Dial-Up Vs. Wireless: A Business Term Paper

Excerpt from Term Paper :

These costs can difficult to calculate, as they depend upon the ability of the employees. But one must remember the breadth of experience of new workers in the workplace with wireless. It was concluded that these worker could act as continual helpers in the on-site transition without substantial additional costs to the company.

A second important consideration was the ubiquity of the new wireless technology, and its lack of likelihood of being replaced in the near future by an even superior form of connectivity technology. It is not enough that a technology seem better than preexisting forms, but that the technology has compatibility with preexisting systems, such as dialups, and is also unlikely to be replaced in the near future, and thus requires yet another jarring workplace transition. As research pointed out that wireless was both compatible with other businesses still using dialups, unlikely to be replaced by better forms of accessing the Internet, and was teachable to the current staff, the decision to switch to wireless seemed to be a clear.

Cite This Term Paper:

"Dial-Up Vs Wireless A Business" (2005, July 20) Retrieved April 19, 2019, from

"Dial-Up Vs Wireless A Business" 20 July 2005. Web.19 April. 2019. <

"Dial-Up Vs Wireless A Business", 20 July 2005, Accessed.19 April. 2019,