Improving Patient Outcomes By Using Biomedical Devices Research Paper

PAGES
9
WORDS
2655
Cite
Related Topics:

The Use of Biomedical Devices to Improve Patient Outcomes Abstract

There have been tremendous advancements that have been made in the field of biomedical devices. All the advancements have been aimed at improving patient outcomes and preventing infections especially in orthopedic surgeries. Biomedical devices have offered an opportunity to doctors and researchers to improve upon their products with an aim of improving the patient’s quality of life. Infection reduction and readmission rates have also been reduced. Biomechanics in surgery keep improving every day, such as better products that help better ERAS for patients. Doctors and researchers keep improving their products to make risk factors minimal and to create better and longer lasting products for patients of the present and future generations.

Introduction

There have been tremendous advances in biomedical devices and they keep improving with each passing day. These advances are aimed at improving patient outcomes and making more efficient products than in the past years. Researchers and doctors are continuously seeking better and new methods for improving the products in order to benefit their patients in the future (Rose, Cahill?Rowley and Butler). This continuous hunger for improvement has resulted in devices that are easier to use, reduce the length of stay in hospitals, and lower the risk of infection. In the past the rate of infection due to the use of biomedical devices was high and patients were afraid of using biomedical devices for fear of developing an infection. However, with the advancements in technology and push by researchers and doctors to improve on the devices, the rates of infections have decreased tremendously. The use of biomedical devices has also increased and there are numerous new devices that are targeted at improving patient outcomes and giving patients a better quality of life (Auyong et al.). There have also been advancements in minimally invasive surgeries that ensure that there is minimal trauma to the patient. Minimal invasive surgeries lead to a shorter recovery time for the patient and also reduces complications (Hebl et al.). Without advanced biomedical devices, this would not be possible. This paper aims at reviewing past literature regarding the advances in biomedical devices in surgery. The paper aims at demonstrating the impact that advances in biomedical devices have had on patients especially in regards to better recovery times, advances in products, and what the future holds. We hypothesize that advances in biomedical devices in surgery will reduce patient stays in hospital, offer better recovery for patients, advances in the products, and the future of biomedical devices.

Background

Biomedical devices have been in use for the longest time ever. Modern technology has allowed for the use of biomedical devices in a variety of ways to improve patient outcomes. In the past, most devices were not aimed at improving patient outcomes and the length of stay in hospitals was higher than expected. Doctors have always had a desire to ensure that they are able to reduce patient trauma during and after a surgery (Auyong et al.). In the past, many surgical procedures required that patients undergo open surgery even when the procedure could be easily done using minimally invasive strategies. However, due to lack of better devices, there were no alternatives and patients were forced to stay in hospitals for longer periods. Patients also had a higher rate of infection after undergoing an orthopedic surgery. This increased rate of infection was mostly due to the use of biomedical devices and this results in the removal and replacement of the device (Hebl et al.).

One hundred years ago there was little on offer in terms of medical devices and medical electronics areas. However, in the following 100 years, there have been tremendous improvements in this field and...

...

All these advances stemmed from the three main technologies of the stethoscope, electrocardiography, and X-ray medical imaging. Building upon these three technologies has allowed for the development of better devices that are aimed at improving the quality of life of patients and making surgery less invasive. A total hip replacement was not something that was possible in the past. This is now something that can be easily done and the patient recovery process is simplified.
The desire to improve patient outcomes and offer better solutions to patients has led to the developments we have seen in the biomedical devices. It is not possible to replace a worn-out knee or even perform a total hip replacement with reduced risks of infection (Hebl et al.). The devices are now better made and the chances of a patient getting an infection due to the effect of the device have been reduced tenfold. With the increase in total knee arthroplasty in the past decade, it was predicted that a decrease in the length of hospital stay would result in the increase in post-operative complications (Long). However, this has not been the case and the opposite happened. Currently, there are less post-operative complications and the length of hospital stay has been reduced by up to 40 percent (Holzapfel et al.). By incorporating recent innovations, it is possible to decrease the postoperative length of stay without increasing the rates of readmission.

The use of procedures that are less invasive has been beneficial to the patients and this has increased the patient’s outcomes. Less invasive procedures result in reduces chances of infection and reduce the recovery period for the patient. A speedier recovery is beneficial to the patient in that they spend less time in the hospital and the financial burden is also reduced. Advancements in biomechanical devices have made it possible to a heart surgery to be performed without the need to fully open up the heart. This makes the procedure much safer and it is easier on the patient. There are reduced risks of complications since the procedure does not require the patient to be fully opened up. Biomechanical devices have advanced tremendously and they have made it easy for the doctors to perform procedures that were previously considered risky (Holzapfel et al.).

Advancements have also been made in the materials being used to develop the biomechanical devices. The use of longer-lasting materials ensures that the devices have better properties like corrosion resistance, rigidity, stiffness, strength, long fatigue life, biocompatibility, and fracture toughness. The use of longer lasting devices reduces the need for the patient to undergo another replacement due to wear and tear of the implant. This is also beneficial to the patient in that they will have a better quality of life and not have to worry about their implant failing. The materials in use today have been overly researched and it has been established that they are the best and they will offer the best guarantee to the patient.

