Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Minds and Brains: Do We Have Both?
Descartes' view, "I think, therefore I am," may not be entirely accurate when proposing that the essence of cognitive judgment, using the brain to "think," necessitates the use of consciousness to comprehend the state of "being." The neurodynamics of brain construct provides proficiency at completing thought processes. However, the dynamic system that creates meaning to logic involves the mind. Thus, the ideal that separates man from machine is the dual action of both mind and brain; a complex phenomenon that will prevent artificial intelligence from ever reaching human abilities.
According to Lawrence Shapiro, the multiple realizability thesis (MRT), which states that the mind can exist in a physical form, is likely unrealistic in that it is yet to demonstrate that the mind can be duplicated. Upon evaluating brain evolution and neuroscience data, he views the cognitive capacities of the brain as placing "strong constraints on the...physical organizations capable of realizing them." Both Professor Walter Freeman of U.C. Berkeley and Marvin Minsky of MIT see the mind as merely a tool used by the brain, not crediting it in the same manner as Shapiro. Minsky considers the mind and brain connection as having a psychological base rather than a physical one, where the brain not only thinks, but adapts to thinking, stimulated by memory and impacted by the concept of time. From this the mind is only a subset of processes issued by the brain. Freeman elaborates further on the presence of the mind, acknowledging that consciousness establishes the parameters by which the brain can act. Three different views on the state of mind in relation to brain function, giving evidence to the fact that the brain may induce logic, but the mind motivates the passion to convey it.
Bibliography
Freeman, Walter J. 1999. How Brains Make Up Their Minds. London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Minsky, Marvin. 2002. "Minds Are Simply What Brains Do." [Online]. Truth Journal. Available from Leadership U, http://www.leaderu.com/truth/2truth03.html. Accessed 16 Mar. 2004.
Shapiro, Lawrence A. 2004. The Mind Incarnate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lawrence Shapiro, The Mind Incarnate (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004).
Marvin Minsky, "Minds Are Simply What Brains Do." [Online]. (Truth Journal, 2002, available (from Leadership U, http://www.leaderu.com/truth/2truth03.html. Accessed 16 Mar. 2004).
Walter J. Freeman, How Brains Make Up Their Minds (London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson 1999).
Armstrong arguing mind . brain disticntion a distinction a difference (akin a distinction a kleenex a tissue)? Does adequately explain human conduct? Armstrong - mind theories There is much controversy regarding the difference between mind and brain, as while some support the belief that the mind has nothing to do with the brain because there is nothing physical about the former's functioning, others consider that the mind and the brain are
Mental Representations and the Mind-Brain Relationship MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS AND THE MIND-BRAIN The Dualism Argument Pure Materialist Viewpoint Theories Visual Stimuli vs. Speech stimuli Descartes Point-of-View Neurons and Synapses Mental Representations and the Mind-Brain Relationship In cognitive (neuro) science all through the last few decades, as in philosophy in the last 100 years, the issue of the mind-body (or mind-brain) occurrences is still open to discussion. Illogically, ever since Descartes nobody has suggested a workable alternate view of this problem.
Mind and Body A review of the required literature, Robert Thurman's "Wisdom" (Thurman), Karen Armstrong's "Homo Religiousus" (Armstrong), and Oliver Sacks' "The Mind's Eye: What the Blind See" (Sacks), gives significant insights into how the mind and body must work together to create our lived experience. Though the three authors may initially appear to discuss somewhat different topics, they have vital commonalities. The readings will lead the thoughtful reader to a
This showed not only the mapping of the brain that was possible -- that is, the association of certain specific areas of the brain with certain function and/or sensations from certain parts of the body -- but also that the adult brain was capable of changing in response to new stimulation. This finding was taken to new heights by Dr. Ramachandran, whose work with amputees and mirrors showed how profound
Mind: A theory of mind is basically described as the particular cognitive ability to understand other people as deliberate agents, which imply that it's the ability to interpret people's minds based on theoretical concepts of planned states like desires and beliefs. In philosophy, there is a common notion that the special cognitive ability in intrinsically dependent on individuals linguistic capabilities. The interpretation of the actions and intentions of other people
Dew (1996) regards left and right-brained thinking as being linked to the brain dominance theory. Left-brained thinkers emphasize rationality, data and analytics in their thinking. Right-brained people tend to solve problems through their understanding of relationships, embrace teamwork and look at things as a process. The two sides of the brain, therefore, can both play a role in problem-solving, but the approach to problem-solving can be substantially different. At times,