Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … human civilization, the unpredictable nature of cultural collisions has inevitably spawned conflict between neighbors and warfare between nations. While these brutal behaviors may be attributed vestigial links to innate animalistic instinct, the intellectual capacity which separates and elevates humanity has compelled thinkers of every generation to study and reflect on the nature of widespread conflict. Emerging from the meticulous documentation of official matters provided by monks in the early church, the role of the historian has been refined throughout the centuries, but their fundamental objective has remained essentially the same: to record the continuity of events as time progresses, from the mundane minutiae of municipal politics to the mobilization of military forces for armed conflict. As noted historian and Cold War strategist John Lewis Gaddis states in his comprehensive treatise on the profession, The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past, historians "pride ourselves on not trying to predict the future, as our colleagues in economics, sociology and political science attempt to do" but instead "advance bravely into the future with our eyes fixed firmly on the past."1 This distinction between historians and political scientists warrants further examination considering another of Gaddis' observations, which holds that "our modes...
John L. Gaddis, The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past (Oxford Press, 2002), p. 2
2. Ibid, p. 29
extrapolates his broader conclusion by identifying "the historian's version of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: the act of observation alters what's being observed."
The underlying assertion explored by Gaddis throughout The Landscape of History holds that historians and political scientists conduct their study of the past using distinctly divergent methodologies. As Gaddis explains in the fourth chapter of his book, "historians don't think in terms of dependent and independent variables & #8230; (but) rather assume the interdependency to trace their interconnections throughout time,"3 and this gulf between the identification of variables and their state of dependence practiced by political scientists, and the wider recognition of variables within a system applied by historians, forms the foundation of Gaddis' theoretical framework. In the historian's estimation, the seemingly routine outbreak of hostilities between nation-states which has defined human history for millennia is more than simply the byproduct of randomly occurring externalities, and instead represents a confluence of…
Bibliography
Gaddis, John L. The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. Oxford University
Press, 2002.
Khong, Yuen F. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam
Decisions of 1965, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), pp. 3-18 and 97-147.
Another explanation and reason of the necessity of war in Ancient Rome is economical. There are several different perspectives on this. First of all, the Roman society was essentially a society using extensively slave labor as the most important form of labor in existence. This basically ranged from constructions to simple chores around the house and often to farming as well, entertainment of its citizens and in other battles. A society
As was the nature of the Cold War, the United States responded by quashing new governments that were likely to lead to communism, even where this constituted an undemocratic or even brutal instituted government (Kort 80). Democratically elected officials from Brazil, Guyana, and Uruguay were overthrown by internal revolutionaries who were funded and trained by American forces (Parenti 44). These and other leaders and governments in Latin America were targeted
War in Defense of the Status Quo The ironic thing about the Korean War is that it was begun (by North Korea) in an attempt to change a status quo that no party involved was particularly satisfied with, in search of an end result that all parties agreed would be ideal (the unification of Korea), and millions of deaths later ended by reestablishing the same static situation it had originate to
" In addition, the war in Iraq has been another opportunity to see the effects of the weapons of mass destruction, which have caused the death of approximately 300 Americans and of a countless number of Iraqi people, in the American Government's point-of-view. Even though it has been sustained for many times that "the War of Terror" is useless and meaningless, many scholars, such as David Tufte, sustain that "The short-run
Sociologists do not see war as something humanity is genetically programmed to do, but the result of social forces. Why do they believe this? What is the evidence? If war is not caused by biology, what are some of the social forces that sociologists argue have contributed to it? Illustrate your points with concrete examples from the readings. According to Howard Zinn, there is no evidence that human beings are innately
Economics in Ancient Civilization It is said that "Rome was not built in a day." Indeed, the Roman Empire was the last of a series of civilizations to emerge in the Mediterranean by the First Millennium, B.C. Precursors to the culture most identified as the seat of Western political economy, the Ancient Egyptians, Etruscans, Greeks, Syrians, Carthaginians and Phoenicians all had contact with the Romans, and eventually were incorporated through territorial