Philosophy Dialogue Essay

Length: 3 pages Sources: 3 Subject: Black Studies - Philosophy Type: Essay Paper: #70249803 Related Topics: Mills Theory, Place, Philosophers, Philosophy Of Education
Excerpt from Essay :

Dialogue Between Aeschylus and Plato

Plato: Cities and their functioning are just like individuals and their functioning system, wouldn't you agree?

Aeschylus: I can agree with you up to a certain point. Individuals' functioning system can be assimilated to that of human groups before they organized in tribes.

P: If I understand correctly what you are saying, tribes did not function under the same laws as individuals?

Your understanding is correct, my opinion is that tribes were not governed at all, and that they functioned based on the characteristics of his leader, the most powerful of individuals. Most often, these characteristics are based on heroism.

P: You cannot believe that groups of people were simply governed by heroism! I can agree with you that heroism is one of the characteristics of great leaders, but it is far from being sufficient for governing a tribe or a city!

A: So, in your opinion what are the parts that ensure government?

P: I have divided the functioning of cities into three parts: philosophers, guardians, and craftsmen.

A: How did you establish these as ensuring cities' government?

P: I connected them with the most important three parts within the individual (Plato -- The Republic). These parts are represented by spirit, appetite, and intellect. He intellect can be compared with philosopher-kings, spirit can be compared to the guardians, and appetite can be compared to the craftsmen.

A: And what is...

...

The guardians ensure that these laws are enforced and protect the city if the situation requires it. The craftsmen obey rules and provide the necessary products to the city.

A: Can a member of a category move to another?

P: There is no movement between the categories. In order to function properly, each individual must accept his place in society. This is my idea of justice.

A: I find you idea on justice intriguing, as I consider justice having another nature in comparison with what you have described. I think justice is a process that has evolved from tribal rules based on the power of the strongest individual to city-states that build legislation and ensure rules are applied.

P: Surely you must think that a hierarchy is required in establishing and applying rules! In my opinion on justice, it can only be reached by a hierarchy of philosophers, guardians and craftsmen.

A: I think that justice…

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference list:

1. Plato (1993). The Republic. Oxford University Press.

2. Aeschylus (1953). The Oresteia. University of Chicago Press.


Cite this Document:

"Philosophy Dialogue" (2014, June 08) Retrieved May 13, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-dialogue-189757

"Philosophy Dialogue" 08 June 2014. Web.13 May. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-dialogue-189757>

"Philosophy Dialogue", 08 June 2014, Accessed.13 May. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-dialogue-189757

Related Documents
Philosophy Plato's Works on Euthyphro,
Words: 1521 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 710226

The question arising from this claim is whether evidence exists to prove that there exists an infinitely good, powerful, and wise God where morality naturally emerges. Humes argues that is hard to imagine that an all-good, powerful God exists in this world full of pain and misery. From these claims, one can argue that this insight, or God, has both evil and good, as is present in man if

Dialogue Exercises the Restaurant Was
Words: 517 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 10009712

" "Stop trying to make me feel better. I want to feel bad now and I want to embrace my entire sad human dimension" "As long as you also accept it, we might actually get somewhere. Think of some of the nice things you have done together." "No, that will make me sadder." "Didn't you say you wanted to embrace your sad human dimension?" "Yes, but not like that. I want to be philosophical and

Philosophy Socrates to Sartre and
Words: 2412 Length: 7 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 58399067

Berkley stated that because the senses were potentially faulty, everyone's sense perceptions and thus everyone's 'truth' was unique and variable. However, most empiricists like Locke believed that some (few) things could be known with certainty, like shape and color, even if other properties of things could not be known. The empiricists come from the Aristotelian rather than the Platonic tradition of philosophy, and had rigorous standards of truth based upon

Philosophy It Has Been Know That Coalitions,
Words: 630 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 81791557

Philosophy It has been know that coalitions, task force or work groups are a part of public health practice in order to help stop violence and drug abuse. I feel they are an important part of the community because they can help to change the environment to better by fighting for our rights to be safe. "Consistency can be particularly important in addressing a community issue, especially if there are already

Philosophy Plato Lived a Century
Words: 1010 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 90251846

This idea was accepted by most of the philosophical schools of the time, including the Atomists. Plato took quite a different approach and found that ideas, as noted, and saw idas as existing outside of human consciousness. Plato's doctrine of recollection holds that learning is the remembering of a wisdom that the soul enjoyed prior to its incarnation, another aspect of the idea that there are ideal forms "remembered" by

Philosophy -- Plato's "The Apology" "The Apology"
Words: 1808 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 54958543

Philosophy -- Plato's "The Apology" "The Apology" is Plato's recollection of Socrates' trial, conviction, sentencing and last words to the jury. The Apology is divided into three parts. The first part, Socrates' principal speech to the jury, is his argument against old and new accusations. The second part, Socrates' "counter-assessment," is Socrates' rebuttal of the prosecutor's recommendation of the death penalty. The third part, Socrates' final words to the jury, consists