Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
327). In short, the system 'worked' at this time for patients, hospitals, insurance companies, and the government.
Blue Cross plans also benefited from special state-level legislation that allowed them to act as nonprofit corporations, to enjoy tax-exempt status, and to be free from the usual insurance regulations. Physicians, although they initially opposed all forms of health insurance, created Blue Shield in deference to the demand for Blue Cross insurance, and in fear of more government regulation if some costs were not borne by the industry (Thomasson, 2002, p. 237-338). World War II wage and price controls also meant that one of the primary incentives employers had to attract scarce reserves of high-quality employee was offering benefits, including health insurance (Thomasson, 2002, p. 240).
Supply and demand of services and labor thus both conspired as corollary historical forces to increase the prevalence of private insurance in the American model. The improved quality and supply of healthcare drove up demand and prices, which caused individuals to seek healthcare insurance. Physicians, in response to employer-created insurance, began to provide their own plans....
Were there not also potential savings for consumers and hospitals, based upon volume 'sales' of insurance-bearing patients to in-network providers? Without some comparison of conditions abroad in nations that did adopt government models, or more heavily subsidized forms of care, although Thomasson's explanation is persuasive and lucid in isolation, it is hard not to wonder if cultural resistance to government intervention in the U.S. might not play a role. Yet government intervention was more welcome in the 1930s than in the 1990s, when single-payer insurance was rejected by the U.S. government. The explanations for the resistance to widespread government support for healthcare in the U.S. during the Great Depression and World War II still does not have an entirely satisfactory…
Blue Cross plans also benefited from special state-level legislation that allowed them to act as nonprofit corporations, to enjoy tax-exempt status, and to be free from the usual insurance regulations. Physicians, although they initially opposed all forms of health insurance, created Blue Shield in deference to the demand for Blue Cross insurance, and in fear of more government regulation if some costs were not borne by the industry (Thomasson, 2002, p. 237-338). World War II wage and price controls also meant that one of the primary incentives employers had to attract scarce reserves of high-quality employee was offering benefits, including health insurance (Thomasson, 2002, p. 240).
Supply and demand of services and labor thus both conspired as corollary historical forces to increase the prevalence of private insurance in the American model. The improved quality and supply of healthcare drove up demand and prices, which caused individuals to seek healthcare insurance. Physicians, in response to employer-created insurance, began to provide their own plans. Insurance plans made it favorable for hospitals to increase their supply of patients, and employers could attract scarce labor by offering insurance.
However, there is one problem with Thomasson's article -- were these innovations not present in at least some European countries, which also presumably experienced improved medical care, scarce labor during the war, and similar increases in costs of care. Were there not also potential savings for consumers and hospitals, based upon volume 'sales' of insurance-bearing patients to in-network providers? Without some comparison of conditions abroad in nations that did adopt government models, or more heavily subsidized forms of care, although Thomasson's explanation is persuasive and lucid in isolation, it is hard not to wonder if cultural resistance to government intervention in the U.S. might not play a role. Yet government intervention was more welcome in the 1930s than in the 1990s, when single-payer insurance was rejected by the U.S. government. The explanations for the resistance to widespread government support for healthcare in the U.S. during the Great Depression and World War II still does not have an entirely satisfactory explanation.
Health History This health history involves the health needs and characteristics of a 23-year-old Caucasian male. Reason for Care The reason this patient is seeking care is multi-fold. He bears all the signs of an intravenous drug user and has an infection in his arm, clearly from injecting substances into his body with unclean needles or in unsanitary manners. The patient demonstrates an extreme shortness of breath, dry mouth, constricted pupils and
Health History Examination FUNDAMENTAL IN ADULT CARE Individual Client Health History Examination of an Older Adult Client/Patient Initials LNP Sex: F. Age Occupation: free-lance researcher- journalist Health History/Review of Systems Neurological System -- the patient seldom suffers headaches or dizziness. She has no difficulty speaking or swallowing. She only takes vitamin and mineral supplements on a daily basis. She sits long hours before a computer because of her work, however. And thus experiences numbness in the
Health History Health Condition: On Set: Patient, Diana Cates, age 47, has been suffering from Thyroidectomy. The patient cannot tolerate synthoid as it aggrevates and the central tremors even at lowest dose. Currently he has enlarged right thyroid. How long: thyroid, Pt., thyroidectomy since 1993 Causes and Effects of Health Condition: Provocative/pallative: Precipitating factors: Quality of Health Condition: It's located in the thyroid and it does not spread. Long-Term Care: The thyroid problem affects her walking due to her
nursing . I requesting NURSING KNOWLEDGE ON COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH HISTORY TAKING TECHNIQUES on PATIENTS TO PLEASE DO THIS WORK. PLEASE INCLUDE CITED SOURCES IN THIS ESSAY. PREPARE THIS ESSAY ACCORDING TO APA GUIDELINES. Comprehensive Health History Taking Techniques on Patients Patient's health history stands out as paramount towards patient's treatment despite all the advances resulting to technological sophistication in medicine practices (Lloyd & Craig, 2007). In the recent past, medical advances
Those who happen to be disproportionately affected by hypertension according to Elliot (2007) are African-Americans. Family history of BP also plays a prominent role in the prevalence of hypertension. In the words of Elliot (2007), "data consistently indicate that BP levels are hereditable." What this means is that studies have clearly demonstrated that an individual's risk of high blood pressure is largely dependent on whether or not there is
Building a health history with a new patient requires more than active listening and the development of trust and rapport. The intake interview and initial health assessment should be thorough, taking into account the area(s) in which the patient has lived, their workplace environment or work history, their family background and family health history, socioeconomic variables, and any other relevant environmental factors that may impact personal health. Of course, demographic