It falls on savers, not spenders;
3) Early and naive advocates of death taxes thought that such taxes would not distort behavior because they fell only on wealth that decedents left behind by accident. Now very strong evidence supports the common-sense idea that people are strongly motivated to leave wealth to their heirs. Death taxes distort the behavior and investment decisions of this important class of "intergenerational" savers;
Not only does the income tax not need a "backstop," the income tax is actually a bad tax precisely because it falls on savings, in effect double taxing saving as opposed to immediate consumption. Death taxes compound the error by adding a third tax on savings. A fair tax system should consistently tax spending, not work or savings, and should use progressive rates to meet whatever liberal or redistributive objectives it has;
Death taxes have not contributed to greater equality in America. In fact, the death tax has so many gaps, loopholes, and problems -- and the motivation to pass on wealth to heirs is so strong -- that the current death tax allows precisely the kind of wealth transmission it is designed to prevent or limit;
The tax is an extremely costly, cumbersome, and indirect way to assist charities. Charitable giving can be helped or subsidized within the constraints of any tax system, so the unfair and inefficient death tax is not needed for that end." (McCafferey, 1999)
SUMMARY and CONCLUSION
While the estate tax is in terms of economics inefficient in nature resulting in distortion to decisions in economics and while this tax results in depression of capital stock and results in less-long run growth this tax has driven charitable contributions noted by NBC Evening News on December 19, 2007 to be down by 50% for the 2007 Christmas season. While...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now