As reported by Jameson, conflict is an inevitable part of a system in which human beings are required to cooperate in order to achieve goals. Further, Jameson's analysis of conflict as having different typologies also appears to be relevant. Analysis of one's personal life provides indications that there are different types of conflicts and that there are different types of resolutions that must be employed in order to resolve conflict. Given that conflict can have such a negative impact on the organization, its operations, employee morale and productivity, organizations need to have some understanding of conflict and the specific steps that can be taken to resolve conflict.
While there appears to be strong evidence which suggests the need for the organization to understand conflict, it is important to consider this analysis in the context of the autocratic organization. Mittler (2007) in his review of autocratic management argues that this style of management is one in which the manager is responsible for decision making at all levels. Managers make decisions and employees follow through, without any discussion of the decisions that impact employees. In this context it would seem that conflict resolution is quite simple as the manager has the final say in a conflict. While this approach provides definitive resolution to explicit conflicts, the reality is that the autocratic approach to conflict resolution may create more problems that it actually resolves.
References
Jameson, J.K. (1999). Toward a comprehensive model for the assessment and management of intraorganizational conflict: Developing the framework. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(3), 268-295.
Mittler, J.E. (2007). Know your management rights. Industrial Management, 49(3), 26-30.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now