Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Ethical Dilemma
Group A: The situation with the journalist reflects on the ethical implications of a contract. A contract is an agreement, and is legally binding. Under law, there are provisions for how and when a contract may be broken -- a more lucrative offer from a competitor is unlikely to be among these. Morally, a contract is an obligation that should be upheld. But that is, ultimately a rather weak morality in that in the grand scope of right vs. wrong, breaking a contract is relatively irrelevant. Even the aggrieved party will recover just fine; nobody got hurt, nobody got killed; nobody's rights were trampled.
But ethically, this situation is more interesting. This is business, and there are not a lot of ethics in business. The legal wrangling about the contract is an accepted tactic in business -- you use the system to your advantage when you can, and that is what both parties are trying to do here. Only one will actually win, and it is possible that such a victory might be Pyrrhic.
Ultimately, the lack of genuine harm here calls into question whether this is a legitimate ethical dilemma. A contract does create obligation, but contracts are...
There are plenty of scenarios where the first newspaper would have to consider breaking contract with the columnist to fire her. It would be surprising if a threat to break contract was a negotiating ploy gone awry. Ultimately, the point of the legal system is to provide a venue for the resolution of such grievances. There is no major moral issue here because contracts are never really fixed, and employment is at will. Ethically, it is a suspect move on the part of the journalist, but someone putting their own interests ahead of those of their employer is not exactly a major ethical violation, given that the inverse happens all the time.
The question should be asked -- would Augustine even care about a contract dispute? God has more important things to worry about than contract grievances. This is not a scenario where evil is involved, so really is outside the realm of Augustinian ethical perspective. Aquinas was concerned with principles, and in that breaking a contract for self-gain is likely against his principles. Either man could interpret the action as one of greed, and thus a violation of natural law, but the newspaper is acting in its own…
References
Matthews, G. (2002). Augustine (AD 354-430). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 13, 2015 from http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/Cavalier/80130/part1/sect3/texts/R_Augustine.html
DeYoung, R., McCluskey, C. & Van Dyke, C. (2009). Aquinas' ethics. University of Notre Dame Press. Retrieved March 13, 2015 from http://www3.nd.edu/~undpress/excerpts/P01296-ex.pdf
Augustine is a Christian father of the late Roman Empire -- the traditional date of the "fall" of the Roman Empire is about a half-century after Augustine's death -- while Thomas Aquinas is a thinker of the medieval period. It is worth noting this substantially large time difference -- eight hundred years separates Augustine from Aquinas, just as another eight hundred years separate Aquinas from ourselves -- because we need
Augustine and Aquinas Saint Augustine and Aquinas are both very well-known because of their theological and philosophical explorations, with Augustine writing in late fourth to the early fifth century while Aquinas in the thirteenth century. They are both well-known for their efforts of trying to reconcile ancient philosophy and Christianity however they did these using different ways. Augustine took Platonic route while Aquinas was more focused on the Arstotelian way.
Personal Ethics Theory For me, the concept of utilitarianism is the most compelling ethical philosophy. When we think about society, we think about what is best for the many, and/or does the means to the end matter more than the end results. This is the basic premise of utilitarianism and the offshoot, deontology. Using utilitarianism, the most ethical thing anyone, individual or society, can do is an action that, when completed,
On Why Evolution is TrueIntroductionDarwin catapulted the theory of evolution to the main stage with his Origin of Species. In Why Evolution is True, Coyne (2009) takes a look at the theory of evolution and breaks it down from various perspectives to show why it has more explanatory power than the theory of Creationism. This review identifies the themes in Coyne�s (2009) book, discusses my own personal journey of discovery,
The main idea that one can understand from this story is that happiness can be concluded referring to an individual only when his life has been completed. This is because at that point, one will have the necessary facts to be able to arrive to such a conclusion. This means that happiness is a final objective in itself, a quest by individuals who try to be happy all the way
Medieval Political Thought How did Augustine of Hippo's and Thomas Aquinas' views of the role of human free will in the process of salvation shape their different views of political theory? For Augustine, there could be two cities -- the City of Man, which would essentially be a society without grace or goodness -- and the City of God, which would be a society that conformed to the will of God, participated