Critical appraisal of the SHARP acupuncture hypertension clinical trial
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
¶ … Scientific Admissibility and Merit of Published Articles
CRITICAL APPRAISAL FORM
Section a: Reference of Article
Eric a. Macklin, Peter M. Wayne, Leslie a. Kalish, Peter Valaskatgis, James Thompson, May C.M. Pian-Smith, Qunhao Zhang, Stephanie Stevens, Christine Goertz, Ronald J. Prineas, Beverly Buczynski, Randall M. Zusman
Stop Hypertension with the Acupuncture Research Program (SHARP): Results of a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal: Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association
Volume and Page Numbers: Vol. 48;
General Methodological Issues
For each criterion, check the appropriate box, according to how you think it is addressed: (Y=yes, S=substandard, N=No, NA=Not applicable, NQ=Not Qualified to Assess)
Criteria
NQ
Comments priori hypothesis clearly stated
Source population identified
Inclusion criteria described and appropriate (same in all groups)
Exclusion criteria described and appropriate (same in all groups)
Number of excluded or refusal (before study) reported
Withdrawals (during study) reported, explained, and reasonable
Withdrawals equal in groups
Sample size preplanned to provide adequate statistical power
Statistical analysis appropriate
Adjustment for multiple comparisons
Adjustment for important values
Results verifiable from raw data
Section G: Brief Summary of Paper: Descriptive information (short sentences)
Treatments being compared:
Check: [ two treatment arms [ great than two treatment arms
Design:
Check: [x] efficacy trial [ effectiveness trial
Method of assignment to treatment group: Random, stratified according to use of antihypertensives in previous six months.
Outcomes ascertained: BP increased modestly between measurements taken before and after an acupuncture session (by 2.1/0.8 mm Hg for a participant with pre-acupuncture BP of 143/88 mm Hg). No significant difference was found in the immediate effect of active vs. sham acupuncture. The risk of developing BP levels that required initiation of antihypertensive drugs did not differ significantly among participants randomly assigned to the 3 treatment groups. During follow-up, 2 STD participants experienced hypertensive urgencies, and 1 CNTL participant experienced congestive heart failure. No deaths occurred. The risk of any (n=98) or study-related (n=50) adverse events did not differ among treatment groups.
Main Source of Subjects: Subjects were recruited from outpatient clinics, referrals from Boston-area physicians, advertising in local periodicals and public transportation, and through mass mailings.
Inclusion Criteria: Untreated blood pressure (BP) of 140/90 to 179/109 mm Hg. No acupuncture in the previous six months.
Exclusion Criteria: Less than 18 years of age. Medical contraindications to acupuncture. Those individuals lacking follow-up data were subsequently excluded.
Main Source of Data: TCM individualized (IND), TCM standardized (STD), or control (CNTL) acupuncture
Duration of follow-up: 35 to 65 days
Number considered for enrollment: 424
Number enrolled: 192
Number included in analysis: 188
Statistic methods: linear mixed model; subgroup analyses for age, race, gender, baseline BP, history of antihypertensive use, obesity, primary TCM diagnoses
Other relevant information:
Strengths of Paper
Treatment randomization and BP responses were effectively masked thanks to the usage of separate diagnosing and treating acupuncturists, as well as the use of an independent vascular medicine team. This gives the results validity. Thanks to the inclusion of STD and IND treatment groups, the differential benefit of the three acupuncture treatments could be effectively evaluated. Careful blood pressure monitoring throughout, clear eligibility criteria, and objective randomization all contribute to the effectiveness of the presentation and the validity of the results.
Weaknesses of Paper
The SHARP trial was not designed for the detection of small effects. For subjects with stage 2 hypertension, the use of acupuncture without the use of antihypertensives is not reflective of usual practice among acupuncturists. In general, further research is required in order to determine whether acupuncture enhances the management of hypertension when used in combination with antihypertensives.
Reviewer's conclusions (if different from author's)
Clinical Relevance
Highly relevant [
Relevant [x]
Questionable relevant [
Irrelevant [
Not qualified to evaluate [
Scientific Merit
Very good [x]
Good [
Scientifically admissible [
Scientifically inadmissible [
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.