Kant Our Knowledge Relates To Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
970
Cite
Related Topics:

All other conceptions of sensibility are subject to these elements. Intuition is the representation of phenomena, which exist only in space and time, which in turn exist only as a result of the human mind. The human being knows only so much as his mode of perception. Nothing beyond this can be known, experienced or investigated. Space and time are pure forms of perception, in which sensation is matter. As such, human beings can never achieve complete cognition of things in themselves, but rather, by investigating these things, an understanding is achieved of the human mode of intuition or sensibility. No synthetic cognitions is possible from conceptions or intuitions; only analytical conceptions are indeed possible in this way. Intuition culminates in a set of relations, which translates to human perception. The same is the case with the internal intuition, because the representation of the external senses constitutes the material with which the mind is occupied. Another aspect of this reason is also that time lies at the foundation of this material, and we place our experiences and representations in time. Furthermore, time precedes the consciousness of and representations of experience. It also contains the relations of the successive, the coexistent, and the permanent.

Intuition in turn precedes the exercise of thought in relation to objects. When the intuition contains only relations, it is referred to as form, while everything represented through the medium of sense is...

...

It follows that the consciousness of self - also referred to as apperception - is the representation of the ego. To hold such a perception, the human consciousness must have an internal perception of previously given representations, also referred to as sensibility. Self-consciousness then produces the intuition of the self.
This intuition is directly situated in the internal constitution of the mind and in the representation of time. In this way, when the subject intuits itself, it represents itself to itself in a manner that is affected by appearance rather than by what is. It is a subjective experience that is often dependent upon sensations that might be influenced by non-empirical elements such as the ego or the perceptions of others that are communicated to the self.

Appearances therefore directly affect the intuition of both external objects and internal subject. However, this is not to say that such perceptions are illusory. The sensuous intuition, which can be verified by communication with other researchers, provides a sense of empiricism to perceived data. Objective reality can then be ascribed at least to some degree to the forms of representation that are perceived. It is therefore impossible to ascribe a designation of mere appearance to all perceived phenomena. While intuition precedes perception and representation, it is also the basis of empirical experience and communication, and therefore verifiable as objective reality within time and space.

Cite this Document:

"Kant Our Knowledge Relates To" (2009, March 09) Retrieved April 28, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/kant-our-knowledge-relates-to-24144

"Kant Our Knowledge Relates To" 09 March 2009. Web.28 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/kant-our-knowledge-relates-to-24144>

"Kant Our Knowledge Relates To", 09 March 2009, Accessed.28 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/kant-our-knowledge-relates-to-24144

Related Documents

In this "slave morality," as Nietzsche states, the values of the master morality, which are proper, and turned around, which undermines the natural order. He believes the natural order was that the strong continue to succeed at the cost of the weaker members of society. In response to their lowered status in the order, the caste used their hatred, revenge, and resentment to create morals that would weaken the master

Kant and Happiness for the
PAGES 7 WORDS 2243

For example, many individuals value freedom and knowledge as things that can bring happiness. So, having their own value, these things are parts of happiness. Mill believed that everyone's happiness is important. He believed in what he called the 'greatest happiness principle.' According to the greatest happiness principle, a person is ethically required to try to bring about the consequences that would lead to the greatest amount of happiness for

Thus, as I encounter a rock on the ground, outside, among other rocks, I have a sense of its space and of the space in relation to all other objects in it. A rock found floating in the air, nowhere near other rocks, inside a jar gives a completely different sense of the space of a rock and how it relates to the world around it. We intuit our

To further support his theory, Kant puts forward the example of objects being positively valued and assessed using words and analogies which seem to have moral origins in the sense that they belong to the perimeter of morality, and not beauty. On the other hand, the empirical evaluation of things which is employed in the case of aesthetics is not employed in the case of judgment that is not

Seeking to strip his conception of knowledge to the bare minimum by removing all notions which can subject to reasonable doubt, Descartes differentiates between assumptions and true knowledge because, in his estimation, any perception based solely on sensory input is inevitably flawed, as the human sensory system is known to be fallible (Collingwood). By rejecting the role of assumptions in forming knowledge, Descartes devises perhaps the most well recognized

Guilt, it seems, is an emotion, and in an a priori, deontological account of morality, emotions do not factor into the judgment. This issue is less pronounced under Mill's view, but still, the issue of guilt seems to be missing from a strict utilitarian calculus (or, at the very least, it does not seem to be of great importance in the judgment). "Crimes and Misdemeanors," draws some inspiration from