Galileo: On Reasoning "In Question Of Science, Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
573
Cite

Galileo: On Reasoning "In question of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual" (GALILEO).

Galileo was a noted mathematician, astronomer, physicist, and philosopher (Drake 1995), who many regard as the "father of modern science" (Redondi 1987). In his lifetime, Galileo was a somewhat controversial figure; falling out of favor with pope Urban VIII and the Jesuits for his work, "Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems" (Hawking 2009). He was one of the first to establish that mathematics and nature were interrelated; ignoring authorities and traditional thought regarding the separation of philosophy and science and religion.

With regard to the aforementioned quote, Galileo reaffirmed his oppositional and frequently controversial positioning with respect to those in authority. He was not a man prone to following conventional tides, untested and unregulated. The implications...

...

Authority and their opinions, philosophies, ideologies and reasoning's are to be and should be challenged by individuals who may sit outside of respected and notable circles.
Galileo's position stands in stark opposition to the methods and methodologies of modern day science. It is only with proof valid of others testing and proving hypothesis and theories that ideas and opinions come to be regarded as such. What Galileo posited and what most modern day scientists seem to disregard is the fact that someone had to have an original thought for others to test. Moreover, posited thought is only deemed worthy after it has been tested and either proven or disproven.

What frequently occurs in contemporary scientific arenas…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Drake, S. Galileo at work: His scientific biography. Chicago, IL: Dover, 1995.

Hawking Stephen. Galileo and the birth of modern science. American Heritage's Invention & Technology, 24(1), 36.

Redondi, P. Galileo heretic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.


Cite this Document:

"Galileo On Reasoning In Question Of Science " (2011, October 28) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/galileo-on-reasoning-in-question-of-science-52634

"Galileo On Reasoning In Question Of Science " 28 October 2011. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/galileo-on-reasoning-in-question-of-science-52634>

"Galileo On Reasoning In Question Of Science ", 28 October 2011, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/galileo-on-reasoning-in-question-of-science-52634

Related Documents
Galileo Was Certainly One of
PAGES 12 WORDS 3484

Indeed, we can see here his own initial wonderment and the very simple excitement that he felt upon making a series of discoveries that, aside from being exciting, were clearly of exceptional and lasting scientific significance and would certainly earn Galileo a reputation as one of the most important astronomical observers of his time if not in all of history. However, we can also see how this initial awe

Galileo Product Idea Description Most technical innovations in any field have been combinations or amalgams of software and hardware applications that were never meant to be used together. However, they have nevertheless come into existence because someone decided to marry up these unimagined elements in combination with each other. To midwife these projects to full fruition, startup money is needed. As usual, the military is the usual maternity ward for such applications and

Technology and Society
PAGES 4 WORDS 1396

Science and religion have historically possessed a tumultuous relationship based upon the fact that the latter claims to hold the ultimate answers to the most fundamental questions of existence, while the former claims to hold the means to discovering many of these answers. Consequently, for much of human history they have been viewed as being analogous avenues to gaining knowledge of the world, merely attacked from different directions; science must

82) because he had to find a bridge from the old paradigm to the new one. He argued that science could restore man to the dominion he enjoyed before the "Fall" (caused by ignorance). Some scholars argue that Bacon never saw any environmental change as undesirable and viewed all science as good. Rene Descartes also profoundly influenced the modern idea of nature. He argued that mind and matter are distinct

Nature of Science Even in
PAGES 2 WORDS 595

Smith notes that it may be impossible to unequivocally prove something with one hundred percent accuracy; rather, scientists seek probability. The term theory is often misconstrued: Smith states that "theories always explain facts." Moreover, there is no clear demarcation between a theory and a hypothesis. Theories are basically broad hypotheses. Laws, on the other hand, are more restrictive and are often derived from theories. The practice of science entails experimentation

Anti-science is nothing new and in fact has been seamlessly woven into the story of human progress. Locating historical incidents linked to the repercussions of anti-intellectualism or anti-science is easy. One of the first European examples of the repercussions of anti-intellectualism is the story of Socrates's death sentence due to his philosophy of reason contradicting the established religious authorities in ancient Athens. Anti-intellectualism permeates European history, culminating with the excommunication