¶ … Philonus and Hylas discuss the issue of skepticism and its meaning. Philonus is presented as the Skeptic from the first, while Hylas sees himself as a realist. However, Philonus suggests that Hylas is wrong and that he (Philonus) can demonstrate that Hylas is actually a skeptic. Hylas does not believe this is possible, yet Philonus proceeds to guide the argument so that he does prove just what he says he can prove.
The discussion beings when Hylas asks if it is not true that Philonus has expressed the view that there is no such thing in the world as material substance. Philonus says he did not say that, and that what he did say is that there is no such thing as what philosophers call material substance in this world. This is the skeptical position Hylas sees him as taking, and Hylas states that he can think of nothing that would be more against common sense than to state that there is no such thing as matter. It is this statement which Philonus says he will use to show that Hylas is the true skeptic.
Philonus wants to establish what Hylas means by a skeptic, and Hylas answers that a skeptic is someone who doubts of everything. The individual is not a skeptic, then, if he has no doubts. Doubting is also described as standing between the positive and the negative, meaning not being sure which is correct. Philonus seizes on this to suggest that Hylas ha made an error in challenging Philonus's view that there is no matter and claiming it is skepticism. If Philonus asserts that there is no matter, he is taking a clear stand on the issue and so cannot be said to be skeptical, for if he...
What Hylas means is that a skeptic is one who denies the evidence of his senses, and since the senses say that matter is a real thing, then the skeptic is denying reality. When Hylas refers to sensible things, he apparently means only those things which can be perceived immediately by the senses. Philonus challenges such a simple definition, and Hylas again backtracks and restates his definition.
Philonus guides the conversation to show that what we perceive, the states we perceive, may or may not be in the objects we perceive, but in any case they cannot be perceived without the presence and participation of the mind. Philonus suggests that any opinion which leads to an absurdity cannot be true and yet he shows that based on what Hylas has said, an object may be hot and cold at the same time, which is absurd.
What Philonus shows in his analysis is that sensory perceptions involve imprecise definitions and cannot be trusted to provide clear proof of the existence or nature of anything. Instead, all that the individual can know is that in some way the external world causes the mind to react to stimuli and to determine various states on that basis. The skeptical position is that our senses mislead us, perhaps in every way possible so that we can never know what is real in the world and what is not. Philonus leads Hylas to the position that nothing then can be…
Sensory Perceptions Three Reasons for Believing in the Accuracy or Inaccuracy of Sensory Information Sensory perception can be defined as the process of receipt of stimuli and then their organization and interpretation by using the five senses for making the meaning of one's surrounding environment. In other words, it is the process by which a person acquires an understanding of his/her environment (Kemp, Hollywood & Hort 2009). Thus, by employing sensory perceptions,
Sensory Perceptions" Can trust senses interpretation sensory data give accurate view Sensory data is a valuable means of obtaining knowledge and information about one's surroundings. However, sensory data is extremely prone to bias due to an assortment of different factors. These factors include the unreliability of memory, the degree to which senses can be influenced by other cognitive and emotional responses, and the fact that sense are essentially subjective, and
Sensation and Perception The issue of being able to trust one's senses has been the topic of many philosophical debates and whole books have been written on this debate. There are convincing arguments made for both sides of the issue. Nonetheless, anyone who ambulates, operates a motor vehicle, eats, interacts with others, etc. trusts the information that their senses give them (Christian, 2011). Sensory information is the result of physical stimuli
Fallibility of Reliance Upon Sensory Data Accounting Author's institution affiliation The Necessity & Fallibility of Reliance upon Sensory Data Without sensory data, most humans would likely die after very short lives. Sensory data on a very basic level allows beings to navigate and interact with their environments and world. Without sensory information, the simplest tasks could not be accomplished and it would be exceptionally difficult to maintain general safety. Without sensory data, society
Properties of Sensory Perception Within the realm of Gestalt theory, the concept of attention is differentiated from that of perception. Attention is the cognitive ability of the human brain to simultaneously focus on a variety of subjects, while continually adjusting the intensity of that focus in response to external factors. A total of four techniques have been identified by Gestalt theory to exert an impact on one's attention: intensity, novelty, incongruity,
ESP The term ESP (Extra Sensory Perception) was coined by J.B. Rhine in the 1920s (Blackmore, 2001). Rhine investigated paranormal phenomena while at Duke University. ESP refers to a number of psychic abilities such as telepathy, precognition, clairvoyance (remote viewing), or clairaudience (hearing voices or thoughts psychically). One of the more popular methods to demonstrate that someone has ESP called the Ganzfeld procedure (Bem & Honorton, 1994; Blackmore, 2001). In the Ganzfeld