Conflict Management In The Working Environment Essay

PAGES
11
WORDS
3242
Cite

Conflict Management in the Workplace Conflicts have become increasingly inevitable in the contemporary working environment because of the diverse nature of the workforce. Actually, the modern workplace is a hub of diverse cultures largely because of globalization. Globalization has contributed to workplace diversity through facilitating increased migration of people who are looking for better market opportunities, personal development, and new challenges (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015, p.13). These changes have generated numerous conflict situations, which has resulted in dramatic changes to the perception of conflict. Since conflict has increased in today's working environment, conflict management has emerged as one of the most important issues for managers and other organizational stakeholders. Managers are increasingly faced with the need to identify and established effective conflict management techniques.

Conflict in the Workplace

In the past 20 years, the perception of conflict in the working environment has changed significantly because of the numerous changes in the workplace. Prause & Mujtaba (2013) contend that globalization is the major factor that has generated changes in the workplace, which have in turned increased conflicts (p.13). These conflicts emerge from the fact that globalization has resulted in higher migration of individuals who are pursuing career development and new challenges and opportunities.

The other factor contributing to increased conflicts in the workplace is the new millennium, which has offered several challenges and opportunities for businesses. Today's world is increasingly complex given the increase in diversity that has made nearly four generations to work side by side (Deyoe & Fox, n.d.). Since each of these generations are characterized by unique characteristics, several conflicts emerge as they interact with each other in the working environment.

According to Singleton et al. (2011), conflicts in the workplace are brought by the fact that people must communicate and interact with each other (p.149). Similar to every other environment, conflict is bound to happen in the workplace as people interact and communicate. This implies that conflict is inevitable in personal and professional lives of individuals. Based on this factor, workplace conflicts are brought by personality clashes and egos between employees. Conflict is primarily a natural by-product of interactions and communication between people as they seek to accomplish their personal and organizational goals.

In some cases, conflict in the workplace is a consequence of the nature of the working environment. Based on the findings of a survey, workplace conflict is sometimes brought by stress and heavy workloads (Singleton et al., 2011, p.149). In this case, conflicts are viewed as measures through which individuals express their frustrations and concerns regarding their working environment.

The other aspect of the nature of the workplace that is considered as a contributor to conflict is teams. Teams are famous means that are used by organizations across the globe to achieve organizational goals. Teams are considered advantageous in the working environment for various reasons including enhancing quality, lessening costs, and developing new products (Alper, Tjosvold & Law, 2000, p.625). As teams work towards achievement of organizational goals, they deal with several issues and challenges that in turn generate conflicts. When working in teams, conflicts emerge when people's behavior or actions infringe the organization's social norms or the rules and regulations of the organization. In most cases, such conflicts arise from differences in personalities, opinions, experience, knowledge, and education.

Singleton et al. (2011) contend that there are two types of workplace conflicts i.e. functional conflict and dysfunctional conflict. These two types of conflicts do not exist different from each other because organizations tend to have varying degrees of each of them. Functional conflict comes from differences in opinions, natural diversity, differences in project or process, rapid change, and work teams. Dysfunctional conflict arise from dysfunctional work teams, system problems, heavy workloads, favoritism, unfavorable work culture, warring egos, ineffective bureaucracy, and obnoxious people (Singleton et al., 2011, p.151).

Conflict Management Techniques in the Workplace

While conflicts are bound to happen in the workplace, they can have devastating impacts on organizational performance and productivity. Conflict in the workplace is endemic because of the nature of the working environment and interactions taking place among employees. Given the inevitability of conflict and its potential impact, managers and leaders in the working environment are faced with the need to identify suitable conflict management techniques.

Conflict management in the workplace involves developing effective measures to lessen the impact of conflict and enhance organizational productivity. Conflict management strategies are also used to improve the constructive functions so that the organization can optimize learning and effectiveness. Through designing strategies, an organization does not avoid the conflict but find effective ways of dealing with it. Therefore, conflict management in the workplace is a means through which...

...

First, organizational leaders or managers need to determine how the conflict can be brought out in the open in order to be dealt with. Secondly, these leaders must examine the best possible means for people to understand each other's perspective. Third, leaders should examine how trust can be developed in order for emerging conflicts to be more functional rather than dysfunctional. Fourth, leaders should identify how people with varying conflict resolution abilities can be used to teach others. These four considerations have always been used as the premise for determining a suitable conflict management strategy.
Apart from these vital considerations, conflict management in the workplace also entails several activities including problem solving, communication, handling emotions, and understanding people's positions. This wide range of activities is geared towards promoting healthy dialogue and ensuring positive interpersonal skills. Techniques that are commonly used to handle or resolve workplace conflicts are classified into two major categories i.e. integrative strategies and avoidance or distributive strategies.

