Discrepancies In Katherine Watkin's Case Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1038
Cite
Related Topics:

Katherine Watkin's Case Of 1681 The following study presents arguments showing the discrepancies from the Katherine Watkin's case. It is apparent that the people she relied on to support her case did not testify. Katherine's statement indicated that an examination on her situation as the wife of Henrico County's Henry Watkins, in Virginia was recorded on 13 September 1681 and was witnessed by John Farrar and William Byrd. The two worked as Majesty Justices at the County. This study appreciates the depositions by Katherine herself as the victim, John Aus, William Harding, Mary Winter, Humprey Smith and Lambert Tye.

While giving the deposition under oath, Katherine pointed out that she went meet John Long on Friday the Month of August (around five weeks from the time). John Long was a Mulatto under Capt. Thomas Cocke stationed near piney slash and between Henry Watkins and Cockes house. It was alleged that he threw Katherine from behind a tree. This was on the same time and place that he covered her Mouth using a handkerchief while taking up Katherine's petticoats. He probably ravished her dignity although Katherine managed to cry out for help. Later, Jack White rescued her. She went home while John went towards his Masters' house after the abuse. Katherine observed that her husband was inclined to the Quakers and could not prosecute. Since she was sick, and her children were unwell. She could not launch complaints before going to Lt. Col. Farrars. The following morning, she went to William Randolph's...

...

However, she later met with Justices at the house of Cocke in Virginia before making the complaint on oath (Document 3-4-52).
However, controversial testimonies were considered in the decision making process. In one of the depositions by John Aust, he went to see Mr. Cocke on the fateful Friday. Some of his Cocke's servants were in the orchard cutting down some weeds. Cocke asked him to stay so that they could hang out together for a drink. While inside, John Aust mentions that Jacke offered to fetch the drinks for him from the inside but stayed unusually longer. When he followed inside, he heard Henry Watkins' wife Katherine asking Jacke why he did not make any efforts of visting their house like her children do. He mentions that Katherine drew him closer and kissed him. After this, Jack left to fetch the drink but Katherine protested. He went to join the company of Cockes who were sharing the drinks together. He shows that Katherine pestered Negro dirke by the shirt by asking if he had a 'long thing'. As she left for the outside, Katherine met Jacke and as they drew each other closer, she touched his 'codpiece.' The fondling continued in the garden and the bed in the fishroom. John Aust extends the controversy by saying that de did know what went on after this (Document 3-4-53).

The William Harding's deposition brought up interesting and controversial facts about the case. He mentioned in his deposition mentioned that he went to Mr. Thomas Cocke's house…

Sources Used in Documents:

Work cited

Document 3-4. Sex and Race relations: Testimony from Virginia Court Records, 1681. In Reading the American Past. Pp 51-54


Cite this Document:

"Discrepancies In Katherine Watkin's Case" (2015, February 05) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/discrepancies-in-katherine-watkin-case-2149104

"Discrepancies In Katherine Watkin's Case" 05 February 2015. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/discrepancies-in-katherine-watkin-case-2149104>

"Discrepancies In Katherine Watkin's Case", 05 February 2015, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/discrepancies-in-katherine-watkin-case-2149104

Related Documents

Drink Probability Experiment Preface to Study You plan to conduct a marketing experiment in which students are to taste one of two different brands of soft drink. Their task is to identify the brand tasted. You select a random sample of 200 students and assume that the students have no ability to distinguish between the two brands. (Hint: if an individual has no ability to distinguish between the two soft drinks, then each

The Living Essentials company claims it markets its high-powered beverage (which is sold in a 2-oz bottle as a "shot") to "…hardworking adults who need an extra boost of energy" (Meier, p. 2). Another article in the respected New York Times reports that in addition to the 13 fatalities linked to 5-Hour Energy, another 5 deaths have been linked to "Monster Energy" (Meier, 2012). These data were released by the

Sport Drink Facts and Fictions Sports Drinks Commercial sports drinks make many claims, such as giving athletes 'wings' (Red Bull GmbH, n.d.), "Seizing Every Advantage" (PepsiCo, 2013), or "Go Stronger for Longer" (Coca Cola Co., 2013). Red Bull's Energy Drink contains 320 mg of caffeine and 110g (11%) of sucrose and glucose per liter (Red Bull GmbH, n.d.). Gatorade Thirst Quencher contains 58.3 g (5.8%) of sucrose and dextrose per liter of

Marketing Sports Drink In today's current marketplace, there is stiff competition among sports drink manufacturers. Our company has developed a product with an edge on the competition. The product is a sports drink that comes in a container that effectively keeps the drink cold for approximately six hours. In order for sales of this product to succeed in the marketplace, it is necessary for our company to devise effective strategies for

A low concentration of market share is always held by many rival firms making the competitive landscape more intense. Threat of substitutes; Substitutes refer to other products in other industries. Pepsi deals with beverage industry and food industry for example. The private label food products that are low priced compared to those of Pepsi which is highly priced, is leading to price wars as customers opt for cheaper products. Buyer power;

Sports and Energy Drinks
PAGES 3 WORDS 991

Energy Drink The strategic group map for the energy/sports drink category should focus along the axes of energy and sport. An energy drink is basically a caffeine/sugar bomb, intended to provide a burst of energy and alertness. A sports drink tends to also have a lot of sugar, but not necessarily caffeine, and instead will have salt as a means of boosting electrolytes. Thus, the two categories can be quite a