Copyleft Is An Interesting, Fairly Research Proposal

Two writers note, "By allowing others to use their work, collaborations, critique, and collective projects that were previously difficult to achieve can now take place" (Berry and McCallion). Supporters also believe that copyright limits the creative process and does not allow creators to build on platforms that already exist. The future of the technology seems wide open, as more people embrace the idea of free software and other items. As more people question the adaptability of copyright, copyleft will continue to grow and prosper. There are many barriers to open adoption of copyleft, because many software developers and others are reluctant to give up their rights and make a program free. Many developers make the bulk of their income from developing proprietary software and other products, so this is easy to understand. However, the technology...

...

It has a strong following, and it would seem that as business conditions continue to change and grow, it will become more popular in the future.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Editors. "What is Copyleft?" GNU.org. 2009. 18 March 2009. http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/.

Berry, David M. And McCallion, Marcus. "Time to Examine the Debates About the Ownership of Intellectual Property." Eye. 2001. 18 March 2009. http://www.eyemagazine.com/opinion.php?id=117&oid=290

Lillington, Karlin. "In Defense of Copyleft." Wired.com. 2001. 18 March 2009. http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2001/02/41679.


Cite this Document:

"Copyleft Is An Interesting Fairly" (2009, March 18) Retrieved May 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/copyleft-is-an-interesting-fairly-23835

"Copyleft Is An Interesting Fairly" 18 March 2009. Web.19 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/copyleft-is-an-interesting-fairly-23835>

"Copyleft Is An Interesting Fairly", 18 March 2009, Accessed.19 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/copyleft-is-an-interesting-fairly-23835

Related Documents
Copyright Basics
PAGES 6 WORDS 1888

Copyright Basics Copyright law is designed and enacted to protect artists and other creators. Just as an inventor deserves to patent an invention, an artist deserves the right to own created material including but not limited to film, photography, music, and writing. Although copyright law in many cases ignores the rights of consumers to do as they please with materials they legally purchased, American federal and state statutes do the best

Copyright Law in Hong Kong Internationally, Hong Kong has been obligated to protect copyright pursuant to various international as well as domestic copyright conventions which apply to Hong Kong. Amongst the importance of intellectual property right, copyright as well has been recognized under Article 15(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and cultural rights (ICESCR) specifying that "The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone… to

Copyright Law and the Music
PAGES 25 WORDS 9076

As technology and the capability of removing artifacts from recordings improve this area of the law will be likely to be revisited in the future. This last revision to copyright law raised more questions than it answered. For instance, was it acceptable to colorize black and white movies? Did this alter them from the original work, or was this an acceptable? Was it OK to alter pieces of work to

Copyright Laws vs. Peer-to-Peer File Transfer This paper presents a detailed examination of copyright laws, with a comparison to peer-to-peer file transfer. The author will take the reader on an exploratory journey, in which the details and outcomes of several well-known cases will be scrutinized. The author will also discuss the importance of copyright laws, and the elements of various cases that caused the rulings to go the way they did.

The student enters an illustration contest, and wins first place. The first place prize is a $5,000 check. The student is sued for copyright infringement. In this case, the use of the illustration was done as a commercial venture, yet was also done as a criticism, something quite obviously protected by Section 107. The use of the copyrighted material may have damaged the market in which the tuna company operated,

In order to take refugee from these invalid assertions, she made a fair use claim for all the material that had copyrights. The video was only twenty nine seconds long and the music was near to being audible for only twenty seconds. If these fair use claim wouldn't have been made an innocent women and her family would have been sued for doing something that they didn't do intentionally.