LEADERSHIP, INTERPERSONAL SKILLS, DECISION-MAKING research paper prepared for the staff of New Jersey Publishing Corporation
Improving Leaders and Interpersonal Relationship
Communication Skills
Written, Oral, Listening, Perception)
Organization and Planning
This research paper analyzes the effect of leadership skills providing direction, interpersonal skills in interacting with others and decision making.
It includes oral communication skills, written business communication, and perception skills important in analyzing problems and proposing solutions.
Final component deals with organizational change and self-designing change management.
The research paper will be the basis of a proposal for a seminar workshop to enhance staff knowledge of such qualities as leadership and ability to interact with others for the enhancement of the capabilities of the staff.
Executive Summary
To counteract dire predictions in the globalized world, leadership, interpersonal relationship and decision-making in the corporate world should undergo enhancement, strengthening and change in design
The process takes careful analysis, outlining of problems and needs of all organizations undergoing change.
The research includes observations of what happens when leadership resides in only one person. It advocates leadership reposing in all other members of the organization.
Also included are oral communication, written business communication (business letters, memoranda).
The last component of the Research is organization planning and change. This outlines the complex process design management must go through so that effective change will be achieved in the organization.
Statement of the Problem
This study deals with the environment in which present day organizations exist. It aims to prove how organization through decisive leadership and self-designing schemes can improve the organizational set up.
Leadership, Interpersonal Skills, Decision-Making
Introduction
We are going through dramatic changes in corporate life, with knowledge and information explosion brought about by forced technology operations, the industrial wheel is turning faster than ever. It seems Zbigniew Brzezinski, writer and great thinker, has reason to predict a global climate that is going out of control. (Brzezinski, Zbigniew. Out of Control. N.Y, Simon and Schuster. 1993).
John Naisbitt (Naisbitt, John. Megatrends. Ten New Directories Transforming our Lives. N.Y, Warver Communications, 1982) talks of ten new directions changing our lives. There are economy-based, industrially powered.
We believe we can reverse all such dire predictions by successful leadership, successful interpersonal relationship in human resource management and successful communication.
These are all big words - narrowing them down to the basics will help.
Improving Leadership and Interpersonal Relationship
What do we aim for in improving leadership and interpersonal relationship? Organizational development. The objective is to improve human effectiveness in organized settings.
Effectiveness means that the objectives are being achieved in a cost-effective and humanly sound way; organized settings mean that the effort is to increase effectiveness when more than one individual is involved. (Blake, Robert R., Jane Srygley Mouton, & Ann Adams McCause. Change by Design. Mass.: Addison Wesley Publication, 1991).
Corporate executives with similar (corporate) background, in terms of corporate culture normally display strong leadership qualities, showing confidence in the strength of their convictions. As a result, participative management has been ushered in, with a focus on synergistic teamwork. Executives must learn to merge their own ideas with those of others in order to get the job done in a way that spells productivity for the corporation as a whole. Obviously this cannot be achieved in a situation where everybody says "yes" to the boss or all are doing their own thing. Consider the following points:
When three or more people of equal rank meet with crisis, there is widespread reluctance for any members to exercise initiative. Reluctance increases with the size of the group.
When one person is in charge, that person tends to assume full responsibility and to step forward and exercise full initiative.
When the person in change exercises such initiatives, others adopt a passive, follow-the-leader orientation.
When the person in charge seeks to solve the crisis, he or she does so directly by telling others what to do.
Centralizing authority in himself or herself, the person in charge effectively shuts out input from others.
Those not in change are reluctant to speak up even when they disagree with the high risk behavior of the person in charge, thereby shutting themselves out of the problem-solving loop.
Points 4, 5 & 6 become stronger when the competence of the person in charge has been demonstrated previously.
These findings lead to strong conclusion. The issue is not merely that of lodging authority in the single person who is in charge and therefore in control.
The conventional...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now