¶ … driving force behind the Self-Organizing Consciousness Model is awareness (SOC; Perruchet & Vinter, 2002). Perruchet and Vinter (2002) basically address the dilemma of the need for two independent forms of cognition, one conscious and one unconscious by simply arguing that the notion of unconscious representations are not demonstrated empirically or are inconsistent with the empirical literature and that one can only discuss conscious representations as being "cognitive" processes. Thus, the driving force in the SOC model is that on some level all processes defined as being cognitive involve some level of awareness. Of course the model would be invalidated if did not explain that there certainly are perceptions that do not reach awareness. In this model the stimuli that are perceived without direct awareness are processed in a bottom-up fashion and have a transient effect on the perceptual system (sensory processing), whereas self -- organizing requires conscious stimuli to be processed by top-down connections including working memory and long-term memory storage. Thus, consciousness is a self organizing top-down process that incorporates sensory stimulation in order to generate awareness and meaning. Perruchet and Vinter's (2002) model attempts to solve the dilemma of conscious awareness and behavior by maintaining that the phenomena...
Unfortunately for Perruchet and Vinter recent understandings of the brain and consciousness indicate that there are implicit forms of mental processes that do qualify as cognition (Evans & Stanovich, 2013). Consciousness can exist on two levels such that there is a fast intuitive cognitive process that is used in learning and decision-making and a slow and reflective process that allows for more deliberate decision-making, responses, consideration, etc.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now