¶ … Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, and the film "The Grapes of Wrath," directed by John Huston. Specifically, it will compare and contrast the differences between the movie and the book and speculate as to why the directors/screenwriters would have altered the original work in the way that they did, and explore the concept of family in the film.
The Grapes of Wrath" is an American classic, both in film and in literature. Remarkably, the film follows the book quite closely; the biggest difference in the film is Huston's ending, which is far more upbeat and positive than Steinbeck's, which ends with Rosasharn's baby dying, a flooding rain, and finally Rosasharn nursing a starving man in the boxcar where they have taken shelter from the storm. In addition, the final speech in the film actually appeared in Chapter 20 of the novel, and Ma did not say it to Pa, she said it to Tom. Directors and screenwriters use liberties such as these because they have a different vision of the finished work, or they want to add their own beliefs to the work, even though they were attempting to be true to Steinbeck's novel. The ending of the film is far more upbeat than the novel, and perhaps the director felt the film would be too depressing, and audiences would not attend.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.