overall position in relation to Pepsi. One of the reasons for Coca-Cola's apparent advantage over Pepsi is that it has a longer history and therefore that its image and brand is more ensconced in the culture and mind of the consumer. It has also achieved a dominating position as a result of its flexible and effective distribution and marketing system. "Coca-Cola's bottling system is one of their greatest strengths. It allows them to conduct business on a global scale while at the same time maintain a local approach" ( SWOT n Pest Analysis of Nestle and Coca Cola). Pepsi on the other hand has shown a tendency in branding and marketing to engage the younger sector of the consumer market.
Pepsi has also changed the colors and image of its brand more than Coke, possibly in order to attract the youth market. Pepsi has "…associated itself with rich deep blue color as blue color represents eternal youthfulness and openness that is appropriately consistence with the youth segment they are targeting" "(Mittal et al. 2008). The rationale behind this is that the labeling of the product helps the brand to become accepted by the targeted marketing segment. This difference in segmentation is supported by the view that,
Even with Coke's best-of-breed worldwide distribution system, there always was a feeling that the soda wasn't as connected to the kids as it should be given the beverage's long history and famed reputation for being a valued member of the Americana. (Battle of the Brands: Coke vs. Pepsi)
However, studies also indicate that, "Coke retains a significant advantage over Pepsi in terms of brand equity, and this is evident even with younger people" (Battle of the Brands: Coke vs. Pepsi). Studies also indicate that Coke has the edge over Pepsi in terms of marketing equity: "PepsiCo was valued at $110 billion; Coca-Cola's market cap, on the other hand, was near $140 billion" (Battle of the Brands: Coke vs. Pepsi).
There are also differences with regard to gender-based segmentation of the market. Coco-Cola for example has targeted its beverages with a lighter taste, such as Fanta, towards the female sectors as well as the very young demographic. Another important aspect of brand marketing is the realization of the differences between rural and urban consumer needs. In this regard, Coke is one of the first companies to have realized the importance of the rural markets. One of the differences that have been catered for in regard is price as opposed to quality. It has been found that the population of the rural sector is "…more conscious more about the price whereas the population of Urban sector is more conscious about the quality and brand name of the product" (Mittal, 2008). As a result both Coca Cola and Pepsi have adopted different strategies to market to these sectors of the population.
The Importance of branding is supported by modern science. This refers to the view that the "… preference for Coke vs. Pepsi is not only a matter for the tongue to decide" (Coke vs. Pepsi: It's all in the head). In other words, choosing one brand over another has a lot to do with the perception of what one is drinking, as well as taste. Preference also has been found to be linked to "…memory-related brain regions that recall cultural influences" ( Coke vs. Pepsi: It's all in the head). This means that brand images and their associations affect perceptions and preferences for the product. Choices are affected by perception because "there are visual images and marketing messages that have insinuated themselves into the nervous systems of humans that consume the drinks" (Coke vs. Pepsi: It's all in the head).
In terms of ...
Both these market leaders however have to continually be aware of challenges and threats to their brand dominance. Among these is the threat of substitutes that could put pressure on their market share. More significantly, changes in consumer consciousness pose continual challenges to these companies. "Even though Coca-Cola and Pepsi control nearly 40% of the entire beverage market, the changing health-consciousness of the market could have a serious affect" (Coca-Cola Case Study). Health trends or a number of other variables are apects that both Pepsi and Coca- Cola have to be continually aware of.
