Government Regulations Or Antitrust Activities Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
733
Cite

¶ … government's anti-trust regulations in the case of PeaceHealth, a non-profit health system that operates several hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. PeaceHealth, based in Bellevue, has steadily acquired several rural hospitals in Washington, Oregon and Alaska. Because of its broad network, PeaceHealth has become the object of government anti-trust legislation. In 2002, the Oregon-based McKenzie-Willamette Hospital filed an anti-trust lawsuit against PeaceHealth. McKenzie-Willamette claimed that Peacehealth gave regional insurers deep discounts and different rates for the same services. This practice involved healthcare insurance companies like Providence Health Care Plan and Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield. According to the McKenzie-Willamette, Peacehealth cut its rates for Regence, in return for the removal of McKenzie-Willamette from Regence's preferred provider list. Similarly, Peacehealth's discounted rates for HMO services resulted in the removal of McKenzie-Willamette from Providence's list of preferred healthcare providers (Harwood 2004).

In the anti-trust lawsuit, McKenzie-Willamette charged that its patient visits declined as a result of PeaceHealth's actions. Additionally, McKenzie-Willamette produced documents showing that PeaceHealth threatened to raise Blue Cross Blue Shield's PPP rate by 14%, if McKenzie-Willamette was admitted to the...

...

Furthermore, PeaceHealth was charged with unfair pricing practices, since the PeaceHealth-owned Sacred Heart Hospital provided tertiary and neonatal services to Regence policy holders at below-market rates. Practices such as these paved the way for PeaceHealth to steadily build a monopoly in the Pacific Northwest region.
The case was brought to trial in October 2003, and by October 31, a Portland-based jury found PeaceHealth guilty of anti-competitive price discrimination. The jury agreed that PeaceHealth's actions constituted anti-competitive price discrimination, interfering with McKenzie-Willamette's business. The jury further found that PeaceHealth was attempting to monopolize the local healthcare market. PeaceHealth was ordered to pay a total of $25.4 million in compensatory and punitive damages (Harwood 2004).

Most high-profile anti-trust cases are now filed in relation to information technology. The PeaceHealth case, however, presents a throwback to original anti-trust cases such as the case filed against Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company. In fact, the PeaceHealth case bears many striking resemblances to the way Standard Oil was judged to be in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Like the Standard Oil case, PeaceHealth maintained that its discount practices constituted legitimate business…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Harwood, Joe. 2004. "Washington-based PeaceHealth denied new antitrust trial." The Register Guard. October 2.


Cite this Document:

"Government Regulations Or Antitrust Activities" (2004, October 12) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/government-regulations-or-antitrust-activities-56628

"Government Regulations Or Antitrust Activities" 12 October 2004. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/government-regulations-or-antitrust-activities-56628>

"Government Regulations Or Antitrust Activities", 12 October 2004, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/government-regulations-or-antitrust-activities-56628

Related Documents

AP Wire. (8 Mar 2005) "Anti - Monopoly Agency Rules Against Intel. The New York Times. Business News. Retrieved 8 Mar 2005 at http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Japan-Intel.html One of the central concerns regarding government regulation of businesses and the establishment of monopolies is to protect the consumer by creating an open sphere of market competition. But what of a marketplace where a non-sanctioned monopoly has ensued where the consumer is not being unduly harmed?

Antitrust Case Background One recent antitrust action has been between the United States Justice Department and the credit card companies. The government has argued that American Express has hindered competition in the credit card market. At issue are rules that AMEX imposes on retailers to prevent them from offering incentives to customers to use other cards (Longstreth, 2014). This is not the first time that credit card companies have faced antitrust action,

In short, the petitioners accused Microsoft of monopolizing the market by way of unfair practices. In 2000, the court found Microsoft guilty of such violations of antitrust laws. As a consequence, Microsoft was broken into two businesses. What's more, other businesses filed grievances against Microsoft; the latter oftentimes settled out of court, paying restitution to the claimants. Shortly after the judgment to breakup Microsoft was made, it was partly

Antitrust and Intellectual Property Antitrust Law Remedies in Intellectual Property Cases In any research paper it is important to first define the terms used prominently in order to make sure that the reader understands what is being said. In this case, the two terms that require definition are antitrust and intellectual property. According to a definition from Cornell University Law School "Trusts and monopolies are concentrations of economic power in the hands

Antitrust Failure of the Firm to Increase Market Power through the Merger Merging refers to a corporate combination of two or more independent companies into one enterprise. A merge can take various forms such as a dominant firm purchasing the shares of another or a mutual agreement by two rival firms to cut unhealthy competition between them. The forms of mergers between companies can be horizontal, vertical or market extensional. The form

Antitrust Law
PAGES 4 WORDS 1187

Antitrust laws are laws that were enacted to guarantee American consumers the right to expect the benefits of free and open competition. Such laws are enforced by the United States Department of Justice's antitrust division (Anonymous, 2010). There are numerous Acts that constitute the Antitrust Laws. These include the Sherman Act, Clayton Act, and the Robinson-Patman. Sherman Act, the primary federal antitrust provision, seeks to promote and protect competition by