In conjunction with the PMO organizational structure, there are contract management process workflows that ensure airlines meet the specifications of customers. This is comparable to the engineer-to-order set of processes at Airbus yet more quickly executed to customers' specific requirements (Berman, 2004). This product development process concentrates on the PMO also coordinating next -- generation product strategies as well, with Boeing choosing energy efficiency over larger, more expensive yet more profitable planes to build.
Strategies compared: Airbus and Boeing
From the highly collaborative approach of Airbus to the project-driven strategies of Boeing, each is ideally suited for any given product strategy. Airbus ironically has created product development strategies that align perfectly with the needs of lower-cost, more energy-efficient commercial jets, yet is stressing their product development process with the behemoth A380. Contrary to their product development strategy is Boeing, which is orientated and based on a centralized PMO strategy, Airbus relies on an engineer-to-order strategy that works for component-based manufacturing. The challenge for each is the scalability of their new product development processes to support their future product strategies. For Boeing, their concentration on using CAD-based applications including standardizing the entire Model 777 development on Dassualt Software is a caser in point. The role of the PMO office and contract management, in conjunction with Engineering Change orders (ECO) is critical to their future product strategy. Boeing is more adept with its internal processes to create an A380 while Airbus excels at interlinking processes for supporting lower-end commercial jet production, which has historically been their strongest market strategy (Anderson, Sedatole, 1998).
Competition in high-speed jet liners
The competition for commercial jet airliners is in a mature stage of its product lifecycle, and estimates of the market contracting (Holmes, 2007) have been reported by a variety of research firms in the industry. Despite the slow-down in this industry, Airbus still leads the market with 29.6% followed by Boeing with 25.3% (Holmes (a), 2007). Table 1 provides the worldwide market shares of commercial jet manufacturers.
Table 1: Worldwide Market Share of Commercial Jet Manufacturers
Market Share Range
European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS N.V.
The Boeing Company
United Technologies Corporation
First, concentrating on making their product strategy align more with their innate strengths and allowing suppliers to manage interrelationships between themselves more. This will greatly reduce confusion and increase shared knowledge throughout their supply chains. Second, Airbus needs to standardize on components interfaces and subassembly standards, which it has not yet done across all subsidiaries, to support greater coordination across its entire supplier base. Third, the financing and capitalization of Airbus needs to be structured more as a Joint Venture and less as a subsidiary-based model, as it is today. The reliance on European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS N.V. has proven to be problematic and not capable of absorbing all the risk of this unique manufacturing consortium to this point.
Shannon W. Anderson, Karen Sedatole. (1998). Designing quality into products: The use of accounting data in new product development. Accounting Horizons, 12(3), 213-233. Retrieved September 23, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 34653543).
Phyllis Berman (2004, February). Beating Boeing. Forbes, 173(3), 129. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 576816811).
Business: The super-jumbo of all gambles; Airbus vs. Boeing. (2005, January). The Economist, 374(8410), 55-56. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 782135091).
Stanley Holmes (2007, January). The Secret Weapon at Boeing. Business Week,(4016), 34. Retrieved September 24, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 1189394571).
Stanley Holmes (2007, February). The Battle for Air Supremacy Business Week, (4020), 102. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 1211414321).
Douglas a Irwin, Nina Pavcnik. (2004). Airbus vs. Boeing revisited: international competition in the aircraft market. Journal of International Economics, 4(2), 223-245. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 710579571).
Max Kingsley-Jones, Guy Norris. (2005, November). Enhanced A340 set to take on…
Toyota's system is superior. 2) Toyota's arms-length relationship spread the risk of overcapacity with the suppliers and reduced capital expenditures. Toyota was able to maintain the same degree of production flexibility and quality control by contracting out. The major drawback of Toyota's system was a dependence on other companies for supplies. There was also the risk of a supplier going out of business. American manufacturers did not have this risk. 3)
Airbus Corporate Strategy Business Level Corporate Level Strategies Business-Level Corporate-Level Strategies Airbus Business-Level Corporate-Level Strategies Airbus Airbus is a company that manufactures aircrafts. Airbus follows the corporate strategy of its holding company EADS that is European aerospace company. Airbus is based in France and has extended operations in Europe. Airbus produces about 50% of the world's jet airliners. With around 63,000 employee force, the company has designed more than dozen aircrafts. The company had 4,682 aircrafts
International Trade Because of the increasingly globalized nature of the economy, manufacturers, retailers and service providers have more options to locate sources of supply and labor where overall costs are lower than in their home markets. In industry today, parts and supplies frequently come from many different countries, such as the Boeing 787, with 65% of its components outsources to foreign companies (Hill 2011). Another example is flat-screen TVs, which have
Boeing is one of the United States' largest exporters and is a predominant aerospace and defense corporation. Boeing is the world's largest global aircraft manufacturer (by deliveries and revenue), and the second-largest defense and aerospace contractor (ranking in Defense News). The history of Boeing is as exciting as any in history, and encompasses thousands of individuals, innovations, and spectacular technological developments in airline design and manufacturing. Of course, most everyone
The EU, as a coherent political entity, is a rising political power on the world stage. It is expected to provide a much-needed geopolitical counterweight to the United States and China. However, it can only do this if it can establish an aircraft industry and military industrial base large enough to command the attention of the U.S. The Current Status of the Airbus-Boeing WTO Dispute In May 18, 2011, the WTO
Introduction – Boeing and Airbus Airbus mission and vision: Airbus is commonly known to be the most popular commercial aircraft headquartered out of Toulouse France. With small and huge airliners, that can seat 100 to 500 passengers, the company has a global human resource of over 50,000 and aircraft strength of over 16,000. Being over 4 decades old, it has a loyal customer base that lays the foundation for its mission