Farming The Home Place -- Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
1028
Cite
Related Topics:

The Cortez Growers Association (CGA) provided some community structure and cohesion to the life of the farmers. Membership in the organization was contingent upon board approval and the payment of fifty dollars. From its origins, it evolved into a diversified structure, encompassing the marketing of produce, the shipping of goods, the purchase of farm supplies on a collective basis, even the drying of fruit. (Matsumoto, p.49; 53) However, far beyond a purely business related collective of farmers, the CGA created an important cultural institution. It staged traditional Noh plays for the community and provided English language and Sunday school instruction, although some members of the community retained their devout Buddhism, despite the efforts of Christian missionaries. The CGA showed how these farmers could retain their Japanese culture and still function as loyal Americans Ironically, the passage of the 1924 Immigration Act that limited the number of Japanese immigrants reduced some of the hostility to the members of the community for a time. But after the outbreak of World War II, much of this changed. The FBI questioned and seized the holdings of Issei leaders based upon their racial identity alone. (Matsumoto, p. 91) Many Japanese farmers, as a result of their displacement, lost their leases to their farms. The CGA cushioned some of the blows that internment provided to this still-fragile, but once-flourishing community. It arranged for the supervision of the land while the Japanese-Americans were away. The CGA and the knowledge that the lives they had worked so hard to build were not completely...

...

Still, the conditions of the camps forced ordinary, innocent people to live criminals -- toiling at enforced agricultural projects, eating at a canteen -- there was even a barber shop, again, much like a prison. (Matsumoto, pp.121-11) After the war, the tension and cultural divide that had been created between Japanese-Americans and their non-Japanese neighbors was not so easy to heal.
In her analysis of Japanese farm life pre, during, and post internment, Valerie Matsumoto does not idealize Japanese culture. She notes in particular, even before life in an internment camp: "The work of Japanese women stretched from dawn to dusk. In addition to fieldwork, they scrubbed laundry on washboards, cooked meals on wooden stoves and over outside fires, washed dishes, and heated water," for the Japanese baths, as well as tended the children. (Matsumoto, p.47) However, Matsumoto's book Farming the Home Place also reveals the importance of community life and structure and above all the ties to one another and to the land, a legacy of these early years that was often forgotten. For these farmers, land, and working the land meant home, and leaving this land meant leaving everything -- work, family, livelihood, and a new, fragile identity as Americans who still loved their home culture, but were loyal to their new, home country.

Works Cited

Matsumoto, Valerie. (1994). Farming the Home Place. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Matsumoto, Valerie. (1994). Farming the Home Place. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.


Cite this Document:

"Farming The Home Place --" (2006, December 12) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/farming-the-home-place-40985

"Farming The Home Place --" 12 December 2006. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/farming-the-home-place-40985>

"Farming The Home Place --", 12 December 2006, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/farming-the-home-place-40985

Related Documents

Yet, these were small amenities that did not mask the horrible conditions of the camps very well. Most of those within the camps were American citizens, and should not have had their liberties taken away with such blatant disregard for upholding American principles of freedom. Many Japanese-Americans, who were born in the U.S., paid taxes, and even bought war bonds, were treated like criminals during the relocation, "The Japanese-Americans suffered

Japanese internment camps are a dark period of American history. The forced incarceration of Americans of Japanese descent was based solely on racism and a culture of fear. During World War II, Americans also counted Italians and Japanese as their archrivals but of these groups, it was only Japanese-Americans that were rounded up and placed into concentration camps. Just as African-American soldiers could not serve alongside their white counterparts,

The provision that persons cannot be deprived of liberty without due process of law takes precedence over the war powers." Both authors therefore agree that the American Constitution prohibits the unwarranted detention of citizens based on their ethnicity alone. Only the Chicago Daily Tribune article uses the type of language befitting an editorial. For instance, the author uses terms like "prejudice" and "hysteria" to describe the issue. The Los Angeles

internment camps for the Japanese that were set up and implemented by president Franklin D. Roosevelt. The writer explores the history leading up to the decision and the decision itself. There were six sources used to complete this paper. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor the American public was outraged and stunned. American citizens had lived with a false sense of security for many years that the soil of the United

Japanese-Americans in the West Coast lived peacefully before President Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 in February 1942 that condemned them to misery in internment camps in the deserts of California. Those who owned property had to sell them. Some had to give up their belongings. The Japanese-Americans could not wage any form of resistance because this would be suppressed by brute military force. Nobody would be foolhardy enough to

Internment of Japanese-Americans in World War II When the national interests are threatened, history has shown that American presidents will take extraordinary measures to protect them, even if this means violating the U.S. Constitution. For example, the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act enacted immediately following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, watered down civil liberties for American citizens. Likewise, President Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War