A Brief Pepsi History. Retrieved from http://www.sirpepsi.com/pepsi11.htm
Battle of the Brands: Coke vs. Pepsi. Retrieved from http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/battle-of-the-brands-coke-vs.-pepsi/
Bettman, et al. (1998) Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer
Research 25(3), pp. 187-217
Brand Equity: Coke vs. Pepsi. Retrieved from http://www.nineteenfortyone.com/2010/05/brand-equity-coke-vs.-pepsi/
Business Profile. Retrieved from http://www.thecocacolacompany.com/citizenship/pdf/SR08_BusProf_4.pdf
Case Study Coca Cola strategy. Strategies for Americas, Asia and Africa. Retrieved from http://en.reingex.com/en115coca.asp
Coca Cola 78. Retrieved from http://hubpages.com/hub/Coca-Cola-0
Coca-Cola Case Study. Retrieved from http://www.***.com/view.asp?id=23720
Coke vs. Pepsi: It's all in the head. Retrieved from http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-10/cp-cvp101204.php
Comparative Analysis of Pepsi and Coke. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/18282216/Coparative-Analysis-of-Pepsi-and-Coke
Levis D. ( 2005) Marketing Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.articlealley.com/article_5701_3.html
Mittasl A. et al. ( 2008) ANALYSIS OF MARKETING STRATEGY OF
COCA COLA AND PEPSICO. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/20596818/analysis-of-marketing-strategy-of-coca-cola-and-pepsi.
SinghK. Marketing communications management. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/32857938/Marketing-Communication-of-coca-cola
SWOT n Pest Analysis of Nestle and Coca Cola. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/22274938/SWOT-n-Pest-Analysis-of-Nestle-and-Coca-Cola
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY ENGAGES IN MORE THAN 50 COUNTRIES TO "TURN
OUT" SUPPORT FOR EARTH HOUR. Retrieved from http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/presscenter/nr_20090326_earth_hour.html
Yogi B. Coca-Cola Magic: 21 Business Lessons. Retrieved from http://www.nepalnews.com/contents/englishmonthly/businessage/2004/jan/management.htm
Wookfolk, Mary E., William Castellan, and Charles I. Brooks. 1983. "Pepsi vs. Coke: Labels, Not Tastes, Prevail." Psychological Reports 52 (February): 185-186.
This picture may vary from region to region.
However, there is conjecture about its overall position in relation to Pepsi. One of the reasons for Coca-Cola's apparent advantage over Pepsi is that it has a longer history and therefore that its image and brand is more ensconced in the culture and mind of the consumer. It has also achieved a dominating position as a result of its flexible and effective distribution and marketing system. "Coca-Cola's bottling system is one of their greatest strengths. It allows them to conduct business on a global scale while at the same time maintain a local approach" ( SWOT n Pest Analysis of Nestle and Coca Cola). Pepsi on the other hand has shown a tendency in branding and marketing to engage the younger sector of the consumer market.
Coke and Pepsi Advertising Strategy Pepsi's advertising and promotional strategies in India Coke's advertising and promotional strategies in India Why advertising and promotional strategies vary from country to country and whether culture influences this Any advertising strategy that an organization comes up with should be tailored to catch the attention of the consumers and make them change their behaviors. Such strategies put an organization in a position to impact on their target markets especially
In September 1996, a mutual fund manager who had over 3 million shares in PepsiCo had told the CEO that no one understood why the restaurant group was not being sold off while the group was not being run efficiently. He had also mentioned that it did not fit in with other business of PepsiCo. Thus it is clear that the CEO of PepsiCo knows the reason, but is
marketing strategies of Coca-Cola and Pepsi in Thailand and UK Coca-Cola and Pepsi, rated among the top companies in the world share a common fact - for several years, both these companies have been successfully selling a simple product made of water and sugar to almost all countries. This would have been impossible unless the companies were able to create sustained excitement over their products and brands among the people
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 Harvard Business Case 9-711-462 Five Forces in the cola industry: Porter's Five Forces Framework Power of buyers For concentrate owners: Strong. The power of buyers is extremely strong within the soda industry, given that consumers can quickly shift their alliance from one beverage to another. Also, cola is not strictly a 'necessity' as a product -- no one needs to drink soda, and consumers can easily
Marketing Mass marketing is differentiated from target marketing, in that the target customer is pretty much everybody. A firm that has a target market will either have all of its sales, or a significant portion of them, in an specific identifiable group. Thus, the product should span across race, gender, age and geography. Such a product's target market would be better understood in terms of who doesn't buy it than who
Another issue is the fact that our nation's schools are failing to provide students with healthy foods in our in-school lunch programs. The school programs are making little effort to structure their menus so that the daily nutritional requirements as proscribed by the United States Department of Agriculture are being addressed. Again, funding is cited as the problem but a strong argument can be made that convenience is more properly