However, even though their paintings, carvings and sculptures probably served a more functional purpose than otherwise, this does not mean that they didn't want to add aesthetic value to those things. In the case of this funerary sculpture, however, there is very little aesthetic value added to it, which makes one think that its purpose was purely functional and that it served a very specific purpose.
Eros, on the other hand, made out of terracotta was most likely created for a different usage than that of Osiris. Muratov (2011) states that terracotta figurines in Ancient Greece were used in houses as decorations or they sometimes served as "cult images in small house shrines; some of them functioned as charms to ward off evil." Sometimes they were brought to temples and were given as offerings to the gods, but sometimes they were put on graves as "cherished possessions of the deceased, as gifts, or as protective devices" (Muratov). In this way, we can see that the uses for statues and statuettes in Ancient Egypt and Ancient Greece were very different and they held different meanings. It should be noted, however, that it is likely, according to Muratov (2011) that the terracotta figurine was painted and the paint could have simply faded away over time. If the terracotta figurine were to have been painted, then it could be surmised that the figurine was meant to serve a more aesthetic purpose (as decoration on a shelf or as a gift) as opposed to a functional purpose.
In thinking about these statues' meanings, we also have to consider that Osiris was a god that was worshipped and...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now