Information Technology Acts While Information Technology Today Research Paper

Information Technology Acts While information technology today has many distinct advantages, it is also important to acknowledge that there are some specific potential drawbacks. These drawbacks relate especially to the right to privacy of people making use of information technology. Users of Internet subscription services, for example, expect certain privacy rights in terms of the contact and personal information they choose to divulge. At the same time, large institutions like learning establishments and health insurance companies are required to provide their clients with a certain level of privacy assurance. For this reason, certain technological advances have required a revision of legislation to ensure that the privacy of citizens is protected. Two such pieces of legislation include The Family Education Rights And Privacy Act (FERPA) of 1974 and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996.

FERPA

The Family Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 was passed to address the right to privacy for students at learning institutions. Under the act,...

...

Further, such release is subject to permission from students, who also have a right to request that incorrect information be modified. In most other cases, release of information requires written permission (Shiley, 2003).
One of the primary reasons for this law was widespread concern, during the early 1970s, about the potential of the federal government to abuse its power and to implement domestic surveillance. The concern was that governmental information technology has advanced to such a degree that it could be used to identify, observe, and cross-reference "suspicious" persons. A government database, for example, could be used to access student data regarding the direction of study, social or government groups that are identified as potentially harmful to the government and is security. Also, increased media accessibility and technology has brought to light government practices that have been hidden in the past. Hence, the public concern has been raised because of…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Gilland, A.T. (2011, Jan). Balancing between two goods: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and ethical compliancy considerations for privacy-sensitive materials in health sciences archival and historical special collections. Journal of Medical Library Association, Vol. 99 No. 1. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016646/

Shiley, C.S. (2003, Jun). Putting the Rights into the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act: Enforcement and the Private Right of Action. Retrieved from: http://www.mit.edu/people/cshiley/Thesis/DANCE-DANCE-FERPA.pdf


Cite this Document:

"Information Technology Acts While Information Technology Today" (2013, June 05) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/information-technology-acts-while-information-91544

"Information Technology Acts While Information Technology Today" 05 June 2013. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/information-technology-acts-while-information-91544>

"Information Technology Acts While Information Technology Today", 05 June 2013, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/information-technology-acts-while-information-91544

Related Documents

Another study found that there are many different strategies that are utilized when information technology is developed within the federal government and many of these tend to come not from the top managers but from the management instead (Gupta, Holladay, & Mahoney, 2000). Much of this has to do with the fact that the top managers in the federal government are often political appointees and therefore know somewhat less about

Technology in Healthcare
PAGES 3 WORDS 1048

Technology in Healthcare It is a fact of life today that technology pervades everything. It is hardly a surprise that this is true for health care as well. Indeed, the very nature of health care, in that it provides human beings with a better chance at a higher quality of life, requires that some degree of technology is necessary. This is also important in terms of leadership in health care. If

A third real-life example are the pervasive Healthcare Information Systems (HIS) and Patient Information Management Systems (PIMS) that form the backbone of any healthcare facility. These are systems that capture all relevant patient demographic, treatment and health-related data in addition to showing the specific costs of treatment and profits as well (McGurkin, Hart, Millinghausen, 2006). In short, these systems form the basic financial structure of a healthcare systems. There are

This is necessary to provide a seamless platform on which health solutions can be effectively integrated and deployed. Without using such a platform, the development of electronic health care facilities will be more difficult to deploy. In other words, Tele-health is part of the overall healthcare ICT (Information Communications Technology) solutions that enables healthcare to be pushed out to the edge, for local delivery, and to be more evenly,

" (Doukas, Maglogiannis and Kormentzas, 2006) The following illustration shows the evaluation Platform Architecture. Figure 3 The Evaluation Platform Architecture Doukas, Maglogiannis and Kormentzas (2006) state that the patient state vital signs are monitored through a PDA device attached to the patient and transmitted to a computer for evaluation through wireless access or Bluetooth. Additionally the patient site is monitored through use of a camera. The software that has been developed is used

Technology and Social Responsibility The objective of this study is to answer the following three questions: (1) What are three major factors fueling international technological growth? Explain the ways in which those factors impede or support corporate social responsibility. (2) What major corporate social responsibility issues arise out of the use of technology and scientific research? And (3) Compare and contrast organizational self-regulation vs. governmental regulation on issues such as eugenics,