Verified Document

Denver Smoking Ban Term Paper

¶ … policy proposal addressing the smoking ban in restaurants and bars in Denver. The arguments as well as suggestions will be presented in three main parts: Smoking has been one of the most controversial topics in Denver because the authorities of the government are in the opinion of banning smoking in restaurants and bars but they also need opinions and advices from the people living in Denver. Based on their suggestions and advices the authorities would take any action related to their idea of banning smoking especially in restaurants and bars.

This decision of the government authorities has been generated from the facts that the smokers have polluted the environments of restaurants and bars and the people who are non-smokers, ultimately suffers because of those who smoke in the bars and restaurants. These people have made complaints against the action of smokers and therefore, they have requested the authorities and the government to take some action regarding the torture which the non-smokers face due to the smoking habit of the people.

The main rationale behind the government's proposal is to provide protection against passive smoking in bars and restaurants. Tobacco smoke is seen as a particular threat to the health and well being of employees in such establishments, and it is also widely recognized that they enjoy relatively weak legal protection against such working environment hazards. Employees in bars and restaurant run a much greater risk of cancer-related illnesses than those in other occupations."...

It has also been noted that the employees working in the restaurants and bars are badly affected from the smoke which they inhale while they work. It is the responsibility of the government authorities to provide these employees with a safe and considerable working environment. And, the only solution to this problem is to ban smoking in such places.
There are many aspects of this problem and one of the aspects is that the rate of customers has been decreased because of the habit of smokers and thus the restaurants and ban owners suffer a lot. The customers are badly disturbed because of the smoke, which spreads in the environment, and they are not ready to bring their children to such restaurants where smoking is not banned. Hence, the revenue of the restaurants and bars is directly affected.

2) PROPOSAL FOR A SOLUTION:

The analysis and consideration of the problem states that an effective proposal for solution is needed so that the higher authorities of the state can visualize the proposal plan and can act accordingly. The solution is that the authorities should create a smoke free environment in order to remove all discomforts. The restaurants and bars owners should make surveys and researches and should include the opinions of their customers so that they can feel that…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

As retrieved from Smoking ban proposed to protect employees in bars and restaurants http://www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/2002/12/inbrief/no0212101n.html. On April 22,2004

As retrieved from The benefits to smoke free restaurants http://www.wish-wi.org/benefits_to_smoke_free_restaurants.htm. On April 22,2004
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Official Legal Definition of Contradiction
Words: 4563 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

This act enlarged the labels on the cigarettes, and required that the labels on cigarettes and cigarette ads say things like,."..Cause lung cancer...may complicate pregnancy...quitting smoking now greatly reduces hazards to your health... may result in low birth weight and fetal injury." Yet despite all these attempts to educate, all the package warnings and all the public service ads, we still see that despite the millions of dollars spent

British Cannabis Policy Reform
Words: 11793 Length: 37 Document Type: Essay

Cannabis in the UK: De-Penalisation, Decriminalisation, or Legalisation? In October of 2015, the Parliament of the United Kingdom was forced to debate whether the current prohibition on cannabis should end in some way. "Forced" is the correct word here, because Parliament seems otherwise unwilling to address the issue, but in this case it was obliged by its own policy, whereby any petition signed by at least one hundred thousand people must

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now