Governmental Services Privatized Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
758
Cite

Privatization of Governmental Services Privatization of government services

There has been a growing trend towards the privatization of governmental services in the world today. Privatization of government services refers to the handing over of public functions to companies that are privately owned. This paper will examine some of the benefits and detriments of privatization. I will give my position on the topic and give reasons why I take this position.

Benefits of privatization

The privatization of government services is beneficial in various ways. The government is not capable of providing all services to all its citizens. This is because the government might lack some expertise that is necessary to perform different functions. Most of the private companies have all the relevant expertise required to effectively provide various services to the public. This means privatization of government services will provide an opportunity to private companies to use their resources and tools in order to effectively provide services to the public. These are particularly services that the government can not provide due to the required expertise (Nichols, 2010).

Private companies are also quite productive...

...

Through privatization, the government makes savings on the services they could be offering to the public but are now offered by private companies. Private companies have a profit incentive and hence they work towards cutting costs and becoming more efficient. The main interest of private companies is profit generation. Therefore they strive hard to cut down their costs as much as possible. Due to privatization, many companies such as British Airways have been able to improve on their efficiency and increased their profitability. Privatization will lead to a reduction of the size of the government. This is because the government would no longer require many people to work for them since they have privatized the services they were offering. The government does not have resources in place to deal with the emerging and changing needs. The private sector on the other hand is up-to-date hen it comes to technology required to satisfy the changing and emerging needs. With privatization, the private companies are able to cope with these changes in the needs of the public. Privatization also mans that there will not be nay political interference when it comes to service delivery. The privatization…

Sources Used in Documents:

Cite this Document:

"Governmental Services Privatized" (2014, September 25) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/governmental-services-privatized-192079

"Governmental Services Privatized" 25 September 2014. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/governmental-services-privatized-192079>

"Governmental Services Privatized", 25 September 2014, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/governmental-services-privatized-192079

Related Documents

Despite these constraints, China does in fact have an impressive transportation infrastructure already, and China's rankings relative to the rest of the world in various transportation infrastructure categories is provided in Table 1 below. Table 1 Current Status of China's Transportation Infrastructure Infrastructure Category Statistics/Current Status World Rank Airports 15 Railways 77,834 km 3 Roadways 3,583,715 km (includes 53,913 km of expressways) 2 Waterways 110,000 km navigable 1 Merchant marine 1,826 3 Ports and terminals Dalian, Guangzhou, Ningbo, Qingdao, Qinhuangdao, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Tianjin (see map at Appendix a) Source: China, 2010 The

Privatization is the use of the private sector in government management and delivery of public services. Contracting out services predates the Constitution. In fact, in the early nineteenth century, some "inherently" governmental functions such as tax collection, mail delivery, and spying were performed by private contractors. Throughout the twentieth century, the government has continued to rely on contractors. The Clinton administration, under the 1998 Federal Activities Reform Act, required federal agencies

This gave the immediate need to contract the prison facilities. Literature review Extant literature has been dedicated to the topic of privatization of the rather publicly run correctional facilities in America. These literatures have been mixed and contain mixed views of proponent for privatization and its opponents alike. The literatures therefore have expressed favors of the system as well as critical of it. There also exists another category expressing pure criticism.

S. General Accounting Office (GAO) estimates' in 1991 stated that nearly 30% of those incarcerated had used drugs daily in the month before committing the offense for which they were in prison. By the year 2003 there were approximately 6.9 million individuals either on probation, in mail, or in prison which equals 32% of all U.S. adults residents or 1 out of every 32 adults. (U.S. Bureau of Justice Corrections

privatization of Air Traffic Control in the U.S. Non-profit privatization of ATC Industry experts position on privatizing the U.S. ATC Improvement in safety and regulation New Public Management Orientation in the U.S. Air Traffic Control Technology up gradation and budgetary constraints State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are organizations owned and operated by governments. There is a growing consensus amongst economists and governments that governments should not operate commercial organizations as it hampers the efficiency and productivity of the

To avoid repeating negative historical experiences, regulatory regimes need to block the control and domination by networks/platforms. In the report, "Infrastructure and Development: A Critical Appraisal of the Macro Level Literature," Stephane Straub (2007) reported that at times, in some developing companies, "the hope of getting a fixed-line installed is a distant and costly dream" (p. 4). Meantime, the primary option for the individuals waiting for fixed-line telecommunications services