Monopoly And Imperfect Competition Form Essay

To this end the argument that monopolies are bad to consumers carries a lot of truth and fact with it and will only be fair to look at such an argument with due considerations. References

Baker, M.J. (1985). Marketing strategy and management. Macmillan: New York.

Belk, R.W. (1975). "Structural variables and consumer behavior." Journal of Consumer

Research 2: 157-164.

Besanko, D. et al. (1996). Economics of strategy. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

Day, G. et al. (1979). "Consumer-oriented approaches to identifying product-markets." Journal

of Marketing 43:8-19.

Dick, a.S. & Basu, K. (1994). "Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework."

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (2): 99-113.

Fraser, C. & Bradford, J. (1983). "Competitive market structure analysis: Principal partitioning of revealed substitutability." Journal of Consumer Research 10: 15-30.

Gabszewicz, J. et al. (2000). "Price competition with complementary goods." Economics Letters, forthcoming.

Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer demand, a new approach. Columbia University Press: New

York.

Lattin, J.M. & Leigh, M. (1985). "Using a variety-seeking model to identify substitute and complementary relationships among competing products." Journal...

...

(1968). "Economic theory and the meaning of competition." Quarterly Journal of Economics: 639-656.
Mussa, M. & S. Rosen (1978). "Monopoly and product quality." Journal of Economic Theory,

18: 301-317.

Pacheo, P.L. (1989). "Satisfaction guaranteed: a marketing service approach to measuring customer satisfaction and identify competitive opportunities." The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 4 (2): 45-52.

Painter, J. (2003). Monopolies in America. Retrieved March 16, 2011 from http://www.rationalamerican.com/economics/monopolies.html

Riley, G. (2006). Market structures. Retrieved March 16, 2011 from http://tutor2u.net/economics/revision-notes/a2-micro-market-structures-summary.html

Schwartzman, D. (1959). "The effect of monopoly on price" the Journal of Political Economy

67(4): 352-362

Slater, S.F. & John C.N. (1994). "Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship." Journal of Marketing 58(1): 46-55.

Srivastava, R. (1984). "A customer-oriented approach for determining market structures."

Journal of Marketing 48: 32-45.

Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. MIT Press, Cambridge: Massachusetts.

Triffin, R. (1940). Monopolistic competition and general equilibrium theory. Harvard University

Press: Boston, MA

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Baker, M.J. (1985). Marketing strategy and management. Macmillan: New York.

Belk, R.W. (1975). "Structural variables and consumer behavior." Journal of Consumer

Research 2: 157-164.

Besanko, D. et al. (1996). Economics of strategy. John Wiley and Sons: New York.
Painter, J. (2003). Monopolies in America. Retrieved March 16, 2011 from http://www.rationalamerican.com/economics/monopolies.html
Riley, G. (2006). Market structures. Retrieved March 16, 2011 from http://tutor2u.net/economics/revision-notes/a2-micro-market-structures-summary.html


Cite this Document:

"Monopoly And Imperfect Competition Form" (2011, March 17) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/monopoly-and-imperfect-competition-form-3643

"Monopoly And Imperfect Competition Form" 17 March 2011. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/monopoly-and-imperfect-competition-form-3643>

"Monopoly And Imperfect Competition Form", 17 March 2011, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/monopoly-and-imperfect-competition-form-3643

Related Documents

Perfect Competition, Monopoly, Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly The subject of competition is an interesting one. The general idea in economics seems to be, the more competition the better. "Good competition" results in a greater likelihood in overall efficiency and low prices. There are several main types of competition, these include, perfect competition, the most competitive market possible (and, presumably, the one of greatest value to the consumer), monopoly, the least competitive

Antitrust Practices and Market Power: Google Antitrust Behavior Economic theory expresses that competition contributes substantially to the efficient operations of markets, and hence to the improvement of a nation's wealth status. Antitrust laws seek to foster competition in the marketplace and to consequently ensure that the welfare of consumers is maximized through the provision of low-priced high-quality products. This the laws do by preventing the emergence of cartels and monopolies, which

However, because fast food is in part defined by its price point, the companies have only limited pricing power at the high end. Firms in the industry also tend to adopt either permanent or temporary cost leadership strategies (such as 99 cent menus) in order to attract business. The companies are unable to sustain low prices in this industry because the margins are inherently low and because most other

Microsoft Monopoly Why was Microsoft investigated for antitrust behavior? In the eyes of some legal analysts, Microsoft was investigated and taken to court over antitrust allegations because of the belief that it would not live up to its own word about what it intended (McKenzie and Shughart, 1998). There was little doubt about the fact that by the mid- to late-1990s Microsoft had virtual control over the operating system (Windows) that it

Microsoft Monopoly Since feudalism gave way to capitalism and the Industrial Revolution sparked a number of economic ideas, scholars have debated the idea of competition within the market. In most any economic system, competition forms the basis of the market economy. As well, within economic systems, there may be ethical and unethical practices and arrangements. Most of the unethical practices, after a time, become illegal and are discouraged, but others become

The deal was immediately criticized as anti-competitive by William Kennard, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and by the Communications Workers of America, which represents some workers at both of the merged companies. But neither government regulators nor union bureaucrats will have the slightest impact on the latest merger. They have neither the power nor the desire to oppose the plans of the giant telecommunications monopolies. More substantial opposition