Descartes Rene Descartes, In His Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
976
Cite

However, there are numerous beliefs that his argument leaves unchallenged. When we dream, although the particular beliefs we form ("I am falling from an airplane.") are often false, the materials for our dream (airplanes, physical objects) come from things we experience when waking, and we can still rest assured that some of these things exist. Therefore, the dreaming argument leaves unchallenged our belief in general truths about the world (the belief that we have hands and what these hands do for us). One of the reasons Descartes believed his mind to be essentially non-physical is that he found himself able to doubt the existence of all physical objects (even his own hand) but could not doubt that he was a thinking being (Williams, 1998). Descartes also believed that, in contrast to the physical world, the mind was an indivisible unit.

Even Descartes realized that mind and body were unable to operate in isolation. If I put my hand into a fire, a physical change in temperature results in a mental change -- pain. I would then immediately think, "I need to move my hand away from the fire." This thought results in a physical change -- I move my hand from the fire. Descartes describes the body and mind as "intermingling" to create an apparent unit.

Descartes stressed that we all have the ability to doubt. Therefore, we have the power to doubt everything, including the entire world in which we...

...

However, he believed that the one thing we cannot doubt is our mind. He said that while we doubt, we must exist. "Cogito, ergo sum," Descartes said (Williams, 1998): I think, therefore I am. And the thinking thing is our mind.
Descartes then doubts the existence of God and the reliability of "clear and distinct ideas," and then our bodies (including our hands), and then the world around us (Williams, 1998). However, his argument has a major gap. He has concluded that there are two distinct substances: mind and body. Mind is comprised of thought, body by extension. Mind has no size or shape or location in space, and body is physical and exists purely in space and time. These things must interact with one another, though, as when I put my hand in a fire, my mind causes me to feel pain. So mental decisions can result in physical movement.

Descartes introduced us to a world of constant questioning. He taught us to question even the obvious, such as "is this my hand?" While I like the idea of doubting everything, I feel that I have enough evidence to believe that my hands exist.

Bibliography

The President and Fellows of Harvard College. (2002). Descartes' First Meditation. Retrieved from the Internet at http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu.

Williams, Bernard, "Rene Descartes," Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 2, pp. 344-354.

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

The President and Fellows of Harvard College. (2002). Descartes' First Meditation. Retrieved from the Internet at http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu.

Williams, Bernard, "Rene Descartes," Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 2, pp. 344-354.


Cite this Document:

"Descartes Rene Descartes In His" (2005, March 14) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/descartes-rene-descartes-in-his-63015

"Descartes Rene Descartes In His" 14 March 2005. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/descartes-rene-descartes-in-his-63015>

"Descartes Rene Descartes In His", 14 March 2005, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/descartes-rene-descartes-in-his-63015

Related Documents

DESCARTES' BELIEVE IN GOD Descartes Believe in God Descartes' Believe in God Science attempts to prove how God did or does things. The assessment is heavily disputed by archaic religious doctrines. The traditional conflict between science and religion is entirely based on the dominion and not what is right or wrong. Rene Descartes' belief in God is not based on atheistic principles, but on blasphemy as seen from the way he investigates God's

Descartes argues that the mind and the body must be two different things since he knows the mind exists but knows no such thing about the body. Spell out this argument. What's wrong with it, if anything? Give a counterexample to the principle implied here. Are other philosophers that we have read drawing conclusions about what the mind must be like based on what we know about the mind or how

Some of the reason for error, therefore, is not related to indifference or for not having enough time to fully consider some matter. Some of it is due to man's propensity to flaw, and to his limited ability (which is related to his limited mental and physical power). In addition to misinterpreting the nature of the relationship between intellect and free will, Descartes has incorrectly interpreted some of the most

Descartes and the Life of
PAGES 7 WORDS 2236

This is indeed an absolutely profound concept in that it can't help but support the idea of the autonomous individual, existing in connection to thought. The truth of these emotions, be them good or bad, speak to the authenticity of the self. There's a notion of realness -- of the self that is a facet of the genuine, as emotions and desires are founded upon the genuine. This notion

Descartes' Major Tenets Descartes Major Tenets Descartes was one of the most well-respected thinkers of his time, and he applied his special brand of logic to a wide-variety of disciplines, most notably mathematics and philosophy. The Cartesian approach to philosophy, like many approaches to philosophy, looked at the interaction of the mind and the brain. Were the mind and the brain one united organism, did they interact with one another, was one

If at the moment of stating this theory, animals were simply regarded as mindless creatures, their current status has changed. A large number of organizations received state funds to investigate the lives of animals and came up with astonishing results. The researches developed concluded that most animals had a very active brain and could reach high level of intelligence and communication skills. As such, even if a large part