Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Rally Round the Trade Name
Explain whether or not the fact that Gabby's surname is Rally gives her the right to use it any way she wishes.
The mere fact that Gabby's surname is Rally does not give her the right to use the name in any means of her choosing. A person's name, alone cannot be trademarked. "Personal names (actual names and pseudonyms) of individuals or groups function as marks only if they identify and distinguish the services recited and not merely the individual or group" (United States Patent and Trademark Office, n.d., para. 1). Furthermore, if another company was using the name Rally and had documented a viable trademark claim, that company would have priority use of the mark, despite Gabby's personal connection to the name.
Victor Moseley incorporated his first name into his adult novelty store name, Victor's Little Secret, much to the chagrin of the well-known brand Victoria's Secret. During the 2003 case of Victor's Little Secret vs. Victoria's Secret, Victoria's Secret was forced to prove that the trademark had been diluted causing a monetary loss (Moseley, dba Victor's Little Secret v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 2003). After the passing of Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006, dilution no longer requires hard proof; the fact that dilution is likely is sufficient for an injunction (GovTrack, 2006). As the requirement of proof of dilution has been lifted for famous brands, Victor can no longer use the name Victor's Little Secret.
Samantha Lundberg, formerly Samantha Bucks can also attest to the fact that a personal name does not guarantee trademark ownership. Sued by Starbucks for trademark...
The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 was intended to enable the owner's of famous trademarks to maintain the value of their intellectual property. The owner of a non-famous trademark or trade name would have a greater burden of proof.
Explain whether or not it matters that Rally is associated with pizza.
The fact that Rally's Pizza sells pizza and Rally Motors is an auto dealership provides plenty of room for each company to use the word Rally in their business names. The products and services are so very different that it is unlikely a customer is going to be confused and think that he or she could purchase a vehicle from Rally's Pizza. The fact that the phone company has made a few mistakes by giving out the wrong number does not prove that the consumers are confused about the service marks.
If Rally Motors and Rally's Pizza were both nationally used service marks that could be trademarked with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Rally's Pizza would doubtfully be declined based on the use of the word Rally. "To find a conflict, the marks do not have to be identical and the goods/services do not have to be the same. It may be enough that the marks are similar and the goods/services are related." (United States Patent and Trademark Office, 2010, p. 13). The goods and services provided by these two businesses are in no way related, so as…
References
Moseley, dba Victor's Little Secret v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. (2003). 537 U.S. 418, 633. Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/01-1015.ZS.html
GovTrack. (2006). H.R. 683: Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006. Retrieved from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-683
Stossel, J. & Goldberg, A.B. (2005). Starbucks vs. Sambucks Coffee. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/2020/GiveMeABreak/story?id=1390867
United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2010). Basic facts about trademarks. Retrieved from http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/index.jsp
United States Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). Service marks, collective marks, and certification marks. Chapter 1301.02(b). Retrieved from http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/1300.htm#_T130102b
However, the rights have some confinements incorporating the limitations and other considerations of issues like their contradiction with the fundamental rights and the codified provisions in force. The legal issues involving intellectual property rights have two dimensions. Firstly, those that provide exclusive rights only in the sphere of copying / reproduction of the item or act safeguarded and secondly, those which provide a right to deter others from doing
Research: As we can see in the preliminary discussion above, in the face of the extension of copyright and patent-heavy cultures from western nations to global trade relationships, the very conflict between capitalism and social progressivism is implicated. Indeed, many socially conscious global economic groups are protesting international intellectual property laws that they say are burdensome to developing economies and which favor the sense of entitlement and ownership typically reserved for
Intellectual Property Rights: Article SummaryThe article details the various forms of intellectual property protection, the disadvantages of intellectual property protections, and why it is still beneficial to have such protections as a means to guard the ownership and use of other people�s inventions. The main forms of intellectual property protection are trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, patents, and knowhow agreements. Different forms of intellectual property protection work in different ways. For
China & IP My research topic is intellectual property rights in China. My thesis is that China needs to strengthen its protection of intellectual property rights in order to improve its integration with the global economic system. I will argue this point on the basis that China's current level of intellectual property rights protection is inadequate. I have chosen this topic because it a highly topical within the business world. China is
China IP China's intellectual property rights protections have come a long way since 1978, but there remains room for improvement. While the de jure situation with respect to protecting intellectual property rights approaches Western standards, the enforcement or de facto situation is less encouraging. Western companies have a difficult time enforcing the patchwork of laws and often fail to win judgments significantly large to serve as a deterrent to IP thieves. There
managers protect intellectual property rights in China using de facto strategies" by Keupp, Beckenbauer and Gassmann. It was published in R&D Management in 2009 and the full text is available online at http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/EXPORT/DL/53574.pdf The authors begin with the premise that intellectual property rights are not as well-protected in emerging markets as they are in Western countries. In China, the authors note, social norms give the country a view on intellectual