Integrative Strategies for Conflict Management

Organizational leaders handle conflicts through integrative strategies, which are also known as social-oriented, collaborating, or problem-solving techniques. These strategies are used to initiate open communication, solve problems, or ensure information sharing when dealing with the conflict and afterwards (Singleton et al., 2011, p.153). There are several integrative strategies for managing conflict in the workplace including

Collaboration

One of the techniques that have commonly been used to manage conflicts in the working environment is collaboration. This is an integrative strategy since it focuses on promoting healthy relationships between organizational members or employees through resolving the underlying issue. Moreover, collaboration is an integrative strategy because it focuses on solving the problem. Collaboration involves working together to find a solution that will satisfy all parties or individuals involved in the conflict. Based on existing definitions and analysis, collaboration technique in conflict management can be described as cooperation with every party to express and listen to concerns with the aim of identifying a mutually satisfactory solution (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015, p.19). In most cases, this conflict management technique is described as a win-win approach since the views of each party in the conflict are taken into consideration during conflict resolution. The advantages of this integrative approach include the fact that it incorporates each party's wishes, widens the scope of usual solutions, and examines all ideas to develop a fresh outcome.

Brubaker et al. (2014), state that collaborative process and approaches to conflict resolution have become common in organizations or workplaces across the world, especially in North America (p.357). The most common collaborative approaches include coaching and mediation that are used to lessen the impacts of unresolved conflict on organizational performance and productivity. To achieve this goal, organizations, especially large organizations, have established an ombudsman who is tasked with the responsibility of identifying at least one conflict management approach that is suitable in handling an issue.

McAllum (2013) view collaboration as a participation-based conflict management system, which examines conflict from an interpersonal and intra- or inter-organizational perspective or level (p.53). The core of participation-based conflict management system such as collaboration is relationships and the belief that involvement generates personal, organizational, and societal benefits. Through participation-based system, conflict is resolved by creating a collaborative organizational culture that helps enhance an organization's operations and improve the quality of life of its employees or members. Conflicts are viewed as natural processes that require participation or collaboration instead of discrete episodes or events that emerge outside the organization's norms and processes.

Accommodating

The second integrative conflict resolution approach is accommodating, which is a problem solving technique that works when parties to a conflict cooperate well (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015, p.18). This approach to conflict resolution involves neglecting a person's concerns in favor of the concerns of others. When neglecting a person's concerns in favor of another's, one of the members in the conflict management process is an expert in the specific issue being examined. This expert provides the most suitable solution even if it contradicts a person's goals and desired outcomes.

Brubaker et al. (2014) considers accommodating as part of collaborative processes in conflict management since it primarily involves mediation by an expert or organizational ombudsman (p.357). The increased use of this conflict management technique has contributed to the growth of pre-mediation coaching. Through…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Alper, S., Tjosvold, D. & Law, K.S. (2000). Conflict Management, Efficacy, and Performance in Organizational Teams. Personnel Psychology, 53,625-642.

Bang, H. & Park, J.G. (2015). The Double-edged Sword of Task Conflict: It's Impact on Team Performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 43(5), 715-728.

Brubaker et al. (2014). Conflict Resolution in the Workplace: What Will the Future Bring? Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 31(4), 357-386.

Choi, Y. (2013). The Influence of Conflict Management Culture on Job Satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality, 41(4), 687-692.
Deyoe, R.H. & Fox, T.L. (n.d.). Identifying Strategies to Minimize Workplace Conflict Due to Generational Differences. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business. Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/121132.pdf


Cite this Document:

"Conflict Management In The Working Environment" (2016, June 27) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-management-in-the-working-environment-2158125

"Conflict Management In The Working Environment" 27 June 2016. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-management-in-the-working-environment-2158125>

"Conflict Management In The Working Environment", 27 June 2016, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-management-in-the-working-environment-2158125

Related Documents

Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution in Literature review "The Administrative Power Grab" attempts to manage the conflict between the power that the leader posses and the ability to use that power properly. On the one hand, some leaders utilize the power that they have to act as tyrants which leads to greater conflict within the school because people believe that their opinions are not being heard or implemented into the overall

Similarly operational efficiency is crucial for control but too authoritative approach to a controlled culture is no more feasible in the current business environment because it stifles creativity and hinders employee freedom affecting overall business performance. Innovation and setting benchmarks and preparing people to achieve such high standards become the hallmark of organizations that strive for competence. Lastly cultivation culture is about stirring the lives of customers and employees

Conflict Management: Case Evaluation According to Wall & Callister (1995), conflict may occur at the interpersonal level in which an individual comes into conflict with others. Perhaps, conflict may occur at the intergroup level, whereby some level of contention exists between or among groups. Last, conflict may occur between or among organizations, which is known as interorganizational. Regardless of the level, experiencing conflict breeds frustration, anxiety, and the dreaded fear of

In reviewing the main considerations that define conflict management situations and in making a determination which strategy has a likelihood of being effective the factors to be considered are: Issue Importance Relationship Importance Relative Power It is important to consider the importance of the issue, which has been done and although the conflict is centered around important issues the resolution is not one that lack of resolve creates immediate demand of resolution through force.

The stress is, therefore, it is directed to the wrong person, but in normal circumstances, it's never like that. This is a perfect example of hyper-stress caused by built up pressure at work and the expectation to deliver. The situation can be resolved by taking stress relieving activities that include engaging oneself in regular exercises, engaging in good talks with friends, eating sensibly, having enough rest and accepting situations that one

This naturally tends to exacerbate the tension and increase the potential for conflict; as with many competing visions and views there are bound to be differences of opinion and consequently conflict between different individuals." As a result many people in many organizations are forced to invent their own corporate vision. When you have different versions of goals, direction, and values among different individuals and groups, you increase the probability