Investing In A Company The Thesis

Length: 5 pages Sources: 2 Subject: Business Type: Thesis Paper: #24999831 Related Topics: Cola Wars, Coca Cola, Alcoholic Beverage, Debt
Excerpt from Thesis :

The slight decline in the cash ratio is not considered to be of significance in light of the generally solid current and quick ratios. The improvement in times interest earned comes in the face of a significant increase in long-term debt at PepsiCo. The company's debt ratio increased to 50.2% from 48.6%. This was largely a consequence of a nearly 65% increase in long-term debt.

Pepsi's operating margin is 18.1%, down slightly from 18.5% in 2006 and 18.37% in 2005. The company's ability to maintain margin stability illustrates strong managerial control over the company's cost structure. This is because Pepsi has little control over costs in the ultra-competitive segments in which they operate. They also have little control over factor costs such as high fructose corn syrup, the cost of which is based on commodity costs. The company's net margin declined slightly in 2007 to 14.3% from 16.05% in 2006, but up from 12.5% in 2005. The company improved its earning per share slightly in 2007. Overall, profitability has been steady at Pepsi. The company has been able to grow sales without adding extra costs to their operations.

In terms of managerial efficiency, Pepsi's return on assets decreased to 16.3% from 18.8%. The return on equity declined to 32.3% from 36.5%. The decline in return on equity relates to the upward shift in leverage at Pepsi. The decline in the return on assets is more disappointing, as it confirms that managerial efficiency has declined slightly at PepsiCo in the past year. However, the company remains more efficient that Coca-Cola Corporation.

As an Equity Investment

At the end of 2007, Coke was trading at 61.37, for a P/E of 23.69 (MSN Moneycentral, 2009). PepsiCo was trading at 75.90, for a P/E of 21.81. Pepsi's quarterly dividend had risen to 75 cents per share; Coke's was now at 68 cents per share. Thus, Pepsi's dividend yield was 3.9% while Coke's dividend yield was 4.4%.

Therefore, PepsiCo is a more prudent equity investment. The company's financials are stronger in most respects. Pepsi has better product diversification. Pepsi has stronger cost controls. The dividend yield is lower, but the P/E is lower and Pepsi's cost controls give them greater opportunity to enjoy sustained, controlled earnings growth. In terms of broad strategy, Pepsi has been more aggressive moving...


This has given Pepsi the opportunity to win market share in new segments more rapidly than Coke. However, in terms of core products, Pepsi remains the #2 and has struggled to make gains. Their differentiation is a natural response to the situation they face with their flagship product. It is believed that their strategic goals, cost controls and higher efficiency will allow them differential growth that is sufficient to make up the difference in dividend yield between the two companies.

As a Debt Investment

The decision to make a debt investment is guided less by long-term strategic considerations than by the company's capacity to meet its obligations. Both firms have similar capital structures and both have increased their long-term debt in the past year. Pepsi, however, has better liquidity in all metrics. Their times interest earned is double that of Coca-Cola. Despite growth in long-term debt, Pepsi has maintained relative consistency in their capital structure, while Coke has increased their leverage considerably in the past year. Of special concern is the fact that Coke borrowed $1.75 billion in long-term notes to pay down short-term obligations. Some of this was ultimately used to finance acquisitions, but this practice seems incongruent with sound financial management. Both companies are perfectly solvent. It is worth noting that Moody's has rated Pepsi Aa2 and Coke Aa3. This means that Coca-Cola bonds can be expected to have a higher yield than equivalent Pepsi bonds. This supports my contention that Pepsi is the better debt investment of the two. The only caveat to that assessment is that because Coca-Cola is solvent, the higher yields on their bonds may make them a more attractive assessment. Without specific bond quotes to work with, however, I recommend investing in Pepsi debt.


Both Coke and Pepsi are strong, profitable companies. They are both liquid, make good margins and have decent managerial…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Coca-Cola Co. 2007 Form 10-K.

PepsiCo 2007 Annual Report

MSN Moneycentral. Retrieved March 24, 2009 at

Cite this Document:

"Investing In A Company The" (2009, March 24) Retrieved September 19, 2021, from

"Investing In A Company The" 24 March 2009. Web.19 September. 2021. <>

"Investing In A Company The", 24 March 2009, Accessed.19 September. 2021,

Purpose of

The documents we provide are to be used as a sample, template, outline, guideline in helping you write your own paper, not to be used for academic credit. All users must abide by our "Student Honor Code" or you will be restricted access to our website.

Related Documents
Investing Capital Mutual Fund Investing Is Important
Words: 2055 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Economics Paper #: 33337661

Investing Capital Mutual fund Investing is important for it ensures that at the end of a certain period you can benefit out of your invested money. Investing can be done through investment funds. Investing funds are collective investment schemes that require investor to create a pool of capital and in return the investor enjoys wide diversification, professional management, and lower costs that would have been otherwise impossible using a small amount of

Investing in a New Production Facility the
Words: 1415 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Business - Management Paper #: 45418680

Investing in a New Production Facility The automobile industry is increasingly taking advantage of the optimistic automobile market through producing more technologically sophisticated and luxurious motor vehicles. The vehicles despite targeting the wealthy in the society have been received positively by the automobile market. Particularly the four-wheel-drive model has become popular for two major reasons, image and up-country drive particularly on complex landscape. Having identified its personal interest areas, ABC Company

Company's Compensation and Benefit Package a Number
Words: 893 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Careers Paper #: 61458841

Company's Compensation And Benefit Package A number of factors determine how a company compensates its employees. These factors may include economics, psychology and even sociology. To an economist compensation is viewed as a labor market determinant (Filer, Hammermesh, & Rees, 1996). As a human resource manager for Vanguard Industries I have been entrusted with the responsibility of explaining to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) that guided my development of the company's

Investing in Walt Disney Company Characteristics of
Words: 987 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Economics Paper #: 8011589

Investing in Walt Disney Company Characteristics of its bonds Apparently, Disney's bonds seem to be in an enticing situation. After a dip during the past years, Disney's bonds seem to be in great demand. In June of this year -- little less than 3 months ago - it offered a 3.75% banking 10-year paper with over $25mm. This was the hot-shot then, specially in a time when post-holiday trade was lax, and

Investing: "What Does It Take
Words: 648 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Economics Paper #: 10932151

For life changing events and complicated financial matters, they suggest turning to the financial advisors at TMF Money Advisor, due to their reputable handlings of finances. After all is set to invest, the next step is to plan out your attack. Set exact amounts and do research on market trends to find which is the best place for your money. Next, the fools discuss where to get started in actually

Company Analysis of Yahoo I
Words: 2043 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Business Paper #: 46482416

Yahoo is definitely facing difficult challenges in the near future. Consumption is probably going down, but that is not something that will only affect Yahoo! The competition will also be seriously shaken. Another aspect that the firm's managers should consider is the more personalized approach proposed by Google. The G-mail service will be tailored to fit the desires of each and every user. The needs of each person, as manifested