Monopoly...Is A Great Enemy To Term Paper

PAGES
5
WORDS
1692
Cite

The Competition Commission also plays a major role to investigate the situations which are called 'Oligopoly Situations' which involve explicit or implicit collusion between firms. Then the Competition Commission decides if the monopoly is acting against the public interest or not. And if they find a firm with a monopoly situation they recommend measures such as:-

Price cuts

Price and profit controls removal of entry barriers breaking up of the firm which is rarely a recommendation

If a monopoly situation exists, the workers and managers would take a great advantage by using less technique, knowledge and expertise in producing a good and would enhance their means of profits. Thus the good would not be much to the standards, as it would be in the perfect competition. This is known as X-inefficiency (Brownless, C, 1989, P218), if compared to a perfectly competitive industry, considering the same cost and demand curve conditions; even then the monopolist will charge a higher price for less output.

Conclusion

Monopoly has both advantages and disadvantages in serving public or consumer interests. They have been examined by the equilibrium of monopoly and perfect competition. Through the analysis mentioned, many weak points of monopoly have been identified which include X-inefficiency,...

...

These factors often result for even bad consumer interests but on the other hand monopoly also has its potential strengths.
Bibliography

BPP Business Core Unit 4 Organization, Competition and Environment

Brownless, C, (1989) Economics Charles Letts & Co Ltd.

Brownless, C., Hurd, S., & Randall, K. (1985). BASIC economics. Butterworths BASIC series. London: Butterworths.

Sloman, J., & Sutcliffe, M. (2002). Economics. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall/Financial Times.

West, K, C, (1987) Economics GCSE (2nd) Charles Letts & Co Ltd.

Machovec, F.M. (1995). Perfect competition and the transformation of economics. London: Routledge.

Low, R.E. (1968). The economics of antitrust; competition and monopoly. Modern economic issues. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Scherer, F.M. (1993). Monopoly and competition policy. The International library of critical writings in economics, 30. Aldershot, Hants, England: E. Elgar.

Mueller, W.F. (1970). A primer on monopoly and competition. New York: Random House.

Colander, D.C. (1995). Economics. The Irwin series in economics. Chicago: Irwin.

Profit

MR

ATC

MC

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

BPP Business Core Unit 4 Organization, Competition and Environment

Brownless, C, (1989) Economics Charles Letts & Co Ltd.

Brownless, C., Hurd, S., & Randall, K. (1985). BASIC economics. Butterworths BASIC series. London: Butterworths.

Sloman, J., & Sutcliffe, M. (2002). Economics. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall/Financial Times.


Cite this Document:

"Monopoly Is A Great Enemy To" (2008, February 02) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/monopolyis-a-great-enemy-to-32493

"Monopoly Is A Great Enemy To" 02 February 2008. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/monopolyis-a-great-enemy-to-32493>

"Monopoly Is A Great Enemy To", 02 February 2008, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/monopolyis-a-great-enemy-to-32493

Related Documents

The lack of incentives or competitive pressures may lead monopolistic firms to neglect minimizing unit costs of production, i.e., to tolerate "X-inefficiency" (phrase coined by H. Leibenstein). Included in X- inefficiency are wasteful expenditures such as maintenance of excess capacity, luxurious executive benefits, political lobbying seeking protection and favourable regulations, and litigation" (Khemani and Shapiro, 1993). In all, monopoly is the economic state in which a single company produces a

Certainly, the most powerful demonstration of his approach to protection of his authority and the state against political dissent would come in the form of his uncompromising treatment of rebellion. The enormity and ethnic variations defining the Russian empire would subject it inherently to acts of rebellion, regional conflicts and various small but organized efforts at undermining the authority of the tsars. Peter took an extremely decisive approach to these

Smith believed this would lead to inefficiency. However, unlike Plato, Smith did not believe that the ideal republic should decide from birth what occupation an individual should follow, rather that the individual must freely choose by his or her own will, how to direct his or her energies and labor in the most efficient and self-interested fashion, which would ultimately result in the advancement of the nation as a whole.

Therefore, a country which is able to produce one good with a lower opportunity cost than another country, should specialize in producing that good which will turn into a competitive advantage. However, when assessing this theory at the level of international trade, it is harder to depict the competitive advantages. The model may seem to be unrealistic. The resources employed in real world are not restrained to labor and the

It offers a good theory as it emphasizes on the production and export of those items for which a country possesses a comparative advantage. Furthermore, through its focus on the reduction of taxes and tariffs in international trade and the adherent practices, the theory of comparative costs has set the basis for the contemporaneous processes of market liberalization and globalization. But the theory has not been spared from criticism. Oumar

History of Huey P. Long
PAGES 13 WORDS 4624

The session erupted in brawl, and in the end, the vote favored impeachment . This became known as "Bloody Monday." This time, Long's bullying tactics did not work. Long took his case to the people, claiming that his impeachment was a raucous attempt by Standard Oil to deprive the people of what they deserved. As the trial began, Long passed around "Round Robin" document that was signed by more than one