According to Illich (1968), hypocrisy is, perhaps, an instinctive trait shared by majority of Americans. They are mentally prepared to accept that the motives of potentially legitimizing the 1963 international volunteer action are not applicable when it comes to performing the very same act five years later. “Mission vacations” involving the poor people of Mexico was the trend among wealthy American students during the initial half of the decade. Emotional concerns for the just-found poverty beyond the nation’s southern border, together with utter thoughtlessness to the far severer state of the domestic poor, warranted this benevolence. Intellectual understanding of the challenges linked to successful volunteer action failed to dull the spirits of the soi-disant volunteers, papal volunteers, and Peace Corps (Illich, 1968).
Illich (1968) believed the presence of institutions such as the Conference on InterAmerican Student Projects was actually insulting to the Mexican nation. He claimed he felt revolted by the whole thing and believed their actions and good intentions were not interrelated. To him, the theological idea of good intentions can help no one. Indeed, according to the Irish, good intentions mark the way to hell, which summarizes this theological understanding. However, he did state that he had profound faith in American volunteers’ good will (Illich, 1968).

This, though, may be explained through a terrible want of innate delicacy. By their very nature, Americans can’t help eventually being vacation salesmen for a bourgeois American lifestyle as they know no other life. Such a group couldn’t be conceived if there was no relevant ‘mood’ created in America in support of the notion that a true American has to share the blessings of the Almighty with underprivileged humans. The notion that all Americans have a few things to give, which they always must, explains the decision of students of that period to spend some months in Mexican villages and aid their farmers to develop (Illich, 1968).

After weapons and money, American idealists are the third greatest export of North America; they can be found in all arenas: teaching, voluntary work, missionary work, economic development, community organization, and vacationing altruism. Ideally, their role may be defined as service. In fact, they often alleviate the destruction wreaked by weapons and money, or attract third-world societies to the advantages of a world of accomplishment and prosperity. At this point, Illich (1968) feels that we had rather emphasize to Americans that their lifestyle is simply not sufficiently alive to share with all (Illich, 1968).

America can only survive if it persuades the remainder of the planet that it is a sort of ‘Heaven on Earth’, in Illich’s (1968) opinion. Its survival is contingent on the universal acknowledgment by the world’s “free” people that its bourgeois society has attained their goals. The American lifestyle, to the speaker, had grown into a religion that had to be adopted by everyone who wished not to perish by weapons like the napalm or sword. America has been striving worldwide to safeguard and develop minorities who consume that which is affordable to the American majority. This was the aim of the Latin America-United States bourgeois Alliance for Progress (AFP). However, this business association increasingly requires protection by weapons that enable the minority capable of “making it” to safeguard their accomplishments and procurements (Illich, 1968).

The AFP has garnered considerable success within the Latin American region in terms of increasing the share of individuals who have become more affluent (that is, the small share of bourgeois elites), besides giving rise to ideal military dictatorship conditions. Initially, the dictators served plantation owners; however, they currently defend the novel industrial complexes. Illich (1968) asserts that the American students aid Mexican underdogs in accepting their destiny....…trust between healthcare facility workers and Hmong community members. Further, facility employees have reconsidered care-related points in which Hmong community healers can be included; currently, they perform around eighty-five rituals and interventions. Such a cross-cultural marriage of biomedical technology and cultural beliefs may forge trust and relationships between communities from one case to the next (Brinkmann, 2018).

Physician-patient relations are grounded in layers of faith. It is taken for granted by patients, in general, that all professionals possess requisite abilities and knowledge for adequately performing their roles. Patients enter into therapeutic relationships with competence being the first trust level. While physicians normally don’t have to earn this facet of trust, it may be lost (e.g., if any significant/fatal error occurs on the part of the physician). The technical competence expectation is backed by ethical codes, professional role-regulating rules, and institutional procedures. As this constitutes the minimal trust level, clearly, forging an effective client-provider relationship which generates wellbeing or restoration of health entails more than mere clinical ability and know-how: it needs to entail something within their interpersonal interaction (Laws & Chilton, 2012).

Conclusion

It may prove highly rewarding to healthcare providers to work with those belonging to a different cultural background. Fadiman explains how the Hmong community’s culture deepened her personal insights into family, empathy and assistance. Such valuable views may be missed if the emphasis is solely on delivery of biomedical solutions. Contemporary medicine provides tangible resolutions to ailments and, according to Kleinman, can treat “both disease and illness.” Practitioners’ attempts at providing such solutions to a culturally-diverse patient pool will succeed better if they learn to accept others’ views and cultivate within themselves the requisite skills for incorporating them into everyday clinical decision-making. Their personal lives will also be enriched through being open to perspectives which differ from their own (Brinkmann, 2018).