Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
War Since 1945
As far as we know, war has been a part of human history and civilization since prehistoric times, so for one to simply assume that a world without war is inevitable is indeed incorrect. War is part of the greatness of human history as well as the dark side of human behavior -- associated often with terror, cruelty and mayhem. Yet over the centuries as humans have developed in so many ways, warfare is a constant part of the ability for states to settle their differences. Traditional military planning focused on the ideas of "might is right," yet after 1945 and the beginnings of the Cold War, this was only partially true.
History Professor Jeremy Black, for instance, believes that military doctrine and traditional foreign policy are inadequate to explain war post-World War II. Of course, the 20th century was filled with warfare -- the bloodiest century ever. Nevertheless, after World War II, after the dawn of the Atomic Age, and certainly the paradigm of the Cold War as a "war" but not a war, has changed the way we need to think about the process in order to understand modern conflict. Certainly, the amount of technological chance in the 20th century allowed warfare to kill or maim at an unprecedented level. In fact, once the Atom Bomb was dropped on Hiroshima...
85-6).
Black points to major changes that contribute to this new model: an increase in guerrilla warfare and terrorism (Vietnam, Afghanistan, the Middle East, etc.), a decrease in counting on traditional forms of warfare like airpower, and the robust growth of machinery from capitalism and industrialization -- machines must be built, designed, used and new ways of killing must be developed. This then genders a psychological change in military planning. The very cycles that perpetuate the business of war similarly affect the logic that there must always be an identifiable threat, real or imagined, else, there is no longer a need for the military-industrial complex (Black, pp. 32-34; 72-78).
A primary example of these thematic changes is the Hukbalahap Rebellion (Huk) which occurred in the Philippines between 1946 and 1954. The Huks, or anti-Japanese soldiers, revolted against the Philippine government. Instead of a grand political stance, the Huk Rebellion was based on a socio-economic issue…
Sources
Black, J. (2004). War Since 1945. London: Reaktion Books.
Joes, A. (2010). Counterinsurgency in the Philippines 1898-1954, in Marston, D. And Malkasian, C., eds. Counterinsurgency in Modern Warfare. Westminster, MD: Osprey Publications.
Moyer, M. (2009). A Question of Command: Counterinsurgency from the Civil War to Iraq. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hiroshima Bombing The Manhattan Project When I was asked to work on the Manhattan project during the late 1930's, I was delighted to be included in work of such magnitude. Not only would I work with the most prominent scientists in the world; I would also make a substantial contribution to the United States Government and its effort to keep the country safe. Recently however I have begun experiencing considerable ambivalence regarding the
The reverend did hard work during the after math of the bombing and was dedicated to help the survivors. He later on became a peace activist and traveled to the U.S. To give speeches and have TV appearances and raised money for the surviving victim's treatments. Mr. Tanimoto is a more complex and complicated person in this novel and shows that he has ties to the U.S. He is acting
bombing of Hiroshima raises some significant ethical issues. From a military perspective, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki served as the catalyst for bringing about Japanese surrender, thereby ending the war in the Pacific. However, these attacks on civilian targets were among the most horrific in the history of wartime. Such attacks would be outlawed today under the Fourth Geneva Convention, which was enacted in 1949 partly as a
This new warfare had psychological as well as purely physical aspects of battle. The will of the Japanese people themselves had to be annihilated by snuffing out the lives of sufficient hundreds of thousands of them. The old weapons were simply not sufficient anymore for the effect. Ironically, this most savage warfare is conceived and carried out by the most rational of scientists, senior military men and politicians who coat
Indeed, there is no moral argument to justify the use of weapons against possible civilians. The nuclear bomb lacks any precision in targeting solely military targets without causing casualties. Although its use cannot be justified from a moral perspective, it can be seen as a means to put an end to a war that had taken millions of lives up to 1945. The impact the attacks had on Japan
Dropping the Atom Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki During World War II, a mid-20th-century conflict that involved several nations, the United States military dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Wikipedia, 2005). The first atomic bomb was exploded over Hiroshima on August 5, 1945; the second was detonated over Nagasaki four days later. The bombs killed more than 120,000 people immediately and about twice as many over