¶ … Life Insurance a Good Investment?
Life insurance may be grouped into two basic categories: term and whole life insurance. The primary difference between term and whole life insurance is that a term policy is life coverage only. In the case of death of the insured, term insurance pays the face amount of the policy to the named beneficiary. Term insurance may be purchased for periods of 1 to 30 years. Whole life insurance combines a term policy with an additional investment component. The investment may be comprised of bonds, money-market funds, or stocks (Feldpausch, 2004). This type of policy builds cash value that one may borrow against. The three most common types of whole life insurance are traditional whole life policies, universal and variable. Whole life and term insurance policies allow one to lock in the same monthly payment over the life of the policy.
Overall, whole life insurance carries many disadvantages. First, this type of policy is very expensive because payments are applied to the insurance component plus the investment portion. Typically, the investments offered with these plans are not good investment vehicles. Aside from the fact that there are many other ways to save for retirement, these policies come with high fees and commissions, which may take as much as 3% from the annual return (Kane, 2002). Furthermore, there are often up-front, hidden commissions that are typically 100% of the first year's premium (Kane, 2002). Finally, it is often difficult to determine what the return on the investment will be and how much of the payment is applied toward the insurance and how much toward the investment.
Premiums for term insurance are typically inexpensive for individuals in good health through the age of 50 years. Thereafter, premiums progressively get more expensive (Feldpausch, 2004). The same rate expenses hold true for whole life policies. However, individuals who require coverage starting in their 60s and beyond may have no alternative but to buy a whole life policy because most companies will not sell term policies to people over age 65 years.
The key consideration for a whole life policy is its internal rate of return, or the yield on the policy after all fees and charges are subtracted (Hasman, Chittenden, Doolin, & Wall, 2004). A competent analysis can determine at a minimum whether the weight of the fees and charges built into one of these policies will ever allow a worthwhile return. Such an analysis will also pinpoint the minimum amount of cash value that you can derive from a policy at any given time interval.
Most whole life policies do not begin to build adequate cash value until the 12th or 15th year. If an individual is looking for whole life coverage or a term life policy to keep until retirement, the financial soundness of the insurer is a critical concern. The most financially sound insurers are rated AAA, though some rating agencies use slightly different letter grades (Kane, 2002).
You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.