Hypothesis Studies

As earlier indicated, we have identified three main hypothesis and they are better recovery, advances in products, and the future of biomedical devices. Better recovery or lower chances of infection for the patient has been shown to be possible and as Campoccia, Montanaro and Arciola indicate there have been significant strategies that have been aimed at preventing implant infections. Prevention should be the main goal as is the case in other medical fields. Therefore, there is a need to ensure that the implants being used will not lead to infection of the patient. The need to prevent contamination during implant installation has been overemphasized. Implant materials have been shown to contribute towards post-surgical infections because they present a site for host defenses where…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Auyong, David B, et al. "Reduced Length of Hospitalization in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Using an Updated Enhanced Recovery after Orthopedic Surgery (Eras) Pathway." The Journal of arthroplasty 30.10 (2015): 1705-09. Print.

Campoccia, Davide, Lucio Montanaro, and Carla Renata Arciola. "The Significance of Infection Related to Orthopedic Devices and Issues of Antibiotic Resistance." Biomaterials 27.11 (2006): 2331-39. Print.

Christenson, Elizabeth M, et al. "Nanobiomaterial Applications in Orthopedics." Journal of Orthopaedic Research 25.1 (2007): 11-22. Print.

Goodman, Stuart B, et al. "The Future of Biologic Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants." Biomaterials 34.13 (2013): 3174-83. Print.

Hamed, Abbi, et al. "Advances in Haptics, Tactile Sensing, and Manipulation for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery, Noninvasive Surgery, and Diagnosis." Journal of Robotics 2012 (2012). Print.

Hannan, Mahammad A, et al. "Energy Harvesting for the Implantable Biomedical Devices: Issues and Challenges." Biomedical engineering online 13.1 (2014): 79. Print.

Hebl, James R, et al. "A Pre-Emptive Multimodal Pathway Featuring Peripheral Nerve Block Improves Perioperative Outcomes after Major Orthopedic Surgery." Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 33.6 (2008): 510-17. Print.

Holzapfel, Boris Michael, et al. "How Smart Do Biomaterials Need to Be? A Translational Science and Clinical Point of View." Advanced drug delivery reviews 65.4 (2013): 581-603. Print.


Cite this Document:

"Improving Patient Outcomes By Using Biomedical Devices" (2018, October 15) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/improving-patient-outcomes-biomedical-devices-research-paper-2172426

"Improving Patient Outcomes By Using Biomedical Devices" 15 October 2018. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/improving-patient-outcomes-biomedical-devices-research-paper-2172426>

"Improving Patient Outcomes By Using Biomedical Devices", 15 October 2018, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/improving-patient-outcomes-biomedical-devices-research-paper-2172426

Related Documents

Stevens Star Model and New Tech to Improve Patient OutcomesThe Stevens Star Model of Knowledge Transformation is a framework that guides the transformation of knowledge from research into practice. This model consists of five points: discovery, summary, translation, integration, and evaluation. Each point represents a step in the process of moving from scientific evidence to practical application in patient care (Song et al., 2021). This paper shows how in the

Improving Healthcare Delivery in Nursing Homes: Focus on Broken Bones The objective of this study is to focus on health care management issues, problems, and policies in a current organization and specifically that of a nursing home with a focus on broken bones. Identification of Problem Osteoporosis and fracture related to osteoporosis "are primary health concerns and sources of significant death and disability around the world." (Clinton, 2011) In 2006, it is stated

Nurse-Patient Relations The main focus of this essay is going to concern the nurse-patient relationship idea, and why it is important. This was chosen because the researcher desired to achieve a better accepting of how a helpful nurse-patient relationship can be advanced and even from different theorists who have discovered this idea. In this essay, the researcher sets out to demonstrate what they have learnt regarding the nurse-patient relation concept and

Translating Biomedical Innovation / Mental Health and well being Managing Ideas: Commercialization Strategies for Biotechnology This article by Joshua and Scott Focuses on the commercialization aspect of biotechnology and stresses how important it is for innovators in the new and fast developing field of biotechnology to effectively forge collaboration with existing pharmaceutical market leaders in order to successfully create a new and strong value proposition for the healthcare sector. Biotech firms have

New Technology the Best Cure
PAGES 50 WORDS 13809

Taken in isolation, some of the new, minimally-invasive procedures are less expensive by far, when analyzed on a procedure-by-procedure basis, than previous significant surgical interventions, as demonstrated below: Procedure Cost Estimated duration of 'cure' CABG 5-7 years PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention 3-5 years Based on the above analysis, it would appear to be clear that a PCI is more cost-effective than CABG procedures. This may not be true when all costs are considered, however. The logic of

Invention and Summarize the Significance of the Underlying Technology Innovation The device titled the Thornton Adjustable Positioner or TAP is an oral/dental device worn in the patient's mouth during sleep to move the lower jaw slightly forward to create an open airway for proper breathing while sleeping. The device or some like them have been previously tried on minor sleep disturbances such as snoring, yet, their efficacy has been unknown