The Use of Biomedical Devices to Improve Patient Outcomes
Abstract
There have been tremendous advancements that have been made in the field of biomedical devices. All the advancements have been aimed at improving patient outcomes and preventing infections especially in orthopedic surgeries. Biomedical devices have offered an opportunity to doctors and researchers to improve upon their products with an aim of improving the patient’s quality of life. Infection reduction and readmission rates have also been reduced. Biomechanics in surgery keep improving every day, such as better products that help better ERAS for patients. Doctors and researchers keep improving their products to make risk factors minimal and to create better and longer lasting products for patients of the present and future generations.
Introduction
There have been tremendous advances in biomedical devices and they keep improving with each passing day. These advances are aimed at improving patient outcomes and making more efficient products than in the past years. Researchers and doctors are continuously seeking better and new methods for improving the products in order to benefit their patients in the future (Rose, Cahill?Rowley and Butler). This continuous hunger for improvement has resulted in devices that are easier to use, reduce the length of stay in hospitals, and lower the risk of infection. In the past the rate of infection due to the use of biomedical devices was high and patients were afraid of using biomedical devices for fear of developing an infection. However, with the advancements in technology and push by researchers and doctors to improve on the devices, the rates of infections have decreased tremendously. The use of biomedical devices has also increased and there are numerous new devices that are targeted at improving patient outcomes and giving patients a better quality of life (Auyong et al.). There have also been advancements in minimally invasive surgeries that ensure that there is minimal trauma to the patient. Minimal invasive surgeries lead to a shorter recovery time for the patient and also reduces complications (Hebl et al.). Without advanced biomedical devices, this would not be possible. This paper aims at reviewing past literature regarding the advances in biomedical devices in surgery. The paper aims at demonstrating the impact that advances in biomedical devices have had on patients especially in regards to better recovery times, advances in products, and what the future holds. We hypothesize that advances in biomedical devices in surgery will reduce patient stays in hospital, offer better recovery for patients, advances in the products, and the future of biomedical devices.
Background
Biomedical devices have been in use for the longest time ever. Modern technology has allowed for the use of biomedical devices in a variety of ways to improve patient outcomes. In the past, most devices were not aimed at improving patient outcomes and the length of stay in hospitals was higher than expected. Doctors have always had a desire to ensure that they are able to reduce patient trauma during and after a surgery (Auyong et al.). In the past, many surgical procedures required that patients undergo open surgery even when the procedure could be easily done using minimally invasive strategies. However, due to lack of better devices, there were no alternatives and patients were forced to stay in hospitals for longer periods. Patients also had a higher rate of infection after undergoing an orthopedic surgery. This increased rate of infection was mostly due to the use of biomedical devices and this results in the removal and replacement of the device (Hebl et al.).
One hundred years ago there was little on offer in terms of medical devices and medical electronics areas. However, in the following 100 years, there have been tremendous improvements in this field and...
References
Auyong, David B, et al. "Reduced Length of Hospitalization in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Using an Updated Enhanced Recovery after Orthopedic Surgery (Eras) Pathway." The Journal of arthroplasty 30.10 (2015): 1705-09. Print.
Campoccia, Davide, Lucio Montanaro, and Carla Renata Arciola. "The Significance of Infection Related to Orthopedic Devices and Issues of Antibiotic Resistance." Biomaterials 27.11 (2006): 2331-39. Print.
Christenson, Elizabeth M, et al. "Nanobiomaterial Applications in Orthopedics." Journal of Orthopaedic Research 25.1 (2007): 11-22. Print.
Goodman, Stuart B, et al. "The Future of Biologic Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants." Biomaterials 34.13 (2013): 3174-83. Print.
Hamed, Abbi, et al. "Advances in Haptics, Tactile Sensing, and Manipulation for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery, Noninvasive Surgery, and Diagnosis." Journal of Robotics 2012 (2012). Print.
Hannan, Mahammad A, et al. "Energy Harvesting for the Implantable Biomedical Devices: Issues and Challenges." Biomedical engineering online 13.1 (2014): 79. Print.
Hebl, James R, et al. "A Pre-Emptive Multimodal Pathway Featuring Peripheral Nerve Block Improves Perioperative Outcomes after Major Orthopedic Surgery." Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 33.6 (2008): 510-17. Print.
Holzapfel, Boris Michael, et al. "How Smart Do Biomaterials Need to Be? A Translational Science and Clinical Point of View." Advanced drug delivery reviews 65.4 (2013): 581-603. Print.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now