Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Democracy
According to Marc Plattner, in the beginning of the 20th century, most democratic countries were found in North America and, with some exceptions, Western Europe. Today, after much of the world has shed its colonialist past, democracy has appeared to be more widespread. Yet, with democracy comes a great responsibility for a fair form of government and a liberal state, which allows for many freedoms and various forms of opinion, or what we know here as inalienable rights. This paper will argue from Platter's point-of-view, and will agree that liberalism is essential to democracy and vice versa because one facet feeds of the other and must thus exist concomitantly. [1: Plattner, M.F. (1998). "Liberalism and Democracy: Can't Have One Without the Other." Foreign Affairs. Retrieved April 15, 2011, . ]
Plattner first states that liberal democracy means both democracy and liberalism. Democracy, according to the author, means rule for the people and...
Liberalism also includes natural rights or "human rights" that must be protected along with "plurality and diversity." This is the exact definition that makes up our own liberal democracy here in the United States. [2: Plattner, M.F. (1998). "Liberalism and Democracy: Can't Have One Without the Other." Foreign Affairs. Retrieved April 15, 2011, . ]
Plattner further states that "democracy and liberalism are […] linked" which, according to the writer, is "proven by the historical existence both of non-liberal democracies and of liberal non-democracies." Eventually, the author will state that neither of these systems are as effective in promoting human rights as liberal democracy, and will also prove that illiberal democracies (the term Zakaria utilizes) will eventually be more open to becoming liberal democracies. Plattner…
Though Plattner makes a good case for his thesis of the link between liberalism and democracy there are other political scientists, such as Fareed Zakaria, who believe that most democracies today are "illiberal," and thrive on this illiberality-according to Zakaria, "Illiberal democracy is a growing industry," which does not include freedoms such as we know in this country. This "growth" is due to the fact that these countries benefit from calling themselves so called democratic states, yet they offer none of the freedoms to suit this theory. However, what Zakaria fails to mention, according to Plattner, is that many of such democracies have, indeed, begun opening up to liberal ideals. As his last point, Plattner successfully proves his thesis by stating: [4: Zakaria, F. (1997). "The Rise of Illiberal Democracy." Foreign Affairs, 76(6) . Retrieved April 15, 2011, < http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~lebelp/FZakariaIlliberalDemocracy1997.pdf>.]
"It is precisely the illiberal democracies that Zakaria maligns that are likely to be the most receptive audience for the promotion of constitutional liberalism that he recommends."
This paper has thus argued in favor of the Platter thesis which concludes that liberalism and democracy are inextricably linked and that one feeds off the other and thus they eventually and inevitably must and will coexist. Plattner's discussion is thus important in view of the many nations in this world that must still open up to the ideas of liberalism.
Democracy / Liberty Is direct democracy desirable and/or possible today? Is direct democracy desirable and/or possible today? The question is addressed first theoretically, with reference to Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws, which actually categorizes direct democracy as one of the corruptions into which a democratic system can descend, by an insistence on too much egalitarianism. Direct democracy is considered as an ideal, which is desirable insofar as it offers a critique of
P). Regarding freedom of association, the same concerns itself with permitting people in a given society to collectively defend, pursue as well as express those interests they regard or consider common. This freedom by virtue of inclusion into various human rights instruments as well as constitutions is considered one of the basic freedoms. Sometimes used synonymously with freedom of assembly, freedom of expression could also entail the freedom to gather for
Democracy In some quarters, democracy has been regarded one of mankind's greatest institutional achievements. With that in mind, democracy as a concept has been subject to extensive research over time and in a way, these studies have helped us understand the very nature of democracy and democratization. In this text, I will briefly explore the British and the American constitution with an aim of finding out which of the two is
Democracy in Ancient Greece Class XXXX, Section XXXX, Fall, 2012 The term democracy was invented by ancient Greece, and it came about through the system of involving all the people in ruling of their land. The ancient Athenian Greeks have been credited with developing democratic rule. Though their governing system may not have been very democratic as present day democracies, it allowed participation of diverse social class of people. This paper will
Democracy in Tunisia Democratization is a process that involves a transition advocated by either people, or political leaders who eliminate authoritarian systems and created democratic systems of government. However, in most cases, the people initiated the change, which the political leaders had no, option, but join the people (Huntington 109). Owing to the many forms of democratic regimes, variations are inevitable. Some of the regimes include parliamentary and presidential regimes. Some
Democracy In a fair and free election, the resultant outcome comes from the majority ruling of votes. In an ideal democratic environment, such votes are the consequence of all participant voters -- the legitimate populace as allowed for such voting -- and thus officials are elected in service of the majority of the peoples. However, this utopic democracy is limited in that not all participant voters are knowledgeable in decisions affecting