Verified Document

Federal Court Essay

Snyder v. Phelps The First Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, and prohibits the making of any law " impeding the free exercise of religion," infringing on the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances." Originally, the First Amendment only applied to the Congress. However, in the 20th century, the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies the First Amendment to each state, including any local government (Farber, 2002, intro). The First Amendment has been used over and over again to test the limits of free speech or exercising opinions that may be contrary to current public views, or even offensive to some.

This was the case in a 2011 Supreme Court Decision, Snyder v. Phelps (562 U.S. Supreme Court), in which the Court found that speech on public sidewalks about a contentious or public issue is covered under the First Amendment right to free and uncontested speech, even if that speech is distasteful, or as the Court noted, "outrageous."

The issue surrounded the claim of intentional emotional distress. On March 10, 2006, members...

Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, killed in a non-combat accident in Iraq. The WBC members had picketed other funerals, and were trying to use this forum to express their indignation about America's increasing tolerance of homosexuality and liberal views. Picketers held posters that said such things as "Fag Troops," "God Hates You," "Semper Fi Fags," and "Thank God for Dead Soldiers," among others (Bates, 2011).
Albert Snyder, Matthew's Father, was so distressed by this behavior that he sued Fred Phelps, Pastor of the WBC, and two of his daughters for defamation, intrusion, intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy. The claim of defamation was dismissed because it focused on comments on the WBC website, which the courts held that the contentions were opinion meant for a limited audience. The actual facts of the case were not disputed at trial, but the WBC countered that they had complied with all local ordinances and police instructions. Although WBC sought a mistrial, in October 2007, the jury found for Snyder with a total award of $10.9 million, later reduced to $5 million by a Judge based on the resources of the WBC. The Fourth…

Sources used in this document:
REFERENCES

Snyder v. Phelps. U.S. Supreme Court 562, Docket 09-751. March 2, 2011.

Bates, T. One Family's Fight Against the Westboro Baptist Church. AOL News. (March

2, 2011). Retrieved from: http://www.aolnews.com/2011/03/02/snyder-familys-fight-against-the-westboro-baptist-church/

Farber, D. The First Amendment -- Concepts & Insights. Washington, DC: Foundation
2010). Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/07 / us/07scotus.html?scp=1&sq=marine&st=nyt&_r=0
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now